Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Myth Or True?


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Jerry/MT on December 12, 2011 at 10:47:19 from (206.183.116.145):

In Reply to: Myth Or True? posted by Rdandersom on December 12, 2011 at 07:08:55:

I don"t think it matters whether you use horses or tractors to farm. It"s managing in such away that you don"t carry a big debt load. The old timers didn"t start out with 2000 acre farms. They wisely built up their holdings when it made sense to do so and had the money to pay for it and they tried to stay away from debt.

Some modern farmers want to start big so they borrow, buy new machinery, in many cases oversized to their needs, and finance it by borrowing. Since the margins are slim, it takes many acres of production to just cover the debt payments. If the price drops or the costs rise, or both, there isn"t enough $"s to cover the debt payments and now they end up borrowing more to pay that. That"s a recipe for disaster and it"s just plain nuts. It"s just like what our national government is doing.

All these university economists say you have to get bigger but that"s because their models don"t see the downsize to "bigness". The ecomomies of scale are often overshadowed by the difficulty in profitably managing "bigness" and their models don"t allow for this. They assume a "perfect world".

Look at all these mergers of industrial companies. I challenge you to show how all these mergers have realy made these companies any better. They end up spinning off companies and divisions because they can"t really effectively manage vast numbers of people and make money. Their money is made selling off parts of the busimness not by integrating and effectively managing the whole shebang! The management difficulties overshadow any gain from the "economies of scale".
Look at Russia. Their collective farms were analogus to mega farms. Their "central planning" ruined them and they couldn"t even feed their own people i some minimum fashion. Their workers wee just paid help who got paid whether they worked hard or not.

Family farms were probably the most efficent farms because everyone had a stake in the outcome and nothing was guaranteed. There was a great deal of incentive to innovate and make a profit- you wanted to eat and have a roof over your head! Even then it was a crap shoot. It never was for the faint of heart.

When farms have to hire lots of outside labor or spend tremendous dollars to mechanize on the thin margins avaiable to farming, it becomes an even bigger crapshoot to make money.
i"ve done it again. I got on my soap box. Sorry guys.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Women and Tractors - More Views From the Farmer's Wife - by Teri Burkholder. The top ten reasons why the judges wouldn't let you participate in the stock antique tractor pull: Hey, this is stock! It came with that V8 in it! That "R" on my tires stands for "really old" not radial! Blue gas? We thought it was a pretty color! What wire hooked to my throttle? ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy