Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
TimB from MA

03-06-2007 09:12:19




Report to Moderator

First, thanks for the reply's to my question last week about how many amps could safely go though 2 linear feet of No. 6 copper. Second, sorry for being short on details.

I was planning to look at welder of which I knew little except it was bigger (power-wise) than my AC-225. I did end up buying it. I was hoping to keep it in the same place and use the same plug.

That ain't going to work.

The welder is a Idealarc TIG 300/300; It is physically too big to use where my current plug is, so I will be installing a new hook-up to the back of the garage (about a 25-30 foot run).

I have some questions:

The machine tag says it draws 106 amps, and recommends a 150A breaker and No. 3 copper wire (rated for 75 degrees C). Based on NEC/NEMA charts you all linked me to last week, a 109 amp draw ought to use No. 2 wire, and if we base it on the 150 amp circuit, it ought to have 1/0 wire. Can they recommend the thinner wire based on non-continuous use, i.e., the 60% duty cycle ?

The recommended wire chart in the owners manual (see link, I hope) has a usage rate of 109 amps "With Cond." but a higer input rating of 117 amps "Without Cond." Does anyone know what the abbrieviation "Cond." stands for? "Conduit" does not make sense to me, and I don't see any reference to it in the manual.

Lastly, I plan to use a 120 amp breaker rather than the 150 recommeded (I doubt I will ever use the maximum power range on this maching which is 125 to 375 amps DC welding) Anyone see any issues with using a 120 amp breaker?

Thanks again.

Tim

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Tim B from MA

03-07-2007 06:32:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
Thanks again to all for your help.
Tim



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

03-06-2007 21:31:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
As was mentioned, a welder is a special device, & does not run continously. Therefore, the wires to it can be a bit smaller ga than a regular outlet wired up to run a motor or other continuous load.

Remember than in the future - this run of 3ga wire is only for a welder - you can't try to change it to a 150 amp draw for other things in a few years. :)

Welders have special instructions, and what is written in the manual should be good to go - even if it is outside what the 'regular' rules of the NEC are, you are falling into a special use situation.

--->Paul

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
sdloy

03-06-2007 18:44:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
I have a 300/300TIG It's an old dinosaur and draws a lot of juice. With my experience with this machine you will need the big breaker and the big wire it requires. It seems to require a lot of power even in the lower ranges. Loy



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bus Driver

03-06-2007 15:27:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
To state my earlier information another way, Article 110.3(B) of the NEC : "Installation and Use. Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling." Differing from those instructions is a violation of the NEC in jurisdictions which has adopted the NEC as law.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

03-06-2007 15:13:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
The breaker is for short circuit protection which is altogether different than overload protection. The breaker is just there for isolation while performing maintenance and to trip during a dead short. The welder's internal protection provides the thermal overload protection. Primary conductor varies with the welder's duty cycle. If the welder has a 60% duty cycle and a 106Amp primary. Then max primary amps of 106 X .78 =82.68 amp conductor. The max breaker size is 200% of the conductor size. So #2 SOW cable will be required for the welder's flexable cord. And #4 RW75 copper is fine from the breaker panel to the welder plug. A 150amp breaker should be fine and 175A is legal. Your welder sounds a lot like my Hobart unit.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tim B from MA

03-07-2007 06:31:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to buickanddeere, 03-06-2007 15:13:46  
Thanks buick, good info.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
135 Fan

03-06-2007 15:06:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
Yes, I would say that Cond. means for power factor correction. Look on any Lincoln single phase welder and they will have 2 model numbers. One without and one with power factor correction. I had a smaller Tig welder hooked up to a 60 amp breaker even though it could draw more amps. The electrician that hooked it up said that's when duty cycle comes into play. If was set up for continuous use it would need a bigger breaker. About the highest duty cycle you can get when manual welding is around 70% and you have to be really fast to achieve that. Burning big rods one after the other and no clean up at all. I think you would be fine with a 120 breaker if you have that much amps coming in. I think most standard service is 100 amps but farms can have 200 or higher depending on its needs. You have to pay extra to get higher capacity. Dave

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tim B from MA

03-07-2007 06:29:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to 135 Fan, 03-06-2007 15:06:03  
Hi Dave,

I had a small addition put on my house a few years ago, and had the service increased to 200 amp - mainly for the jacuzzi tub and because I knew I was getting a welder sooner or latter.

The new houses they build in town are rather large and 200 amp seems to be the norm these days - no extra charge for the bigger service.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bus Driver

03-06-2007 14:30:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
The with and without "cond" might mean power factor correction capacitors (condensors). My largest welder does have the capacitors. The NEC does not make a distinction between cable and conduit for the Table 310.16 ampacity table.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bus Driver

03-06-2007 14:01:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
Welders are in the NEC article 630. Special rules. The short answer is to follow the instructions with the welder.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Vern-MI

03-06-2007 12:32:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
"Cond." means conduit and the wire runs hotter inside conduit than in open air so the rating is reduced for wires run in conduit.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tim B from MA

03-06-2007 14:11:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to Vern-MI, 03-06-2007 12:32:55  
Hi Vern,

That's not what the chart does. The input amperage and the recommended breaker size goes UP in the "without cond." columns. As does the recommended wire size.

If it meant "without conduit", I would think you would not have to worry as much about heat building up, I would think all the amperages would stay the same, but you could go DOWN in wire thickness.

I think it has something to do with how the machine is put together.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tim B from MA

03-06-2007 09:28:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
The recommended electrical connection chart I refer to above is on Page 6 of the pdf file by-the-way.

Note, when I checked to make sure my link worked, I noticed that manual had been updated in 1988(same manual number as the one the former owner gave me IM-265-A), and that the input amps and recommneded wire size had been down-sized for the "With Cond." machines, which apparently means "With P.F. Capacitor" according to the updated chart. Does this sound right for being the same as "Cond."?

Note that the cover of the manual (my hard copy and the pdf file) says to use another manual for machines made before Feb 1971. My machine was apparently made in 1975. The owner gave me what appears to be the original quote he got from teh welding supplier - it was written in Dec. 1975.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
IH2444

03-06-2007 09:27:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to TimB from MA, 03-06-2007 09:12:19  
I believe 120 amps is still too much for #6. always go big, safer that way and better on the equipment.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tim B from MA

03-06-2007 09:29:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: UPDATE - Amps through No. 6 wire in reply to IH2444, 03-06-2007 09:27:31  
Forgot to mention, I do plan to use No. 3 wire for the new circuit.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy