Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board

Re: Make you a deal, Hugh


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Hugh MacKay on May 25, 2007 at 03:24:40 from (216.208.58.113):

In Reply to: Make you a deal, Hugh posted by BOBM25 on May 24, 2007 at 05:52:45:

Bob: My gosh I couldn't make a deal like that, one never knows what he may want to say in tractor discussions. To start with I did not critize your choice as best tractor, but rather just the statment, "SMTA being ahead of it's time". If you go back to the original thread and look at my choice of favourite tractor, it's not a lot different from yours. I said, "I choose letter series Farmalls for looks and styling and 56 series Farmalls for looks, styling and function." There is just something I like better about 56 over 66 series styling.

Getting back to tractor discussion and arguments, you shouldn't take this so serious. I have a fried here in Ontario, he has met both myself and Gene Bender. He does a a commedy monologue of Gene and I arguing about how red the red tractor is. I don't know as gene has heard it but he did it here at our house one day for all my children and grandchildren to hear. Let me assure you he kept the house in a state of laughter for a few min.

I will attempt to give you a bit about my tractor philosophy. At 65 years of age, I've yet to see what I consider the perfect tractor, in my opinion it hasn't been built yet. Going back to the dozen or so mainline manufacturers of the 1950-60s. (IH, JD, Oliver, Cockshutt, MH, Case, Ford, MM, Allis, Ferguson, etc.) I've never seen a tractor built by those companies that didn't have at least one feature I liked.

On my farm and in my lifetime I've owned 16 Farmalls, (at least one every series letter through 66) 1 Deere, 2 Case and 1 Cockshutt. 90% of these choices were geared right to the quality of the dealer in the area. Those tractors were all bought new or very close to new. We had an IH dealer with a parts inventory that was unbelieveable. We had a decent Oliver, Case, Cockshutt, MH-MF and Ford dealer. In the early days the rest were non existant. In later years Deere and Allis came on with decent dealers for the area.

Over the years I tried out in demonstrations many tractors. We (my dad and I) were dairy farmers and as early as late 40s he was looking for Independant live PTO. Oliver and Cockshutt had it, but the dealers did not have big market share. Those tractors had brute strength, but they were also a bit on tha clumsey side, just not quite as agile or nimble as a Farmall. In 1955, I tried to talk my dad into buying an Oliver Super 77 diesel rather than the Farmall 300 gas. Dad didn't listen, 3 years later the Oliver dealer was gone.

As for TA, I liked it, only ever rebuilt one with under 10,000 hours of service, that being the 300 as we couldn't get dad to remember the TA would free wheel in low. He'd be interested in his baling and forget all about his gear selection until it started free wheeling then throw the TA lever ahead. The annoying part about TA is IH could have put many more dollars into R&D on TA, they were a rich company in the mid to late 50s.

On the 1066 issue, great tractor in it's day, however I belive all 100hp+ two wheel drive tractors are inefficient. Here was my beef with 1066, and this would apply to any make. I bought it with single 20.8x38, cab and air. Those two tires will not transfer 130 hp to a drawbar pull, thus I added 20.8x38 duals. The first tires lasted 1,000 hours, the duals went well over 8,000 hours,but I had a new problem, duals like going straight ahead, thus it beat the hell out of brakes and front end. Today most tractors in that hp class are running with duals and front drive, and that front drive greatly improves turning under heavy load. Those big tractors also need the 24" front tires. Once my 1066, with duals and 25" cultivator making close to 6 mph, front wheel dropped in a soft hole. By the time the operator got stopped the front wheel and bottom of spindle were under the cultivator.

As I see it if your going to add duals and front drive to the conventional tractor you may as well go articulated. Just last year I was operating 3 different 350 hp articulateds. Those tractors are amazing in my opinion, will turn shorter on a headland than at 1066 or a 4430, and will do it at 5mph with no braking, and about as smooth as anything I've seen. I told the owner of these big articulateds, these things are just as agile and quick as my Farmall 140.

So you see I was never married to my farm tractor manufacturer, I try to look at the merrits as well as the pitfalls on any given piece of farm equipment. The bottom line was it had to make money or it wouldn't be around, or at least there wouldn't be another one come to the farm. I do hope you can see my point of view.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
: :

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Ford N-Series Transmission/Hydraulic Fluid - The Full Story - by Llamas. The transmission fluid in an “N”:-series tractor lubricates the transmission, differential, rear wheel bearings, PTO and hydraulic pump drive, and it also cats as the working fluid for the hydraulic lift. In 9N/2N models, it also lubricates the steering sector and shaft system. The owner’s manual for the 9N and 2N models specified the use of only two fluids. They were STRAIGHT MINERAL OIL SAE 90 (above freezing) and ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy