Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: OT-Vortec 4.3 improvements over regular4.3


[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by jdemaris on February 22, 2005 at 20:13:17 from (209.23.30.42):

In Reply to: OT-Vortec 4.3 improvements over regular4.3 posted by DCM on February 22, 2005 at 19:39:40:

Vortec is supposed to have better low-end torque and better mileage, partly due to the more direct injection of fuel. I don't believe the better mileage claim. Early 94 engines and older 4.3s have throttle body injection, then for around two years -starting in 94 CPI was used, then CSFI. CPI still uses one central injector like TBI does, but uses separate hoses that run to each port. It also uses a high-pressure 60 PSI fuel system unlike TBI. It is expensive to fix and is replaced as a unit. The later CSFI has a separate injector for each port and has some replaceble parts and is less trouble prone than the CPI.
I had a 92 TBI 4.3 Blazer, I have a 94 AWD Astrovan AWD 4.3 with CPI, and two of my sons have 2000 Blazers with 4.3s with CSFI. My older 92 non-Vortec 4.3 Blazer with TBI averaged 14 MPG in the winter in all around driving and got around 19 on the highway under the best conditions. My 94 Astrovan with the 4.3 CPI system gets 14 MPG average and 18 highway, and both of my sons' 2000 Blazers with the CSFI 4.3s are averaging 12 MPG and 18 highway in winter driving.
So, I haven't seen any whopping differences in mileage, and I haven't noticed a power increase either. If anything, the mileage has been a little worse with the newer Vortecs. I live in a hilly area, maybe the gains would be different in highway/flatland driving. I will say that all the 4.3s have been more powerful and slightly better in fuel than my 86 Blazer with the 2.8 TBI was.
My 6.2 diesel Blazers both will get around 21 MPG on the highway and 16-17 around town, so that beats all the Vortec Blazers.


Follow Ups:




Post a Followup

:
:

: :

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Women and Tractors - More Views From the Farmer's Wife - by Teri Burkholder. The top ten reasons why the judges wouldn't let you participate in the stock antique tractor pull: Hey, this is stock! It came with that V8 in it! That "R" on my tires stands for "really old" not radial! Blue gas? We thought it was a pretty color! What wire hooked to my throttle? ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy