Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

John T property lines

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
RLH

01-09-2007 03:13:43




Report to Moderator

Thanks for your advice below . Would you adress the issue of established fences and property lines for many years? Every coffee shop has a know it all who says a fence for 20 years makes a legal boundry./a Green co neighbor




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Eric SEI

01-09-2007 19:08:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: John T property lines in reply to RLH, 01-09-2007 03:13:43  
I have heard of cases where when a fence wasn't on the property line the owner being encrouched upon just bulldozed out the evidence and built a new fence. It does make for a difficult case.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
IH2444

01-09-2007 09:40:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: John T property lines in reply to RLH, 01-09-2007 03:13:43  
a question on surveys, is acreace surface area or vertical (downward) view area. Not the same thing unless the area in question is flat.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T

01-09-2007 09:54:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: John T property lines in reply to IH2444, 01-09-2007 09:40:42  
Its what you describe as the vertical view, heck if it were surface area on some of the steep hillside acres I've owned 10 acres would be 100 in surface area wooooo o hooooo ooo.

John T



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T Country Lawyer

01-09-2007 08:38:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: John T property lines in reply to RLH, 01-09-2007 03:13:43  
RLH, I used to own farms n farm there in Greene County in the seventies until I got ran out of town on a rail as my name wasnt Sparks, Carmichael, Hayes, Hasler or Helms lol. I owned the old Keith Warren farm out east of town on Warren Rd 175 E and then all that Richland Creek bottom north of 54 and west of the Wilson Bridge. My son recently married a good Greentucky girl (what I tease her about)

Okay, what them coffee shop dudes have to say bears a lot of truth and basis in law. I cant cover here what there are books written on and volumes of well settled common law but will toss out some basics. Out in the rural areas if there was an established fence line that was used n treated like the boundary for years i.e. each neighbor tilled/mowed right up to it and it was maintained n used as the boundary, that in effect over the years and provided all the statutory and/or common law requirements have been met HAS RIPENED INTO THE BOUNDARY by a legal doctrine known as "Adverse Possession". The keys are its use and the passage of time (20 yrs typical).

Basically if landowner A say farms or mows or treats as if it were his own and in a manner consistent with the ordinary use the land is suitable for on land that belongs to B and the use is Hostile Open Continuous Exclusive Adverse and Notorious for the statutory period of years and B sits on his - - - and does nuttin about it A could bring legal action and claim ownership of the land pursuant to the doctrine of Adverse Possession and if he prevails in Court that land judicially becomes his. Its kinds like whats known as "Squatters Rights" The law is not to award squatters but to punish landowners who sit on their rights for 20 years and do nothing, its kinda like "hey if you know n see somethign illegal or tresspass then come to court and complain and we will help you BUTTTTT TTTTT if you sit on your rights all those years and dont take the initiative n do something DONT COME RUNNING TO US ITS TOO LATE and if B comes to us we may award him the land SO THERE lol.

If the use is with permission, however, then B cant claim it was adverse (A let him do it) in which place B's case is weakened. i.e. if the use is allowed its NOT adverse. The use has to be without permission where A is aware of it and does NOTHING to prevent it yet never actually grants permission. If your neighbor is mowing or tilling your land its best if you EITHER claim tresspass and stop it (sheriff or legal action etc) or else get good admissible evidence n proof (like certified US mail return receipt) it was with your permission (not adverse) BUTTTTT TTTT THATS NOT THE ABSOLUTE BEST NOR FOOLPROOF, for some good lawyer to atatck, best to PUT AN END TO IT..... .....

NOWWWWW WWW I have bought n sold a few farms over the years and once they were surveyed and the old fence lines used as the effective boundaries I NEVER ENDED UP WITH THE ACRES CALLED OUT IN MY DEEDS yet there was sure nuttin I could do about it (generally speaking and subject to a bunch of other law) and as youre aware legal descriptions call out x acres MORE OR LESS.

Im NOT a surveyor but basically when a rural survey is made to stake out a legal description on a deed the surveyor will show n plat drive stakes OF WHAT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION sets out BUTTTTT TT he will show n indicate fence Lines. His survey nor attorneys or landowners determine the legal boundary, thats a function of the Courts. the surveyor is qualified and competent to render an expert opinion however.

SOOOOO OOOO those old fence lines provided how they were used n treated and the neighbors actions over the years can pretty much indeed becoem the legal boundary REGARDLESS what your deed shows or says or a surveyor does but still subject to a huge body of law. Dont even think you can have a survey made n tell your neighbor
hey 50 feet of that land over the fence over there on your side is now mine and get by with it as a strict matetr of lawwwww ww BUTTTTT TTT if you get by with it and tear that old line down and then use it adversely for 20 years heck it could eventually become yours !!!!! !!!!

You have old tractors???? We know each other??? Im guessing youre one of those Greene County families I mentioned above lol e mail me if you like jmn50@msn.com

Ol John T and all, retired EE from Crane now the Country Lawyer here in Monroe County

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Walt Davies

01-09-2007 08:35:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: John T property lines in reply to RLH, 01-09-2007 03:13:43  
Under Oregon state (as I learned in real estate school) the proprty line can be established if niether party new the differance for more than 20 years. But that's real hard to prove. I once had 80 acres in southern oregon and a neighbor had took over several acres on a far corner. when i fenced him off he complained and pointed out the law. I new better as the property line was well established and he just took over the corner for his own use because no one before had complained about it.
When I told him to stuff it and get his building off my land he backed right down and moved it. the biggest problem with doing this on a list that is nation wide is that the law is different in every state.
In California you run into those old Spanish land grants whee they say the line is as far as a man can ride a horse in two days. now that sure can open to debate.
In the east they used a lot of corners that were marked by the big Oak or some other land mark. these can be difficult because the land mark may not be there after several hundred years.
In the eastern states with old deeds that were made more by point to point than actual degrees and chains and such you can get into real fun trying to figure out who owns what.
Out here in the west we were setup to use the newer system of actual lines that are established on a map rather than the land so it becomes a lot easier to find the point of which your land is lay out. also we have perminant markers at the intersection of every section. there is one on the NE corner of my property. That is a corner that can not be argued about as it has the US Government marker set down many years ago as the section corner. When they do surveys out here they like to start at one of these markers to be sure of their calculations. There has been more law suits over property lines than almost any other thing. Now with the GPS system coming into use there is going to be even more of them. Walt

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mike (WA)

01-09-2007 08:27:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: John T property lines in reply to RLH, 01-09-2007 03:13:43  
In Washington, if a fenceline is in place for 10 years and is treated as the boundary by both property owners, it becomes the boundary. Trick is to prove both prior owners treated it as the boundary, since one or both is usually dead (obviously, one of the present owners is not agreeing it is the boundary, or you wouldn't have the dispute in the first place). Judges here will almost always rule in favor of the fenceline, because most of the old surveyed lines here, especially in the mountainous areas, are several feet off.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

01-09-2007 05:44:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: John T property lines in reply to RLH, 01-09-2007 03:13:43  
Wire fence-lines don't mean much here in New York. Such fence lines are often NOT put on property lines - to avoid disputes. Often set 10 or 20 feet off. On the other hand, many rock-wall fence lines date back 200 years and are mentioned in deeds as property lines. Same goes with large trees that appear to be in "no man's land" and never get touched during logging. On the part of the surveyor - it's his job to follow deeds back as far as needed to find such references. Easiest way to find out what the current thinking of courts and judges is - to do a simple case-law search though a legal database, e.g. Lexus-Nexus, and search with the name of your state and/or county, along with "fence lines", "property lines", etc. You find detailed accounts of court findings on these matters. If this stuff was simple, we wouldn't constantly hear about one court finding one way, and then, on appeal, the higher court reversing.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy