Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: O/T cement question. Made for the old timers


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Billy NY on July 23, 2006 at 04:45:59 from (152.163.100.74):

In Reply to: O/T cement question. Made for the old timers posted by old on July 22, 2006 at 21:27:15:

That is an interesting question. I remember the floors in our old barns, one them is still in-tact, and there were larger round stone in the mix it seems. It defintitely appears that in old buildings, things were done different, I wonder what the mix looked in in the Hoover Dam, in regards to aggregate size.

I just dug up around the base of my foundation here, and it the footings were not trowelled, so you can see the round stone in the mix, it was poured in 1977.

When in college, we studied strenghts and statistics of materials and we did a lot with concrete, creating our own mix design, testing same in cylinders and beams. Most of what we did in the design was out of ASTM C 104 - 106 or somewhere around there, from analyzing sieve sizes and specific gravity of the aggregates to acutally making mixes.

I used to think it was fun, because most of these materials I 've hauled in a dump truck, but I never thought I'd be analyzing them.

From what I can understand and based on all the things that comprised formulating a mix design to meet a certain compressive strength, it seems ASTM ( American Society of Testing Materials ) that one thing was important, the uniformity of the aggregate, of all the composite sizes from a source. It's all combined like a recipe, so much of each sieve size aggregate, in measured by weight increments, besides the cementitious material ( portland ) and water as well as admixtures used today. I believe this is what gives it it's compressive strength, uniformly, whereas if you were to place large aggregate into the mix, it could concentrate in an area, or a variety of things, including voids, hard to really say, but could jeopardize the strength in areas of the pour, creating weak spots. That is just a theory though, on a large pour like a bridge pier or column, or maybe not so, but if your using 6" aggregate on an 8" foundation wall, maybe it's an issue.

Another thing that comes to mind, I see pea gravel and round aggregate still used in bag mixes, I don't see it in mixes made by the suppliers and delivered in trucks. I think that the majority of suppliers use a crushed stone aggregate, it has a rougher surface and I would think makes a better bond, vs. round aggregate. I'm sure when the footings were poured here, that the top had a layer of fines on it, and was gray, no stone showing, now after disturbing it, seems like that layer spalls a little easier, exposing the round aggregate inside. This would appear to also be even more prevalent if exposed or in areas where the concrete was around harsh elements, freezing, thawing, chemicals, salt like on roads. Concrete has capillaries and things can be absorbed into it, I would think the round stone may lose it's bond easier, but who is to day if that is correct, just an opinion here.

ACI , is another reference standard for concrete, ( American Concrete Institute ) I recall using some of those journals for research papers I did as part of my class work, did one on the abrasiveness of concrete as used in highway applications, got an A on it, was always imaginative, no one in the class had any far fetched topics like this one I did, went out on a limb I recall, but those journals were more suited to engineers, not written so much in laymans terms if I recall. It seems that they test sections of slabs and also insert or put test sections on highways and analyze same for wear. In the lab there is a giant arm with a tire and all the pieces are a trapezoid shape, creating a circle, the wheel goes around in circles to simulate years of wear. From what I recall about that, is the harder the aggregate, and the stronger the mix design, the higher the abrasion resistance.

It's a vast subject no doubt.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
: :

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Women and Tractors - More Views From the Farmer's Wife - by Teri Burkholder. The top ten reasons why the judges wouldn't let you participate in the stock antique tractor pull: Hey, this is stock! It came with that V8 in it! That "R" on my tires stands for "really old" not radial! Blue gas? We thought it was a pretty color! What wire hooked to my throttle? ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy