The companies want the government to train their workers, PLUS cut their taxes. As I see it, you can have one or the other, but not both. I never said a WORD about RAISING taxes...but it's hard to INCREASE training at government expense, at the same time you're cutting funding for education and training. Looks like you want it both ways, too.
I think that the companies should go back to training workers, the way they did not so many years ago...instead of complaining that "it's somebody else's job to do that."
The key is, FIRST you train them...THEN you PAY THEM WHAT THEY'RE WORTH. They wouldn't leave to work somewhere else if you paid them what they're worth...because they ARE worth more money, apparently, to the OTHER guy. If THE COMPETITION thinks they're worth more money, why wouldn't the company who trained them think so, too? If a trainee does a substandard job, they don't get certified...and as a probationary employee, even if your company has a union, you can still be fired for substandard work. Saw that happen all around me when I worked at the frame plant. Lots of "probies" who didn't do a good job were here today, gone tomorrow.
Liability? There's insurance for that...and always has been. Train 'em right, and that's not a concern. There's no less liability for a newbie employee than there is for one who's been trained wrong, even if they're trained somewhere else.
I think your arguments are bogus. You want smaller government that costs less, but you want them to pick up the tab for the training that business USED to do on their own. Who pays for that? Oh, yeah...THE TAXPAYER...whether it's the individual of the business, the TAXPAYER foots that bill. Why should I, as a taxpayer, pay to train YOUR workers, just because you WON'T pay to do it? Let the folks who buy your products ultimately pay for their training...and if I don't buy your products, then I don't pay your business expenses.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Harvestin Hay: The Early Years (Part 2) - by Pat Browning. The summer of 1950 was the start of a new era in farming for our family. I was thirteen, and Kathy (my oldest sister) was seven. At this age, I believed tractor farming was the only way, hot stuff -- and given a chance I probably would have used the tractor, Dad's first, a 1936 Model "A" John Deere, to go bring in the cows! And I think Dad was ready for some automation too. And so it was that we acquired a good, used J. I. Case, wire tie hay baler. In addition to a person to drive th
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.