Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

cameras

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
coflyboy

12-27-2006 10:17:23




Report to Moderator

I'm going to get a digital camera for general purposes and also for closeups (tractor parts, etc.) I could use your collective knowledge and experience.




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
kyhayman

12-27-2006 15:49:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
I'd get a 'better' point and shoot with zoom. Any of the big names have good cameras to choose from for under $400 that will do fine. No reason to get a dslr and have to fool with the lenses for what you have in mind. The group I shoot with is full of Canon guys (but also we all use dslr's too). Only thing I see is the cheaper lenses. With a fixed lense camera thats not a concern. I'm a holdout, since my first commercial shoot, in 1989, sold to a magazine that I am sure is on the filter here, I've used exclusively Olympus stuff.

Any of the Olympus Stylus series are awesome point and shoot digitals. One of my friends got sent to India on short notice and she got a Stylus 500 at Walmart. Less than $300. 5MP is plenty for anything smaller than 8x10 prints. The new Stylus 1000 is even weather proof (which would have saved me a thousand bucks if my E-1 was) The image sensor and software in the Stylus 500 is almost comparable to what my EVolt 300 DSLR 8.1MP (and as good as my E-1 5.0MP which is my main portrait camera) will do and she spent megabucks less than I did, lol. Of course the money on the DSLRs is in the glass. Thats one of the main advantages to Canon or Nikon, if you want a DSLR instead of a point and shoot, just so much selection of affordable lenses.

Just remember, megapixles arent everything. Its like measuring horsepower. Theres a lot more to a great camera than the dots.....

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
mj

12-28-2006 15:32:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to kyhayman, 12-27-2006 15:49:24  
third party image

Ditto on Olympus.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Coloken

12-27-2006 13:09:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
Welcone back to sunney Colorado. Many opinions---I will only add that if you do any wild life, then the 10 or 12 power, but be sure it has image stabilization, other wise you should use a tripod, only 3 or 4 available there. I've yet to have anyone explain, realy explain, why more that 3 or 4 mega pixles are needed, unless a real profesional with some kind of super printer. And oh yea, buy a card reader for the memory and forget hooking the camera up to the computer. Kennyp, not quite snowed in.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
coflyboy

12-27-2006 17:58:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to Coloken, 12-27-2006 13:09:30  
I'm still in Port Isabel Ken. Kinda nice down here.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Coloken

12-27-2006 21:46:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 17:58:33  
You lucky daug. Case no body told you,it snowed.
Their cleaning out the stores of milk, bread etc again tonight for tomorrows new storm. Your ISP says broomfield...how you do that?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
coflyboy

12-28-2006 17:47:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to Coloken, 12-27-2006 21:46:34  
Don't know Ken. I live in Green Mountain Falls. Signed up with Earthlink DSL. Went to Port Isabel. No DSL here so went to Earthlink dial-up (slooowww). After 20 hours they charge a buck an hour so I switched to some free AOL.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Howard H.

12-27-2006 13:36:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to Coloken, 12-27-2006 13:09:30  

On the megapixel question, more pixels gets you more ability to zoom in.

Our older 2.1 Megapixel Kodak would print full page photo quality pictures. So in that sense - you are right - who needs more pixels??

But if you want to crop out half a pic because of sunspots, trash in the yard, etc, and concentrate on the "good" part, with more pixels, the better chance you'll have to zoom in, still print a big print, and not see pixelization.

Even if you don't want to print, it is very handy (especially in the context of the original question for equipment closeups), to be able to zoom in and see wiring details, cracks in the block, size imprints in the tire, or whatever...

Also - IMHO - not all megapixels are the equal. Different camera manufacturers may be better or worse at how they capture and how they use the pixels the camera grabs.

Howard

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Janicholson

12-27-2006 12:26:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
I teach digital graphics (university) 8 Megapixels is good, and adjustable to lower res if needed. I like Prosumer level cameras with primary zoom being optical. Sony, Panasonic, Fuji, Canon, and Nikon all make nice units. Close (macro) shots are impossible with a snapshot type camera. Focusing to 100mm or less is desirable for shots of those hoged out keyways. JimN



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
earlschieb

12-27-2006 11:20:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
third party image

Which camera depends on what you are wanting out of the picture quality, distance from the object that you are taking a picture of, and of course, how much money do you want to spend. ..... I have 5 digital cameras that we use around here, a Panasonic FZ50, 10.1 megapixel, with the 12 power optical zoom, a Pentax E10, 6 megapixel, with a 3 power optical zoom, a Samsung Digimax D53, 5 megapixel with 3 power optical zoom, a Kycera S5R, 5 megapixel with 3 power optical zoom, and a Hewlitt Packard 612, 2.3 megapixel with the 3 power optical zoom on it. ..... ..... . I recomend at least a 5 megapixel camera, with at least a 3 power optical zoom, for general useage. ..... .. The optical zoom works like binoculars do, actually brings the object closer to you, digital zoom does nothing but distort your picture quality in my opinion. As far as a memory card for your camera, I would go with at least a 512mb on a 5 megapixel camera, that will let you store about 225 pictures, or a little more, depending on your picture quality setting on your camera..... ..... I use my Kyocera S5R for my ebay listings, then downsize the pictures to about an 850 x 850 for faster down loading on my dial up connection..... .....The 10.1 megapixel Panasonic FZ50, I bought it for a trip we had taken, and now have it for sale on Craigslist.org. This picture was taken from a distance of 3/4 of a mile away, not using all of the 12 power optical zoom, on the Panasonic FZ50.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Vern-MI

12-27-2006 11:07:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
Fuji Finepix F30, 6.3 megapixel is a very nice camera but costs about $260 before buying the nickel metal hydride batteries and memory card. 1 gig memory cards are about $25 on sale. The LCD display on the back has 215,000 pixels and auto adjusts for the light. It is very clear and can be seen in direct sunlight.

The Kodak Easyshare C743 is 7.1 megapixel and costs about $160 ($130 with $50 discount on $150 purchase at OfficeMax). It has an LCD display which has 110,000 pixels so it is decent with some grainyness. I have taken close up shots to within 3 inches and they turned out very well. The SD memory cards in the 1 gig format are about $15 and it can take about 500 pictures before filling the card. requires two AA rechargeable batteries which can be had for about $20 with charger.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
old

12-27-2006 10:59:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
I use a cheap W-al-mart one and it does just fine. Cost me all of $15-17 and that included tax. Its also a web cam and is small enough to fit in your pocket.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RustyFarmall

12-27-2006 10:55:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
I use a Kodak DX3500. It is only 2.2 megapixels, but does an excellent job with both close-ups and distance shots. I've had this camera for a few years now, might no longer be available.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dean Barker

12-27-2006 10:54:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
We like our Kodak EasyShare DX4900. It is a 4 mega pixel. It is 3 or 4 years old now so probably has been replaced with a newer model. It is easy to use and always works.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
neblinc

12-27-2006 10:53:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
The link below will help narrow down your search.

Randy



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Vern-MI

12-27-2006 10:42:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to coflyboy, 12-27-2006 10:17:23  
What will be the nearest close up focal distance that you will be needing. How many inches away?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
coflyboy

12-27-2006 17:55:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: cameras in reply to Vern-MI, 12-27-2006 10:42:35  
I think JimN's number of a 100 mm is close to what will work for what I intend to do. My old slr film Pentax had a macro lense with about that capability and I rarely needed more. However, I was not shooting as close then as I might now. I just have not learned digital cameras and their capabilities as compared to film cameras.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy