Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

Today's pickups

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Old, working an

06-22-2005 08:11:42




Report to Moderator

I'm in the market for a newer pickup. I use it on the farm to do jobs that are too small to bother waking up my truck for. Of course, I am shocked by sticker prices so I look in the used car lots. I am really getting dissapointed by what I find. There is nothing but what I call city pickups out there. They all have extended cabs, short boxes, and ridiculously fancy cabs. I'm looking for a working pickup not a car and all I find is used pickups that the manufactors duped the young buyers into buying.(it is really silly how the young are so vulnerable to propaganda, I truly would be embarresed to drive such a silly pickup)
To top it off these pickups look like they have never done a days work. What a waste of the worlds raw materials. And to think, these are the people who called the older generation hyprocrits back in the 60s and 70s.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Nolan

06-23-2005 05:55:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Trying to find a truck with a real bed is quite a challenge today. It's all about cab space, and the bed is an afterthought.

That said, father-in-law bought a standard cab 4x4 Tundra about 2 years ago. He's a Toyota fanatic, and wanted to get a larger truck. Like you, he hated the fact that it had to come with velure bucket seats, fancy carpeting etc. I understand his concerns, because this truck was going to get used on his swamp trap lines and such.

Here it is some two years later. Lots of muck and mud have gone into that truck, but surprisingly, it still looks good. It washes out just as easily as straight vinyl, and is a whole lot more comfortable.

Driving it, it's a pleasure. Smooth ride, decent handling, etc. That's quite nice.

Single strong gripe, and it's a real one, is the flimsy bed. It's the same bed as either Ford or Chevy uses, and it isn't made for working. I've bent it with my bare hands, and that's pathetic.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

06-23-2005 05:14:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
About a year and a half back, I bought a new Dodge 2500 HD with Cummins diesel/6 speed, 4WD, 4 door, power everything, towing package, and all the other ect.'s....

My son bought one almost identical, except his is a gasser (hemi/auto)

6 months later, he got a company truck. ('05 Dodge 3500 diesel)

Then my wifes car got wiped out in a wreck. We bought Jasons truck from him for the Mrs. to drive.

Both trucks are loaded. Before that, I always bought the plainest, cheapest truck I could find.

I wouldn't trade backwards for love, nor money!

I average around 55,000 miles per year on my truck. I spend a LOT of time in it. WHY NOT HAVE A NICE ONE?

I use mine as a truck. It drags around a 25' gooseneck, with a usual load of about 10,000LBS. Nothing like having a COMFORTABLE ride that'll do what a truck should do.

We take trips in the winter. A couple of the grandkids usually go along. The bigger cab is nice to say the least. If I didn't have the 4 door cab, I'd need a car to go along with the truck. How would that be any cheaper?

All in all, I'm pleased. I don't expect EVERYONE to run out and buy a $45,000 "cowboy cadillac", but I plan on buying ANOTHER someday when this one is tired and ready to be put out to pasture.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fawteen

06-23-2005 03:51:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
I guess I'm sorta in the middle here.

I LIKE power steering, power windows, delay wipers, cruise control and a decent radio.

I have 3 pickups. One of 'em is a "truck", a 1989 Chevy K3500 with a 454 and a TH400 automatic. It tows, it plows snow, it gets rode hard and put away wet, and it keeps on ticking. I live right on the ocean in Maine, not many tougher environments for rust problems, and it's got a little surface rust where the paint has been chipped, and that's it. Pretty remarkable. I'd have expected the cab corners and wheel wells to be rusted out years ago. Love that truck, hate putting gas in it, wish it had power windows and cruise.

My wife's vehicle is a '88 Dodge Dakota, V6 2wd shortbed with a cap. Nice grocery getter, good mileage, wish it had delay wipers and cruise.

My "car" is an '01 Dakota Quadcab 4x4 with ALL the bells and whistles, except it has cloth seats. Middlin' acceptable mileage, fun to drive, comfy, and completely $(%*ing useless as a "truck". No payload, 5' bed so it won't haul more than a few sacks of feed, if you try to tow anything bigger than a lawnmower trailer it feels like you're dragging the Queen Mary and the mileage reflects it. As long as I remember that it's really a "car with a REALLY big trunk" I'm fine. If I forget and try to use it like a truck, I'm always disappointed.

I bought it because the price was right, I needed 4wd, and with my screwed up back, I can't get in and out of these modern low-slung cars.

Now I ain't saying I wouldn't drive a $45,000 longbed crewcab diesel with 6 way power ashtrays, GPS, OnStar, a Bose sound system that costs more than my house, Personal Theatre, heated leather seats with built in massage, zoned climate control and my very own deeded patch of the Alaskan Oil Fields...

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
OK-AL

06-22-2005 18:39:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
This is kinda funny. Been reading the followups.

I've got a '95 Chevy 3/4 ton p/u, long bed, extended cab, 4x4, 454, towing package and absolutely no rust. It's a Silverado. Great truck.

Late last year, I decided to buy an old truck, fix it up and sell the '95. (I like old stuff.) So, I bought an old chevy, fixed it up and started driving it. Put the '95 in the picture truck ad paper. Got two people who looked at it. Left it in the paper for 5 months. Dropped the price to $200 over TRADE IN value. No one called. So I said the heck with it and i'll drive it until the wheels fall off. Which should be a long time since it's only got 90,000 miles on it now. So it's funny that you are wanting a truck so close to what I have, but I wasn't able to sell the one i've got!


Keep looking, someone out there has the truck you want for sale. It took me months to find the one i've got.

OK-AL

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mark - IN.

06-22-2005 16:24:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Check down at the grain elevator, unless want something pretty and new. Or farm auctions. Years ago I picked up a '69 K20 with a 292 and Dana 70's for next to nothing, was in great shape. Was posted at the grain elevator. Drove like a log wagon and could climb a tree, and I'm a fool for ever selling it. Just another example of why Mom tells everyone I "must be the milk ladies kid, cause is no way he could be mine". There's a mid-60's International 4x4 pickup setting a couple of blocks north of a power plant in Joliet that sure is mint. Nice head turner you when drive the little wife into town on a Saturday so she can look at pretty new dresses while you mosey on over to the elevator to shoot the bull.

Could always put yourself together one stout junk yard dawg, and paint her up nice. Registering them gets sticky though. Could call it a tractor down at DMV, I guess.

Mark

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rick YYC

06-22-2005 20:33:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: International pickups in reply to Mark - IN., 06-22-2005 16:24:17  
strange as it may sound, those old "corn binders" are now considered one of the the coolest ("sickest"???) vehicles by city kids.

Mu son's explanation was that if your parents hate it and can't understand it, it must be really cool.

R



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RB/CT

06-22-2005 15:23:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
First, thank you for the post, many thoughts and ideas offered here form experience. I will keep my 71 Chevrolet Custom Camper pickup that I restored forever, its 9 leaf spring rear and and Dana 60 with 411's, and Chevy 350 motor get the job done. Its in the pictures on this site. An old story for those who want to hear it. My uncle bought a 67 Chevrolet pickup new, drove it for 20 years and sold it for $500. He had paid $1800 for it new. those days, trucks were work vehicles, he was a finish carpenter for over 40 years. Today to buy a work truck, start at 30k, look at F350,s or whatever, they will do the job with comfort. Just look at an 05 F-150 front end, got sick when I saw the ALUMINUM A arms, no grease fittings, and what I call the "ATV" front end. Independent Macpherson Struts or other cheap junk. My 98 F-150 4.2 engine bit the dust at 80k, the crank thrust bearing went, (it was a standard) I would stay away from that engine. the only question with an older truck, that I ask myself, is: Is it ECONOMICALLY REBUILDABLE. Good luck with your truck purchase, old trucks are a part of Americana.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave in GA

06-22-2005 12:58:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
A few years ago, I was taking my rusty Twin City gas tank to the radiator shop for repairs when I stumbled across a '71 International 1/2 ton long bed parked across the road. It was a beater, an old farm truck and it had NO bells or whistles. I bought it for about $500 and it's now my farm truck. Other than a battery and a brake job, it needed very little. The small V8 gets surprisingly good mpg, and the 4-speed tranny and manual brakes work as smooth as can be. The manual steering has been tough at times, but I could get used to it. When my wife's 1990 Suburban died on an out-of-town trip in April due to a computer module problem, it was this reliable old farm truck that served as the rescue vehicle. The paint looks like baked puke, but I don't have to spend my time washing and waxing it either.

If anyone's looking for an old truck to have around, check out the Truck Trader magazines or online, and look in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. There are lots of simple old long bed trucks out there looking for a farm to live on. Ebay can be good also, especially if you can come across a truck that's nearby.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ludwig

06-23-2005 07:03:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Dave in GA, 06-22-2005 12:58:51  
How good is surprisingly good? Which engine does it have? I'd heard that the 304 was a relatively economical engine to have...
Theres an '70something IH 2wd crewcab dually near where I live for sale. I'm tempted to go look at it but I've got absolutely no need for such a thing...
The one I'd like to have is an old Scout with a 4cyl and both the full cab and half cab. That'd be a fun ride.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave in GA

06-23-2005 08:35:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Ludwig, 06-23-2005 07:03:33  
As far as the fuel mileage, I've gotten somewhere between 15-20 MPG, probably closer to 20, with some North GA mountain driving. Honestly, I don't know what size engine it is. It's either the 304 or the 345, and it has a 2-barrel. I was told that I have to get the serial number off the lower side of the block to determine if it's a 304 or a 345. After I climbed underneath and saw the 1" thick caked grease and mud covering the block, I decided to tackle that project another time, or ask my wife to do it. If you're looking at the crew cab, it probably has the 392 engine which is as strong as an ox but you pay for it at the pump. But it might have the 345 which is decent on gas. I have '65 IH 1-ton standard cab 4x4 with the 392 and it can pull a house (maybe 2) but I'm lucky to get 10 mpg. International made a lot of crew cabs and built them well.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ludwig

06-23-2005 13:41:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Dave in GA, 06-23-2005 08:35:31  
20mpg sounds great to me...
I'd love to have one with a 304 or 345 and 5spd w/granny low.
My great uncle had a '70something crew cab 2wd I think with a six cylinder but I can't prove that. We used to haul gravel with it and it'd be so loaded that the tires would rub in the wheel wells. When he finally got rid of it that truck was totally beaten to snot with rust holes everywhere. He only replaced it because my aunt said she wouldn't ride in it anymore.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ray

06-22-2005 12:00:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
I just bought a 2005 chevy 1500 4x4 pickup without all the bells an whistles for $20150.
It's called a work truck,without carpet or
powerseats or windows,no CD player,stuff I didn't want anyhow.It has a good radio,AC,runs great,just installed a gooseneck hitch,it pulls a 20 foot trailer with ease.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ludwig

06-23-2005 07:01:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Ray, 06-22-2005 12:00:18  
It doesn't have windows? Must make seeing out of the cab hard! :)

Sorry, couldn't resist that one.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bobl1958

06-22-2005 11:54:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Kinda funny, though. I posted on this site about 3 mos. ago that I traded my 3/4 ton Dodge reg cab long wheelbase truck for a 3/4 ton '02 Chevy extended cab 4X4. Dealer told me that my Dodge wasn't worth much because no one wanted the reg cab anymore. Didn't like the '02 Chevy w/ 6.0 so I traded it back in on a '03 reg cab with Duramax. Funny thing was same dealer tried to tell me that the reg cab trucks were very high in demand and the cost was showing it. lol. Anyway keep looking and you will probably find what you want. Bob

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ludwig

06-22-2005 11:43:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Are you shocked by sticker prices because its real expensive or because you can't get away from the price trucks were in the '70s?

In 1970 how much did people make per year? How much did a base model truck cost?
Today a recent college graduate can expect to make over $30k a year, and a base model truck costs a third less than that...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
earlschieb

06-22-2005 10:03:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
third party image

Well, this is interesting, I have been trying to trade this one in on a 2 wheel drive, extend cab truck, around here. This truck does work for a living most of the time, and I pull a trailer with it some. The dealers keep telling me there is no market for a long bed truck like this one is, around here. Very good truck, just has a good amount of miles on it, and everthing works, loaded to the gills with options. I have been looking for a 2000 or 2001 Ford F-150, about all I can find is the ones with a V6 or a 4.6 V8 in them, kinda looking for a 5.4 Triton in the next one.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MeAnthony

06-22-2005 09:48:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Depends on what your definition of "newer" is. Compared to my '77 Plymouth Trailduster, a mid-80's would be "newer", and this can be fulfilled by a 3/4 ton diesel Chevy from a military surplus auction. Yeah, some of them have been used hard, but they don't skimp on parts either. Would this be an option for you?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ludwig

06-23-2005 06:58:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to MeAnthony, 06-22-2005 09:48:16  
The military used Dodge pickups too. Navy ones seem to be alot less beat. A friend of mine has one and its a heckuva truck, its got 5/4 ton overload springs so it rides hard but it'll haul about anything. Painful on the highway though, the 318 isn't super powerful so they geared it down.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

06-22-2005 09:40:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
I have one of those over priced wimpy p*ssy fully loaded with everything four door 4x4 pickups. I wouldn't dream of going back to one of those old, crude, gas hog, rough riding plain pickups where an AM radio was a featured option. This truck not only keeps the dear sweet darling precious little children amused with a DVD every now and again during a long trip. It spends its fair share of time hauling equipment, fire wood and hunting gear with a trailer. Don't be afraid of technology more advanced than ignition points. Factor in the cost of inflation and today’s vehicles are a real value. Imagine 25 years ago what it would cost to have computer control, air bags, anti lock brakes, improved crash protection, reduced body rusting, gas engines that last 300,000+ miles, diesel engines that pretty much work, a decent ride and a vehicle that doesn’t feel like it’s going to roll over in a turn. About double the power when stepping on the accelerator too.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Old, working,loving it

06-22-2005 10:19:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to buickanddeere, 06-22-2005 09:40:20  
Well, an AM radio is all it takes to get the local station that carries mostly classic country. I have heard FM and all I can get is noise except when someone is talking. I have never needed 4x4 even with blizzards and mud. I don't know what you mean by gas-guzzling (how would that be relevant in a 2003 reg-pickup?). What's a DVD,(never mind I don't really care)?
As far as wimpy-p$ssy, you said it,not me.
But I sure have to agree with you about over-priced.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

06-22-2005 11:47:41




Report to Moderator
 Today's pickups - no rust and better?? in reply to Old, working,loving it, 06-22-2005 10:19:43  
I don't agree with the idea that new pickups are a "bargain" with all the extras they now come with. I find them to be way overpriced, and much of the modern ammenities mean little as far as utility goes. I've got a 1/2 ton 1982 pickup that gets better fuel mileage than any new full size truck currently offered. It has no computer controls for engine management. Yes, it DOES have a CD player that I added for $50. And, on the subject of better rust protection that Mr. Buick mentioned . . . I haven't seen much of a difference since the 80s. We've got plenty of mid-90s trucks in my area of the salt-belt that are falling apart from corrosion. Much of the cost of a new vehicle takes care of very high wages and benefit packages for workers thanks to the unions that often hold the taxpayer and consumer hostage. More expense is added because of the constant changes in EPA and safety requirements. Admittedly, trucks - by today's standards were crude until the early 80s - but since then I haven't seen much in significant changes other than initial comfort. I've got a 49 Ford with flathead Merc. V-8 - handles lousy, rides hard, low on power, gets 11 MPG highway. I also have a 69 Dodge Power-Wagon with 4:88 gears all around (4WD), 318 V-8, rides and handles terrible and gets 8 MPG best - but it's all original and the engine has never been apart. My 82 Chevy 1/2 4WD with 6.2 diesel rides and handles beautifully, has been very reliable, and has gotten up to 25 MPG on the highway. For a work truck, it's hard to improve on that. My 87 3/4 Suburban 4WD with 6.2 diesel now has 472,000 miles on it and has never been apart. It rides and handles great and gets around 20 MPG on the highway. I paid $500 for it twelve years ago - that's what I call a bargain. I've got friends who "buy" new trucks every year or so. I hesitate to use the word "buy" since they never really own the trucks - just make payments and downpayments forever. And, they rarely keep them long enough to watch the rust start to take hold. In fact, I have one friend who's a bit unhappy at the moment. He had been driving a 95 Dodge 4WD with Cummins diesel. He loves the truck, got a consistent 18 MPG on the highway, but it's starting to fall apart from rust. He tried to trade it in on a new Chevy - the dealer didn't offer him enough - so he kept the Dodge, and paid cash for a new Chevy with the Japanese Duramax diesel (thiry-something thousand dollars). So far, the best mileage he's gotten is 14 MPG. He was expecting much better with a new-technology truck. I have the same feelings about cars. My wife's 1991 Volkswagen Jetta diesel gets 50 MPG on the highway, and 38 MPG around town. We bought it ten years ago for $1500. I consider that another bargain. My son just bought his wife a new Chevy Aveo (Japanese Daewoo I believe). Cheapest car Chevy offers - but he still paid over 12,000 dollars. He's been able to get 35 MPG on the highway and it drives like a little sh*tbox. I think, dollar for dollar, and mile for mile, our Volkswagen was a better deal. (by the way, he traded in his 2000 Chevy Tahoe that was already showing rust).

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ludwig

06-23-2005 06:56:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups - no rust and better?? in reply to jdemaris, 06-22-2005 11:47:41  
Well I've got an '83 Mercedes Benz 240D that I bought for $1500. I've beaten the snot out of that car and it takes it and keeps on ticking. Sure its got issues but for a commuter its great, and frankly if you put it beside your Jetta it makes the Jetta look like a crapbox... You got be beat on mileage though I only get about 30mpg.

Anyway my Great Uncle Reg bought a Chevy 1/2 ton new in '76. By '86 it had rusted "all the way to the windshield" as we say in Maine. He had the cab welded back up and found NOS doors and a bed. By '91 the bed was falling apart, one door fell off and the cab rusted around the plates they'd welded in... He junked it and bought a used '88 GMC 1/2 ton which I still have. The cab corners rusted out on that and were replaced along with one fender on the bed. Theres a fair bit of rust now but considering its age I think its done real well. When it was junked the 350 in the '76 was fair at best. One big reason he didn't replace the body is because he figured the engine needed a rebuild. It had just under 100,000 miles. If I get up to the farm a couple more times this year the '88 will roll 100,000. Starts and runs fine, burns a little more oil than I'd like but I suspect thats because it sits alot now.
The '76 rode like a work truck, the radio sounded like you were inside a tin can if you could hear it over the wind noise. The '88 is quiet and comfortable and gets about twice the gas mileage if you can stay out of the go pedal (I've pulled 16mpg with it driving real easy, Dad held the record on the '76 at 8mpg). Both trucks were about equally good in the woods. I might give the nod to the '76 but we had to gas it up EVERY SINGLE DAY during hunting season...

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

06-23-2005 01:25:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups - no rust and better?? in reply to jdemaris, 06-22-2005 11:47:41  
I should have put "overpriced" in quotation marks. Meaning that dollar per dollar today’s trucks offer more than Chev/GMC trucks 1986 and earlier. In about 20 years someone will be going on about the virtue of their simple old reliable 2005 pickup. And how they will never consider purchasing an overpriced 2025 pickup. Until the end of 2002 we could purchase a truck here, drive it for 6 months and trade it for what we paid for it. The dash would be changed out to imperial indications and the truck shipped south. As for those people who trade trucks every year or two and drive a diesel without a load less than 30,000 miles/year. They are not interested in value. They are attempting to purchase "Status".

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

06-23-2005 06:11:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups - no rust and better?? in reply to buickanddeere, 06-23-2005 01:25:06  
I agree that often vehicles are bought for status - especially many SUVs that are used as suburban commuters. But, as far as looking back and always thinking the older stuff is better - at least with my experience, it's not true - with cars, trucks, or tractors. I've got just as many bad memories as good ones with such things. In the US, cars and trucks were at a high point of quality around 1964. Come 1973 and they were absolute crap - especially General Motors stuff. There were some awful shortcuts made to meet the new federal emission standards, and the sheet metal utilized a lot of recyled metal, and was of very poor quality. And, also, with the two so-called "fuel shortages", a rush was on to produce more fuel efficient vehicles. Disasters came forth such as Chrysler's "lean burn" engines, General Motor's Oldsmobile 350 gas engine converted to diesel, the Cadillac 4-6-8 engine, etc. The Parkerization process General Motors used on its camshafts was terrible, the Chevy Vega with aluminum cylinder bores (like a Briggs & Stratton lawn mower), etc, etc. At the same time, the Japanese were building some great stuff. My father-in-law was an engineer for Ford at the time and told me about all the headaches they had trying to make something as good as Datsun or Toyota here in the US. They had production line quality control problems along with the engineering problems. Remember when all the US auto companies were rushing to model themselves with the Japanese produciton line mentality? So, anyway, I don't think I'll ever be looking back and missing 2005 vehicles. I see it as a demise in good engineering. That, because, good engineering should include updates that offer some sort of real gain, and not just fluff. And, should also include repairability - which is disappearing. Individual OEM replacenment parts are taking a back seat to complete replacement "systems" or "modules." That because major auto companies are making less and less themselves - they go out and buy sub-assemblies. And, take a modern auto with problems. If they are not identified in the computer code, you've got a shop mechanic, more or less, p*ssing in the wind and charging $80-$100 an hour for it. This just happened with a car I bought for my daughter. 2002 Ford ZX something or other. 42,000 miles on it. Brought it home and the "check engine" light came on. As of this year in New York, any car made after 1996 with the OBDII system, cannot pass inspection with the light on - or with any error codes in memory. So, the code stated a bad rear oxygen sensor. The dealer replaced it, 20 miles later, it came on again. Dealer replaced it again, it failed again. They then replaced the converter, 20 miles later, light came on again. The dealer, (a Subaru dealer), then took the car to Ford. Ford dealer spent two hours on it at $100 per hour, and then stopped. Since the computer did not tell them, accurately, what was wrong with the car - they said all they could do is begin replacing non-returnable parts along with the $100 per hour rate. In other words, a fairly new car, was - from an economical viewpoint, unrepairable. It went to auction and I got my money back. My son just had the same experience with his 2001 Nissan Sentra - he gave up and traded it in, and the dealer also sent it to auction. I believe as time goes on, you will see much more of this with newer vehicles. One more note on nostalgia. Take the Ford Model T. If I see one more "historical" TV show that gives Henry Ford credit for the existence of the American automobile, and promotes the Model T as high tech in its time, I think I'll puke. Yes, he was a good businessman and perfected the automotive production line. And, the Model T was an afforable cheap car. But, by standards of its time, it was a crappy little car or truck and was way out of date by the mid 1920s.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
old

06-22-2005 09:22:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Guess thats why I still drive a 1980 chev, and been thinking about fixing up a 1969 chev3/4 ton



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe MD

06-22-2005 09:21:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Some people can only afford to have one or two vehicles. It is nice to have the big cab if a work truck is needed as a second car from time to time. Gonna need baby seat room in a couple of months.

I will agree that long beds are hard to come by in that configuration, but we eventually found one. For example, does ford even offer an f-150 crew cab with long bed?

I don't feel embarrased . . . just can't afford to have tons of cars on the road at the moment.

I would suggest looking here

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ShepFL

06-22-2005 09:13:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Keep looking they are out there. I waited 11 months and got mine. I have a 1990 Chevy K3500 Silverado, non dually.

Wife keeps hounding me to sell it but when I need a truck with some "GRUNT" this truck does it. Wish it had a Diesel but it has 454 which does the job.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve KS

06-22-2005 09:11:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
I'd second 1945A's comment. Contact your local utility compaines and ask them when and how the sell off their trucks. I got a '95 Ford 1/2 ton 4x4 reg cab (they also had 3/4's) base trim package but did have a/c and cruise control. Had just over 100,000 when I bought it from the auction, I've put nearly 100,000 more on it and I think I've put a total of $250 worth of parts in it since then. Hadn't ever let me down - till I couldn't stop on the ice last winter, now if I can just find a cheap front clip...

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
BobMo

06-22-2005 08:57:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Strange as though it may seem I shopped for a used 3/4 ton reg. cab long bed (4x4) for 8 months. The dealers all told me as soon as they get one its gone. I didn't care what the name was on it I'm not particuliar, just one that was decent. The Ford & Chevy dealers would go for weeks and not even have a long bed. Finally I saw a guy trading in a 2000 GMC with 80,000 on it. I drove it (I don't think it had ever been on a gravel road) paid for and left before he did. I figured it would months longer if I didn't. Strange as this is a agricultal area.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
thurlow

06-22-2005 08:50:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Last truck I bought off a lot was in 1966; every one since then..... .only been a few..... have been special ordered to my specifications. First one was $100 over dealer's cost; that has CHANGED!!! I gather you're not buying new, so this is of no help..... ..... ..... .



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Galen

06-22-2005 08:43:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Everyone has thier favorites on this one! I have a 1997 F-150 long bed Ex-cab. Over 330,00 on it with no problems. Every once in a while I see them in the "shopper" type papers or on the back of dealer lots. They USUALLY go for cheap ($2000 - $4000). I also have a 1974 F-100 that never leaves the farm. Just an old beater rust bucket. Been jumping stumps and tearing it up for years. Got it free, though.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Old, working, loving it

06-22-2005 08:42:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Thank you, I going to keep looking for awhile, but I won't buy what I don't like. There has to be a lonely old fashion pickup out there just waiting for me to come along.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bobl1958

06-22-2005 08:32:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Keep in mind that 20 years ago and even farther back there was a farmer around every corner. Now with all the farmers going broke, selling out, or retiring the #'s are considerable low in comparison. The big dealerships are going to cater to where the money and demand is. Kinda sad to see. There are still some comercial vehichles that are pretty basic if you look hard enough.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
1945 A

06-22-2005 08:29:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Have you investigated auctions or sales of vehicles used by your local municipality?
Around here (Central Texas), the local utilities will periodically sell off some of their fleet vehicles after they reach a certain mileage. Most have been pretty well maintained, and almost all are "work" trucks---rubber floor mats, plain cabs, etc. Some even have tool boxes...
Just a thought....



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scdietsche

06-22-2005 08:28:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
I'd go with a Chevy best pickup this is out there in my opinion. its seems like the only pickup that kinda still has the same look as the ones mabey 10 15 years ago. A good farm truck is always a long bed without a club cab. then depending on how much is in your pocket a 2500 Diesel would get the job done. These may be hard to find at a good price but once you find it you will never need another pickup.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dhermesc

06-22-2005 08:27:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Old, working and loving i, 06-22-2005 08:11:42  
Agreed, trying to find a "base" longbed regular cab pickup thats a 1997 or newer is almost impossible. Much less a base trim level PU with optional power trains and heavier suspension - those are on pickups tricked out for the guys who "need" to tow their boat or camper.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
mark

06-22-2005 11:11:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to dhermesc, 06-22-2005 08:27:21  
I don't understand why some folks enjoy misery. When I was a kid we had a '56 International pickup...it was nothing more than a buckboard wagon with a 6 cylinder engine it. Damned thing beat your kidneys out, was cold in the winter, hot as hades in the summer, required Charles Atlas arms to steer it and was geared so low that 52 mph was top speed. Yeah boy....real truck (not)! Same as everything else from years ago folks opine about. No AC in the house and rolling in sweat until 3 am trying to get some sleep during July and August. Sitting on the front porch in the evening..... swatting mosquitos until you retreated. B&W television and getting all of 2 channels....nothing like watching Walt Disney features in B&W. Or Marlin Perkins/Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom taking you down the Amazon River and seeing the beauty of gray forests. Uh hmm. Then back to those great old cars and trucks..... and tractors. Change the plugs and points every year...at least, because they were burnt up. Those polyester tires going thump-thump-thump until they warmed up and got the flat spots ironed out. You ever bang your head against one of those steel dashboards..back when they made 'real cars'? How about thinking a car was way over the hill when the odometer showed 100,000 miles. Pickups had fenders bolted on and they started flapping in 3 years as the mounting tbs broke off and of course, the wooden beds rotted out. Yeah boy, I remember them. ventilation was via a wing window that blew harder the faster you went....heaven forbid you were in town....or a bumblebee blew in the cab going 40 mph down the road. Anybody recall trying to coax a 6 volt anything..... especially a tractor in January, to start? Yeah man, nothing like a sulky plow, a drag disc and a sickle bar mowing machine...in heavy hay and broken pitman arm. Round bales and kickers? What's that? It was armstrong all day long. Ever try to cram 4 people in a pickup cab? Can you imagine hooking a trailer....camping, hay or cattle.....to a 1960 vintage PU with a 3 on the tree and a 250 cu. in 6 banger? HAR!

Now, you know why today's PU's have 300 horsepower, comfortable seats, ac, power steering and brakes, towing packages and a radio capable of receiving something other than the Hootin' Holler Trio brought to you by the makers of Bag Balm on WHIC AM radio. I don't begrudge my fancy PU, new JD tractor or anything else they make today. especially medicines. How many kids you hear of dying from whooping cough nowadays? measles? typhoid fever? Pneumonia? And best of all, no more trips to the stinkin' outhouse when it's 10 below!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jason Simmerman

06-22-2005 22:55:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to mark, 06-22-2005 11:11:03  
Amen Mark. I think very few of the folks don't realize that 50% the computer technology incorporated into the systems on the new trucks and cars are being mandated by the government. OBD I and II was the government's brainchild not GM's or Ford's or Chrysler's. Uncle Sam knows what he is doing. The new OBD II airbag modules act as a flight data recorder stores all vehicle parameters within a certain number of seconds prior to airbag deployment IE gauge indications and brake system status ect ect. If the government didn't push for emissions and fuel economy as much as they do why would the auto makers spend the money in development of these new overhead cam motors or variable valve timing or whatever else they have been working on. As for the rust problem. Always has been a rust problem, always will be a rust problem as long as we use Fe as a key element in the metal used on our trucks. Last I knew Fe had 6 electrons and oxygen has 2 so they like to combine and create FerricOxide (IE) rust. No way getting around the laws of nature is there? They put a protective coating on it, you scratch it, oxygen and other oxidizers IE road salt get to it can cause rust. It's not rocket science. Older trucks are alittle more heavy duty, because they had to be made that way. The engineers had to error on the side of caution when constructing the vehicle knowing somebody would overload it or the metal used on the chassis may be of an inferior grade than what they specified. Even today GM has a 25% fudge factor in the ratings of their trucks and SUV's because of this. Yes the makers have gone away from the utility uses of the trucks more and more but more and more people are buying them and not using them on a farm. Mom is using one to run the kids to and from soccer practice, or you pile the wife 2 kids yourself and the dog into it and hitch up your camper and head off on a vacation. The market for trucks has changed and will continue to change with higher and higher gas prices and smaller and smaller living spaces. I'm not ranting or trying to be offense, but it just seems some people don't see the business or political reasons behind why things happen. IE our old tractors. We are all proud as we can be about our old JD, Ford, Farmall, Allis Chalmers or whatever brand or color it might be but will it do just as good of a job with said task as a new tractor? Probiably not. Will the new tractor probiably start alot easier in the dead of winter than an Farmall Super M with the 6 volt changing system still on it?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
havvey

06-22-2005 14:31:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to mark, 06-22-2005 11:11:03  
you said it well mark been there to most of it. it was all we knew back then and times have changed ever notice doing 50 in an old ford or ihc seems like doing 100mph today. they were good product for there time though.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MPND

06-22-2005 14:22:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to mark, 06-22-2005 11:11:03  
You shoulda saved the rant for the right topic. He is asking for a plain pickup that can actually do what he wants. Old pickups dont fit that bill and most new pickups dont either because they are designed to be SUVs not pickups.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Old, working,loving it

06-22-2005 16:05:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to MPND, 06-22-2005 14:22:12  
Thank you sir. you said it better than I could have.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Gravy

06-22-2005 11:39:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to mark, 06-22-2005 11:11:03  
You got that right, Mark. Best posting I've read in weeks...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
gorilla

06-22-2005 14:54:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Gravy, 06-22-2005 11:39:25  
I had a hard time finding a new "work truck" around town. THere werent a lot of long beds to be found and everything was pretty well loaded out. I drive a chevy duramax and love it, and plan to keep it 10 years or so like most of my trucks. I dont think there is probably that much difference in a ford & a chevy all in all, but GM has the discount thing going right now. A buddy of mine has been looking and man are they knocking a chunk off. Anyway, the Gm employee discount lasts until July 5th.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Luke S

06-22-2005 15:34:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to gorilla, 06-22-2005 14:54:29  
I am a car dealer, we have a Dodge, Chrysler, Jeep store and a Chevrolet store. Probably 50% of the trucks I sell are still long beds. And probably 20% are still actual work trucks with rubber floors, vinyl seats, crank window and the like. I'll agree there are a lot of "yuppie trucks" sold these days, but here in east central Missouri we still do a lot of ranch and farm trucks. And these trucks truly are better than ever before. The prices might be going up every year, but the power, towing capacities, comfort, convenience features and all the other things also get better with every passing year.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hurst

06-22-2005 20:17:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Luke S, 06-22-2005 15:34:45  
Don't forget the safety features too. We have a train track running through our farm and a little over 2 years ago, my dad and I were hit in our 2000 F150 supercrew crossing the tracks, and the better built trucks are built for better safety along with towing and power. I wouldn't call it a woosy truck, anything that gets 2 people through something like that alive deserves some recognition. We bought a 2003 supercrew lariat to replace the old 2000 lariat that got totaled in this wreck. This truck pulls hay wagons, trailers, and carries a bunch of stuff around the farm, but we also use it as a car too, so that is where the leather and the cd player, crew cab, etc come into play. If you are looking at a ford, look at a 2004 or later, frames are MUCH stronger than the previous years' frames, and check behind the suspension for any bends or straightening jobs, that was where our 2003 bent when it was rear ended. Good luck.

Hurst

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ken Macfarlane

06-23-2005 07:01:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Today's pickups in reply to Hurst, 06-22-2005 20:17:09  
Here's my beef, in Canadian $:

1988 - Chevy Cavalier base model was 9800$.
1988 - Chevy 1500 W/T 2wd base model 11,000$.

2005 - Chevy Cavalier base model is about 16,000$
2005 - Chevy 1500 W/T 2wd base model list 24,995$


Do some math there and you'll see why I'm pissed. Both have gone from no air bags, no abs, simple fuel injection to all the new fancy expected stuff. The car did it for less than double, the truck has more than doubled.

I read a good article a couple of years ago on Chysler. At the time a Grand Cherokee cost them less than 500$ more to make than the Neon. They profit margin on the neon was less than 500$ for the Corperation. The margin on the Grand would have been 8000$ or something like that. It was all about demand in the market.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy