Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: I vomitted today...


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Billy NY on August 05, 2012 at 07:29:22 from (67.248.100.3):

In Reply to: I vomitted today... posted by John_PA on August 05, 2012 at 00:12:35:

One thing is I don't understand the opposing opinion posted in response to this thread. It makes no logical sense regardless of the landowner, purpose of the land, to haphazardly allow an industrial entity to run rampant, to not plan better, to not design better and to not survey for the most logical solution.

The installers of that pipe are absolutely going to do everything in their power to take the easiest route, its more productive, (feet per day is the high priority for them) clean land is less costly to install pipe in and takes less time.... Ok, anyone would agree that that makes sense, but...... given what is shown in the photo, any intelligent land owner, I don't care who you are, what your background is, and what you do with your land, would have to recognize an alternate route, away from good agricultural ground.

Once an industrial entity has taken over a site and has rights to it, you are hard pressed to have any mobility to react to any rough shod actions by them, say by virtue of their business on the site that transverses through your land.

I know with the power company locally, it could go either way, but, I commend them on how they do their work. NYS DEC is a stickler for environmental issues and concerns. They recently did a sizeable project through this placer and are currently doing an extensive project through our other place. Both projects mind you, have been executed carefully, with strict adherence to NYS DEC and other considerations, landowners contacted and everything was done with a cooperative effort by all parties, from power company officials, representatives down right to the guys in the field and I can name one from Asplundh, Ben who was absolutely a pleasure to work with on all aspects. The line crew was a little rough, they need feet per day and don't stop to smell the roses, but knowing that the forestry outfit follows them and makes sure things are right in the end. NYS DEC compliance here was excellent, I told the DEC rep that myself, having dealt with contractors most of my life, I told them they are doing a good job on this land next to a 20 acre wetland and it kept a watchful eye from further in depth scrutiny. Industry can work, but it has to start at the beginning.

Or, if that alternate route is in fact not possible, well people..... what options do we have to get the job done, we can put a man on the moon, but we can not find a solution for this dilemma ?


Well first off there needs to be a scope of work written for the installer to adhere too, at the behest of a diligent landowner, sad to think people still see money and absolutely nothing else and would not do this. Some of things contained in that scope of work would be compensation for existing crops. Another aspect would be future crops, losses associated with the lower yields and lesser quality. During the installation, they are obviously going to excavate. Ok, so why is it not possible to strip and properly stockpile top soils, securing it for the restoration work later. Bring in some additional topsoil to supplement. You strip where the pipe excavation is, and along it for the pipelayers, trucks and what have you. Pipe is set, its backfilled, if excavation spoil is not suitable for back fill, what options are there, export from site, screen it, use what is suitable, import additional or supplementary fill etc. Pipe is eventually back filled. I would be concerned about compaction next so why could not the limited ag areas be subsoiled, pipe is located, and just done in the ag fields. Next you place the topsoil, grade and plant a cover crop to hold it. Not necessarily in the above order, or exactly as stated, but I absolutely do not understand why this could not be done, I don't want to hear about hardship or additional cost by a gas producer, because these additional work items will not harm their profitability in any way, they would not be in there if it was marginal, they are going to make good money and the upfront costs to install the infrastructure will be defrayed by same and hardly noticed when done, its the same in construction.

I have worked on 36" pipe, set in the ground through some of the worst conditions, I know what it takes and what goes on. In '91 a 70 mile 36" line was set east west through NY and crosses the NY state thruway, I worked on several sections of it, on log matts hauling suitable backfill. I have done countless miles of water main through similar conditions and have done the restoration work, foreman always selected me because of the work I did.

We need to be smart about this, it does not mean you need to oppose it, it does mean you need to get off your @ss and use the intelligence given to you, even if its been collecting dust for a long time and keep industry in check about land use.

Look at Europe, and how residential areas are segregated from ag land, and that ag land is expansive, now most of us are used to a farmstead layout and it would be difficult to even consider living off site, but it works for them, and the point is that ag land to them is recognized as extremely important, or it would not be so and that is my point excactly, does not mean people need to follow that model, but they should show the same concern for the land that does produce agricultural crops.

The problem is people don't see far enough ahead, and they should based on numbers alone, population increases should drive that, but at the moment, there is no problem and its human nature to just muddle along until the last minute, and by then it will be too late or be of grave consequence, you either pay now or pay dearly later on !


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Women and Tractors - More Views From the Farmer's Wife - by Teri Burkholder. The top ten reasons why the judges wouldn't let you participate in the stock antique tractor pull: Hey, this is stock! It came with that V8 in it! That "R" on my tires stands for "really old" not radial! Blue gas? We thought it was a pretty color! What wire hooked to my throttle? ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy