Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Why a tricycle front end?


[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by paul on June 11, 2003 at 09:21:58 from (66.60.197.104):

In Reply to: Why a tricycle front end? posted by Steve W on June 11, 2003 at 06:14:47:

Narrow front end was cheaper (We are talking wars & depression, price _was_ an issue in going from horses to tractors. It's amazing they had the innovation they did, for the times & hardships of the era of these tractors.)

Corn pickers. You can't mount a cornpicker on a wide front tractor.

Front (mid-mount, really) cultivators. Some newer designs worked with wide-front, but early models only worked with narrow front. Also you could cultivate 2 rows, turn on the end & come back in the next 2 rows. A wide front could not turn short enough, often couldn't make it in 4 rows. Ran down more end rows trying to turn around.

Manuverablity. Can turn _much_ shorter with most narrow fronts compared to wide fronts. Try backing a 4-wheel wagon with a wide front - it's easy with a good narrow front.

Loaders. Those early hydraulic systems were poor. Used very small buckets for dirt & manure, all they could lift. So the narrow front could follow along behind the narrow bucket & get something hauled out. Wide front would be wider than the bucket, the wheels rode up on the sides & you couldn't get anything done.

Dependable. Early wide fronts were all thin & spidery & had all those tie-rod contraptions. Got a bad rep for falling apart, needing more attention. Added weight to the tractor.

Row crop is all about adjustable wheel widths to match the row widths & being tall enough to clear a growing crop. You obviously were not in row-crop country of the midwest. :) There really weren't many of those N tractors around here - they didn't turn short, they didn't have clearence for the crop to go under the frame, they couldn't fit a row crop cultivator..... I see a lot of support & fond memories of the N's in the south & east on these forums. Really much different out here in the midwest. In my region the H & M IHC tractors are the ones that hold fond memories for many. Ford was that little thing a few folks had that did some utility jobs, but not real work.

I'm not trying to start a color war, just trying to give you history on how it was. :)

--->Paul


Follow Ups:




Post A Followup

:
:

: Re: Re: Why a tricycle front end?

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Third Brush Generators - by Chris Pratt. While I love straightening sheet metal, cleaning, and painting old tractors, I use every excuse to avoid working on the on the electrics. I find the whole process sheer mystery. I have picked up and attempted to read every auto and farm electrics book with no improvement in the situation. They all seem to start with a chapter entitled "Theory of Electricity". After a few paragraphs I usually close the book and go back to banging out dents. A good friend and I were recently discussing our tractor electrical systems when he stated "I figure it all comes back to applying Ohms Law". At this point ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Oliver 550 Diesel runs like a watch three point hitch pto engine gone threw about two hundred hours ago nice clean tractor [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy