Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Farmall 856 vs JD 4020D


[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by JD70Jim on August 14, 2001 at 07:37:30 from (64.197.39.213):

In Reply to: Farmall 856 vs JD 4020D posted by IH1 on August 11, 2001 at 22:51:05:

It is my OBSERVATION that for this pair of tractors, pure horsepower comparissons are unrealistic. To begin with, these are tractors built 1964-1972 for the John Deere and 1967-1971 for the Farmall. If you really NEED horsepower, you can certainly indulge. There is always the 4520,4320, 4620 vs the 1256, &1066.

I do not expect that ANYONE would use either of these tractors as a primary, heavy use tractor in a farming operation. If you are needing the tractor to make a living from it, you would have a much newer tractor.

An older tractor of this size is now most likely to be a third string backup on a larger farm, most likelly to be found pulling wagons and running an auger, baling hay, or other lower horsepower requirements. If this is what you are needing, Fuel efficiency ratings, max horsepower, and whatnot are unlikely to be a major factor, unlike what you would be worrying about were you spending $100,000 on a new, high horsepower tractor and were planning 500 hours a year for it!

A hobbyfarmer, on a small acreage (100 acres or so) would be able to use the horsepower as it was originally intended. However, either of these tractors will deliver MORE power than is needed. I know this, being on a 116 acre hobby farm myself and using a 1968 4020D. I could certainly get along fine with less hp---a 2510 would actually have sufficient---but I LIKE the 4020! I also LIKE the other 4 tractors I have (but don't always need).

The biggest consideration, in my opinion, between the Farmall 856 and the John Deere 4020 is this: which tractor is more comfortable, is easiest to operate, has the most convenient controls, starts easiest, and will have the best track record for repairs. The "track record" for repairs should be judged on an individual evaluation of each tractor---not a group judgement of each type as a whole. I suggest that you evaluate each choice mechanically, operate each tractor for an hour (or more if possible) and buy the one which will make you the most happy.

Save the maximum performance debate for evaluating late model tractors, because you will need to know how much work you can extract from a high hours per year tractor, and also you could debate the horsepower producing merits of a pulling tractor, because that is what you need to know in order to win!


Follow Ups:




Post A Followup

:
:

: Re: Re: Farmall 856 vs JD 4020D

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Women and Tractors - More Views From the Farmer's Wife - by Teri Burkholder. The top ten reasons why the judges wouldn't let you participate in the stock antique tractor pull: Hey, this is stock! It came with that V8 in it! That "R" on my tires stands for "really old" not radial! Blue gas? We thought it was a pretty color! What wire hooked to my throttle? ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy