Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Sorry! Our Phone System is Down. Please use our Contact Us Form.

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board

misconceptions in dispute between george and I


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Hugh MacKay on February 11, 2008 at 05:11:58 from (209.226.247.46):

First let me say, George and I have exchanged e mails over night. See Scotty, it does strenghten your argument that George and I are concerned for the well being of each other.

Unlike most of you, I never believed IH did many things right. In fact I think they did a damn poor job of listening to their customers. You must understand, I've yet to see what I considered to be the perfect tractor, it hasn't been built as of 2008. I've also never seen a tractor that didn't have at least one feature I liked. Had IH done things right, my dad and I wouldn't have had to listen, (1946 to 1954) to the Cockshutt dealer two miles away, chirping up that he could sell us IPTO, all be it a clumsy tractor alongside a Farmall. I could have accepted fast hitch had I a rigid drawbar for trailing implements. 656, 666 and 686 could have had a non freewheeling TA, every manufacturer had that by the mid 60s.

Back to George and the SA, SC, H, etc. dispute. I've never said a SA would work alongside a SC and keep up, and I've never suggested a SC would work alongside a H and keep up. In 1951, less then $200. seperated a SA and SC and less than $200. seperated a SC and an H on purchase price. Most of the complaints I've heard about SC were the torque tube and engine were not rugged enough for the added wheel base over and above the SA. Most agreed the SC should have had more power. Having said that how much would it have added to the price of a Super C to beef up the torque tube, added frame rails same as H and M and finally changed the crank and rods to give C-135 engine. Most of my neighbors buying new 200 and 230 added a 1/2" plate 6" wide from clutch housing to front bolster. Some continued it to rear end to beef up the torque tube. My point is for probably the same dollars, IH could have made the C, SC, 200 and 230 a much better tractor for all around use.

What I do appologize to George for is not making myself clear enough on this stand. I know George would have liked a C-135 in his SC, 200 or 230. I'm almost betting he wouldn't frown on frame rails or a heavier torque tube either. Speaking of new tractors, I did ask George how he'd like to cultivate tobacco with a 2008 model, not being able to see the ground within 10' of tractor. I'm interseted to see his responce on that. I know some you will say tobacco is on it's way out. (maybe) I'm hearing new uses for tobacco. At any rate potato growers are still cultivating and will be into the future. Potatoes don't stay underground, one must keep burying them.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Talk of the Town: Repairin a Gas Tank - by Staff. This interesting discussion is from the Tool Talk Discussion Forum. Remember that safety is your first priority - make sure you know what you are doing before attempting a potentially dangerous activity! ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy