Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: IH 274 opinion


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Hugh MacKay on January 31, 2007 at 02:59:26 from (216.208.58.148):

In Reply to: Re: IH 274 opinion posted by E.B. Haymakin' on January 30, 2007 at 22:58:37:

Ed: Very common practice in the past 25 years, companies use the same engine in 3 different hp tractors. I always tried to buy so I was getting the engine with the lowest hp aplication. One of the older example of this was the IH C-113 and C-123 used in small Farmalls. The engine was far more sucessful in the Super A, 100, 130 and 140, than in the Super C, 200, 230 and 240. The bit of extra weight coupled with the 36 inch tires, was just too much for that little engine.

Getting back to the diesels, it's been well known for years the efficiency in diesel lie in the fact they developed maximum torque at much lower rpm than gas tractors. Most of them hitting it at 1,500 rpm or lower. It cut down on engine wear, and it also created fuel efficiency. The guys in this thread are calling the 274 fuel efficient with 99 cubic inches turning 2,600 rpm. Had IH developed a 135 cubic inch 4 cylinder turning 1,800 rpm it would have burnt 1/2 as much fuel and we would never have heard tell of premature engine rebuilds.

In my opinion the whole farm equipment industry has gone the wrong direction in the past 35 years. They are all going for high rpm and lower cubic inches, to come up with a lighter engine. Unprecedented the number of pre 10,000 hour rebuilds. From a manufacturers point of view this is great, we wear the tractor out in 10 years and are back for another, and only getting 4,000 to 6,000 hours of service from them.

The trucking industry has gone the other direction, with most highway tractors turning 1,650 rpm at 65 mph and using big cubic inch. those guys are getting 20,000 to 30,000 hours on engines. We only get what we're willing to buy. If you think about the work being by those big diesels stacked aginst fuel consumption, compared to the smaller farm tractors, the tractors are a disaster. Heck our envoirnment depts shouldn't even allow these small modern engines to use oxygen. But then, the same can be said for the truck when comparing it against the locomotive.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
: :

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Tractor Traction - by Chris Pratt. Our first bout with traction problems came when cultivatin with our Massey-Harris Pony. Up till then, this tractor had been running a corn grinder and pulling a trailer. It had new unfilled rear tires and no wheel weights. The garden was already sprouting when we hooked up the mid-mount shovel cultivators to the Pony. The seed bed was soft enough that the rear end would spin and slowly work its way to the downhill side of the gardens slight incline. From this, we learned our lesson sinc ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Oliver 550 Diesel runs like a watch three point hitch pto engine gone threw about two hundred hours ago nice clean tractor [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy