Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Did you know there back at it again?


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by oldtanker on January 19, 2018 at 18:21:14 from (66.228.255.59):

In Reply to: Did you know there back at it again? posted by Brent Zappe on January 19, 2018 at 10:43:25:

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

Really? Where did you find that info? When I did so looking just day before yesterday I found that CA is running about a 1.6 BILLION dollar deficit.

They have 12% of the US population and absorbs the single biggest chunk of the nations welfare. They have a total number of people on assistance that exceeds the TOTAL of 44 other states.

You have to look at numbers. Yes other states have a higher percentage of that states population on assistance (high side is a tad over 40% but only about 850,000 people) while CA has millions on welfare. Spending by state can be found here: https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/compare_state_spending_2017b40a. CA gets the single biggest chunk of welfare. Remember, 50% of 2 is 1 while 5% of 100 is 5. So me saying that state X has 40 of it's population on assistance doesn't mean that those numbers are really high. You can state numbers/percentages to make something look better or worse to suit the agenda you are pushing. For example, highway deaths. They are somewhere north of 35,000 a year in the US but amount to less than 1% of the population. Something like .001%. Now if you tried pushing for safer roads/laws ECT saying that .001% died last year you wouldn't get far. So you use the numbers. SO you don't even say "over 35,000" you say "almost 40,000".

Another thing to look at in CA is movement. CA is losing about 500,000 people a year more than they are gaining. Most leaving are educated and have jobs. Most moving in have nothing except a dream. Also companies are fleeing CA right now. One of the most common destinations is TX.

Kinda like MN had a lot of industry at one time. Then a certain political group got in control, taxes went nuts and companies fled the state.

Gotta remember that the former president in calling for higher taxes and raising the minimum wage claimed that almost 50% of America is on government assistance. If you were drawing SS payments you were counted as being on assistance. Really? You paid in and now they are calling it welfare? Actual numbers drawing some type of public assistance is about 35%.

Rick


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Harvestin Hay: The Early Years (Part 2) - by Pat Browning. The summer of 1950 was the start of a new era in farming for our family. I was thirteen, and Kathy (my oldest sister) was seven. At this age, I believed tractor farming was the only way, hot stuff -- and given a chance I probably would have used the tractor, Dad's first, a 1936 Model "A" John Deere, to go bring in the cows! And I think Dad was ready for some automation too. And so it was that we acquired a good, used J. I. Case, wire tie hay baler. In addition to a person to drive th ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy