Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Is it true


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by RodInNS on December 19, 2008 at 19:03:02 from (216.118.158.123):

In Reply to: Is it true posted by tork rench on December 18, 2008 at 18:39:43:

I would say that there's good and bad among all of them... but on balance I don't know too many Deere owners around here that rave about how little fuel they use. I know of some that don't do the volume of work we're doing on this farm that use a lot more fuel than we do with a fleet of Fords.
Wether you can blame that on the Deere tractors, their work habits or the fact that they're using 3 80 Hp Saran engines to do all their work.... I don't know, but they use more fuel for the farm as a whole.

One thing that bears mentioning about UNLC tests is this: The official test is conducted for maximum power at rated speed.

Some engines are very efficient at that speed and power level. Some are more efficient at lower speeds and power levels. Holding a fuel efficiency record for a tractor that runs at full power at 2500 rpm is all well and good, but if the tractor does all it's work at 1400 when it's well below it's torque curve and performs as a gutless wonder... it's not getting it's best efficiency. I think that's a factor that hits a lot of later Deere engines very hard. They put up some fine numbers on a dyno at maximum power, but get them out in the field doing actual work at varying speeds and loads and their real efficiency drops off somewhat. That's a factor that's not readily shown in the official UNLC tests.

Again, fro what I see of deere's, and those are mostly 30 series and 40 series manheim's, they are not efficient. Not nearly as efficient as comparable size Ford's, IH's, Brown's, Zetor's and Belarus's that are around here.
The ruski's were efficient because they were simple tractors with a deep stroke slow revving engines. The browns because of a decent length stroke and smalish displacement/power ratio. The Ford's were decent probably because of their flatish torque curve. They drink it pretty good on the top end.
The deere's that I've worked with had pretty narrow, quick torque bands in the higher speed range... so they were destined to run fast and not do much unless they ran fast, and that's probably what kills their efficiency on lighter loads.
If you pummeled the crap out of it and ran it hard all day at maximum power it would probably do a lot of work for it's fuel. A perfect example being a dozer...


Rod


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Restoration Story: 1951 Farmall H - by The Red (John Fritz). I have been a collector of Farmall tractors since 1990 when I first obtained part of the family farm in Eastern Indiana. My current collection includes a 1938 F20, 1945 H, 1946 H, and the recently purchased 1951 H. This article will focus on what I encountered and what I did to bring the 1951 NEAR DEATH Farmall H back to life. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy