Re: Farmall 140 - Belly or Rotary Mower?
[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Tractor Talk ]
Posted by Fred on September 29, 1998 at 06:07:36:
In Reply to: Farmall 140 - Belly or Rotary Mower? posted by Bob on September 27, 1998 at 18:24:47:
: Now I have a question that might cause quite a stir: : Because (from what I've been told), the Farmall 140 has neither a 2 or 3 PT hitch, I have a decision to make. : Should I fit the tractor with a 3 PT hitch using a conversion kit or get my hands on a WOODS belly mower? : The reason I ask is because I use the tractor to: cut about 5 acres in VT. Since I get up there only 2 - 4 times per mowing season, the current mowing deck is taking a real beating fighting that overgrown acreage. The belts and pully alike are constantly getting bogged down. : My thinking was that with the 3 PT hitch conversion kit, I could use a rotary cutter and really "attack" the growth. I've been told, however, that the conversion kit would be a real pain, in part, because the PTO is so high and to the left. : Someone else suggested that the WOODS belly mower would be far more effective than the GATOR I am currently using. : Being a novice to tractors in general, I'll rely upon you advises..... : Thanks, : Bob I believe that Woods also makes a pull behind rotory mower that hooks onto the drawbar and is powered by the PTO. So now you have a third option. The only drawback on this system is that there is no way to raise the cutter as a three point hitch would do. The cutter is fully adjustable for height. I have a nice Super C that I would like to mow with but, it is set up just like your Super A. So I am considering this mower.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|