Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Gearing Question relating to a math problem????


[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Nolan on August 08, 2001 at 09:57:50 from (209.48.190.220):

In Reply to: Gearing Question relating to a math problem???? posted by Alberta Mike on August 07, 2001 at 14:13:01:

The smaller gear unit is always less efficient then the larger unit. Has to do with the efficiencies of power transfer. Bear with me, and I'll explain and give you an example.

Whenever you put power across a gear (or a sprocket) the power is tangental to the axis of rotation. The gear can rotate, so the force across it causes rotation. The force is always a side force, the reaction (rotation) is the torque.

Take a look at your bicycle example. Lets start the bicycle from a standstill. The pedals are at the 3 and 6 o'clock positions. You stand on the pedal, providing the force. The shaft rotates (torque), transmitting a force to the chain, and away you go.

Now when you first put your weight on the pedal, all the force was straight down. If the bicycle couldn't move, there would be no rotational action. If things were weak, the pedal assembly would break off straight down under the force of your weight.

That's the key point.

Take a normal bicycle crank, and because of the leverage arm, it's going to rotate. Lots of the force from your weight goes into rotating the crankshaft.

Now lets put a tiny crankshaft on there. One with say 1/4" throw. You won't be able to make that bicycle move, even if you had legs like Charles Atlas. The reason is because percentage wise most of the force is now going into the bearing, not into creating rotational force.

So with that little tiny bicycle crankshaft, we lose all our power into side forces (pushing down in the case of a bicycle), and don't get it into the rotation. Push hard enough, and you'll push the crankshaft right off the bottom of the bicycle frame.

There is a ratio of how much power gets transferred into rotational torque vs side thrust against the bearings, and it has to do with the length of the arm.

Aha! So little gear sets lose more power in side loads then large gear sets do, *of the same ratio*!

Put too much load against a little set of gears, and they'll rip right out of their bearing races. Sound like what happens to a lot of car transmissions when the owner hops up the engine? Yep, that's the problem. The gears are physically too small a diameter for the now increased power being applied across them.

This is why heavy machinery uses much larger diameter gears then light weight equipment does. Even when they have the same ratio.

This exact subject is covered in engineering courses btw.



Follow Ups:




Post A Followup

:
:

: Re: Re: Gearing Question relating to a math problem????

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Women and Tractors - More Views From the Farmer's Wife - by Teri Burkholder. The top ten reasons why the judges wouldn't let you participate in the stock antique tractor pull: Hey, this is stock! It came with that V8 in it! That "R" on my tires stands for "really old" not radial! Blue gas? We thought it was a pretty color! What wire hooked to my throttle? ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy