Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

compacts

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
dmc

05-14-2005 02:07:31




Report to Moderator

I am looking to buy a compact tractor with loader
and finish mower,(i look at the landpride finishmower would this be a good mower0 and boxblade. which compact do you think is the best deal for the money. Also which brand has the better durabilty and parts avalibilty now and in the future. i have look at the New Holland , Farmtac, Yanmar and
Mahindra. A bit new to this. just bought 10 acres in E. Texas so i need more than just a xmark mower can do. All your comments will be very helpful thanks from E.Texas

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Mac

05-15-2005 16:05:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
I've come to the conclusion that this middle ground between compact and utility is a myth and doesn't exist. Anything light enough to mow your lawn ain't gonna do diddly in the dirt and would be miserably slow cutting 10a. Get a 50-60hp, over 5k lb utility and a subCUT for barn cleanout and lawn.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Leroy

05-15-2005 05:32:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
Our area, Ohio, Kuboto most popular then J D, Cub Cadet, NH and forget the rest, no dealers



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fawteen

05-15-2005 03:12:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
I'm not going to get into a color war. I'll just mention a few points learned from my experience.

1. Someone said new JD's are all plastic and electronics. I agree. I have a 1988 JD CUT, and it's been absolutely dead reliable. I've driven a couple newer (4XXX) JD's and they look and feel MUCH cheaper, and have way too much stuff to go wrong.

2. Older JD CUT's were mostly all Yanmars with JD paint and bodywork. Therefor, if I were in the market again, I'd have to look REAL hard at Yanmars. Much as I like my Deere, you can't argue with the saying "Nothing costs like a Deere."

3. Someone said "You can do little jobs with big tractors but not...etc." True, as far as it goes, but big tractors are harder to trailer, harder to get into tight spaces and more likely to tear up the turf when turning or when things are soft.

4. My JD is a 1988 750, 18 HP diesel. In 17 years I've put one battery and one rockshaft seal kit in it. Period. I've run a 5 foot bushhog through 2" alders, dug trenches, ditches and foundation holes with a Woods 650 backhoe, graded drives, moved snow, tilled gardens and done a host of other tasks. Not as fast as I might have with a 50 horse tractor, but still just as done. I've gotten several jobs the big boys couldn't do because they couldn't get at it without cutting down trees or tearing up a lawn.

My point: Bigger ain't always better, and neither is newer.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mark - IN.

05-15-2005 06:02:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to Fawteen, 05-15-2005 03:12:47  
Surprisingly enough, everything green aint always as expensive as one would think. Usually, not always.

Yesterday was up at the Deere guy's place pickin up some stuff, and asked what the deal was on that 4520 that'd been settin out there for a month or so. He asked me if I wanted a loader put on it, and I said no, had loaders already. Then he flipped some pages and said I could have it for either $24K or $27K. I about died. They were nice in their heyday (hay day), but this thing was about 70% on the fronts, 20% on the rears, and had been well used. Was still nice (has potential), but needs a lot of work. I told the guy I fugured was about a '70, and wasn't worth anywhere near that. He called the boss over whom cleared it up. The sales guy was talking some new or newer compact out on the lot somewhere, and I was talking about that sun faded, well worked field beef settin up by the road. The boss said not putting anymore money into it, $5K. That surprised me. They closed while I was out looking it over, but we'll be talkin again.

There are some surprises out there. Not often, but some.

Mark

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

05-14-2005 18:53:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
Check out www. t r a c t o r b y n e t .com - they discuss all compact tractors. Sorry for the spaces....

NH, Case, Kubota, & JD are all good, pick whichever fits your rear & your wallet, find a good dealer. Can't go wrong.

Cheaper is something from India or Korea, good value for the $$$. Little harder finding a dealer or parts, but good base machine.

The 'off' brands from Japan are also pretty good value, harder to find parts, but low price, fairly well built. Yanmar, Kubota grey-market machines, etc.

Don't buy anything from China, poorly cast, poor hydraulics & controls, poor everything, no one will buy it from you for more than scrap price. Parts can be a nightmare. These things are sold from every mail-order, low-budget supplier, off the back of traveling semis, etc. under every name brand under the sun. Total junk.

--->Paul

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
KENT

05-14-2005 06:50:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
STAY CLEAR OF NEW JOHN DEERES--THEY ARE ALL PLASTIC AND ELECTRONIC--NOT BUILT FOR THE LONG HAUL--I HAD A NEW ONE & TRADED IT FOR A KUBOTA--KUBOTA IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE BEST MADE & MOST RELIABLE TRACTORS ON THE MARKET---THEY HAVE DEALERS ALL OVER EAST TEXAS



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

05-15-2005 13:21:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to KENT, 05-14-2005 06:50:50  
That bit of wisdon from somebody that types his entire message in caps. Plastic don't rust, steel does. I'll take an electrical control system over a mechanical and most hydraulic systems, anytime.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fawteen

05-15-2005 16:11:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to buickanddeere, 05-15-2005 13:21:01  
A basic concept of good design is KISS. The fewer moving parts involved the better. If you need a clutch, you use a pedal, a link and a yoke. Why complicate it with a master cylinder, a slave cylinder, more seals, more hoses, more things to wear out and leak if you don't have to?

I've been involved in maintenance in general and electronics in particular all my working life, going on 35 years now, and it has been consistently proven to me that unnecessary complexity ALWAYS leads to increased breakdowns.

Electronically controlled HST's and electronically controlled throttles just don't make any sense to me. It ain't required to get the job done, so why complicate things? I don't think it contributes enough to fuel efficiency at the CUT level to be worth the investment and the hassle.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
KENT

05-15-2005 14:41:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to buickanddeere, 05-15-2005 13:21:01  
YES, MR B & D, I USE CAPS OR SMALL LETTERS AS I TYPE BY HUNT & PECK AND SINCE YOU DON'T LIKE CAPS, HERE GOES---we all know that you bleed green and anything john deere puts on the market is great by you---i bought a new jd 4610 and kept it for a year and a half---i really liked the tractor very well, but i had electronic problens and plastic breakage--also, wires hanging all over that caught up in brush--this was not due to abuse---you say metal fenders will rust, plastic won't---i assure you that if you left both outside in the hot texas sun and 30 to 40 inches of rain a year, the metal would last a whole lot longer than the plastic---how many 40 to 50 year old tractors are running around without rusted out fenders?---lots of them in my part of the country--
AS I SAY, THE PLASTIC AND ELECTRONIC TRACTORS ARE NOT BUILT FOR THE LONG HAUL !!!!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Robert in W. Mi.

05-15-2005 14:28:41




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to buickanddeere, 05-15-2005 13:21:01  
Well, the plastic doesn't rust, but the sun sure eats it up in time!

Also, i don't like the electric "everything" either. In time i bet you it will NOT proove as reliable as the manual systems.

I kinda like it when "i move this, and i see that move" At least i don't have to have an electrical degree to figure it all out!!

Robert



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

05-15-2005 18:06:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to Robert in W. Mi., 05-15-2005 14:28:41  
I may bleed green but I think any 1010 diesel, 2010 diesel and the 1st two years of gas 2010 production were trouble. The new utility tractors in the 5000/5010/5020 series should have got hundreds of JD managers fired. Or demoted to scrubbing toilets and floors. As for a simple clutch, yes a simple pedal,rod and yoke is superior. However for control and feedback from remote locations on a machine. Or for control of hydraulic implement level control, fuel injection, transmission shifting or GPS interface. The electronics will work longer than a mechanical system with open or moving parts. Electrical and electronic control will perform tasks that no mechanical system can. A little training and electrical/electronics is dead simple to trouble shoot with just a multimeter. At work we can't wait to yank out a mechanical or hydraulic system to replace it with electric's. Texas heat and sun? Try sun and temperature fluctuations from too hot to hold your hand on in summer. To brittleness caused by being so cold, a whack on cast iron breaks cast like glass. Yet the quality plastic blends work fine.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Robert in W. Mi.

05-16-2005 14:28:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to buickanddeere, 05-15-2005 18:06:02  
The sun here in Mi. eats up plastic, i have all kinds of examples of it here on my farm.

I lived in Alaska for a long time, i was in Northway when it was -62F, and i didn't see any cast iron breaking???? Over the years there i heard all kinds of stories, yet in 25 years of liveing there i never experenced even one of them!!

The reason plastic is used so much today is because it's CHEAP to use, just injection mould the part, and sent it to the mfg..

Robert

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Blackhole49

05-14-2005 06:48:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
I have had 2 Kubotas. The only down side to the tractor was it used the three point to lift everything. Not bad for a three point mower, but a pain for a belly mower (much handier than a three point) and a front snow blower. We run the landprides comercially at work and they are excellent.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

05-14-2005 06:45:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
I was supprised when shopping for a compact/overgrown garden tractor. That a real tractor such as the utility JD 5105 cost the same as a compact. Turf tires and deck mowers fit right on. You will always be glad to have a loader large enough to lift more than a wheel barrow full of dirt. They still park in the same space in an automotive garage. And you avoid the feeling of being a boy trying to do a man sized job.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Galen

05-14-2005 07:03:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to buickanddeere, 05-14-2005 06:45:09  
Tried to explain this to BIL, but he's never been around ANY tractor, so went for one of the imports. The one he's getting is a 30HP Kioti. I showed him a nice Ford 4000 with mower, FEL, blade and some others for about $11,000 less, but he just had to have the yuppie. Thinks he's gonna do dirt work for people with it (and expects it to last him 30 years).



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
hay

05-14-2005 06:17:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
"The sweetness of cheap prices is forgotton much sooner than the bitterness of poor quality". Not trying to start a color war here, but JD compacts (made by yanmar) are very reliable tractors, at least mine is. i have over 1100 hrs. on a 1995 JD 870 and almost no repairs beyond regular maintanice. JD dealers here in se texas regulary have package deal sales and some are really good buys. i bought JD because of 1) name brand, 2) price, 3) dealer support. i am very happy with my choice. the little JD 870 can do an amazing amount of work for it"s size. the "70" series tractor have been re[laced with the "4000" series now, but they have even stronger hydraulics and more hp for comparable size. still, it"s your call, but JD is a very good deal.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Galen

05-14-2005 06:49:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to hay, 05-14-2005 06:17:22  
"The sweetness of cheap prices is forgotton much sooner than the bitterness of poor quality".

Yeah, I agree, JD can build some good stuff, and we all have our favorites, but my brother told me something similar to this 5 years ago when I bought a Farmall 460 and an 8N and he bought a new "Big 3" tractor. His is currently sitting , waiting for the cash to repair it (out of warranty), while mine are still chugging along. Cheap price doesn't always mean cheap quality, just as high price doesn't always mean high quality. Not picking on ya, just relating a story.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Galen

05-14-2005 05:44:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
BIL is in process of buying a Kioti - wasn't happy when I asked him "what's it want to be when it grows up?". Nothing wrong with a compact for smaller acreage, but they will get very pricey, very quick - it's not cheap HP. Landpride makes good mowers. I'm too durned tall for a compact, so won't own one (more room on my 8N). Of all the ones BIL looked at (NH, Kubota, Century, Branson, McCormick, Yanmar, Farmtrac, Kioti, MF), I liked them in this order: NH,MF,Century,McCormick, Kioti,Kubota,Branson,FarmTrac,Yanmar (Just my opinion - don't want to start a war!). NH was clearly the winner, but also the most expensive(JD was ousted early due to price). Then you have to decide Gear or Hydrostat (HST) - The HST's out there just don't (to me) "feel" quite right. All of the ones he looked at were in the 30 HP range (looked at a few others, but he wanted small). There is a board for "Yuppie Tractors" -Tractorbynet (dot) com - they will answer any questions you have.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
evielboweviel

05-14-2005 04:36:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
Kubota, buy all you need a tone shot as a package should get better price. Kubota mowers are very good
Ron



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RustyFarmall

05-14-2005 04:25:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 02:07:31  
The landpride is a good choice. You might want to take a good look at the Kubota compact tractors also.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
mark

05-14-2005 09:47:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to RustyFarmall, 05-14-2005 04:25:08  
A man once said to me, "you can do small work with a big tractor, but you can't do big work with a small tractor."

Let that one soak in for minute or three. Then, after you go spend your money, that bit of wisdom will come back and haunt you if you err on the side of 'too small'.

I visit here most every day, don't claim to be an expert and have come to recognize the 'experts' from their comments on everything from weevils to widgets.

Allow me to say this; JD has been in business long before most of these companies were even a figment of some man's imagination. They are here for the long haul and will probably be around when we're all dead and gone. I'm not going to knock Kubota, they make a good machine.

I'm 47 years old and started with my backside planted in the seat of a 1946 Oliver RC 60, 40 years ago....yeah, either folks were stupid then or figured kids had more sense than now. Since that time, I've had several tractors and everytime I trade, I get a bigger one....that ought to tell you something, as my place isn't getting any bigger.

I mow my 2 acre yard with a finish mower, bushhog a few more acres and have a big truck garden. My latest tractor is a JD 5320 4 wd with a 541 loader. It isn't too big for mowing the yard.....you'd be surprised at how nimble it is. It handles an 8' bushhog and pulls 2 16" plows like they're not back there. The tractor is heavy enough that the nose stays where it belongs instead of looking for the stars when bushhogging on a hill side and loader will move most anything you put in it.

You don't have to go buy a new outfit, but while you're buying, get enough machine and buy something that is built to last and has a good dealer behind it.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Galen

05-14-2005 16:17:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to mark, 05-14-2005 09:47:46  
EXACTLY, Mark! I was trying to get the same sentiment across, but you said it best. My brother couldn't understand why I would buy "that cheap old c_ap!" I don't need too high of HP, and do believe there is a limit (50-60 HP would be most I'd go) to what you need. I am not a JD fan (they build good stuff though), but a lot of the old iron needs looked at - like you said, you don't NEED new. Save some of your cash and look at the older HP. It will still be here in 30 years.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
mark

05-14-2005 18:09:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to Galen, 05-14-2005 16:17:19  
Galen,

A lot of folks don't think outside the box they make for themselves.....until they're knee deep in hock with a machine that fails to meet their expectations. They then either trade up, or try to make do.

I've always owned used tractors until this last one, nothing wrong with a used machine as long as somebody hasn't gutted it before you buy it. Most tractors used in real farm operations get the crapola ran out of them and when they decide to let them go, they're generally used up. Why buy something to work on? I want something to work 'with'.

I have neighbors who run honest to god farms and they are hard on tractors. They are businessmen in overalls and a tractor is no different to them than a copier to a suit and tie guy. When the copier or tractor lays down....out it goes and a new(er) one replaces it. Moral is: avoid these machines unless you just enjoy working on machinery and spending lots of dollars ressurecting the dead. You just have to decide what you want and of course, can afford.

I couldn't afford a cab or a power reverser, so I had to satisfy myself with something less. It's a luxury to me to have a canopy and a synch-shuttle tranny. 4 WD is great, but this is the first time I ever had it on a tractor.....it isn't a 'must have'. My current tractor has something like 55 pto horses....not a big machine, but enough for most jobs. I have no use whatsoever for a 80 horse tractor but if I did, that's what I'd buy. Makes no difference what I paid for mine or what you'll pay for yours. However, try to just spend your money once and be done with it. Size does matter....hehe!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dmc

05-14-2005 10:57:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to mark, 05-14-2005 09:47:46  
thanks mark for your thoughts. my buying a trator and useing the word compact might get the wrong idea idea from some. Maybe i should have stated abit more info such as HP as you said too small
will haunt me forever. really looking at a tractor in the 35 to 40 HP range maybe a bit more well keep the thought and commets comeing as they are very helpful



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Robert in W. Mi.

05-14-2005 17:46:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to dmc, 05-14-2005 10:57:24  
In that hp You can buy a compact tractor or a real ag utility tractor. There's no doubt when used for HD service the ag utility will out last a compact.

Thing is, not everyone needs the strength of the ag tractor, so you need to decide what will work for you.

Robert



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ken Macfarlane

05-15-2005 18:17:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to Robert in W. Mi., 05-14-2005 17:46:22  
Have run utilities (IH584, Case IH 585) one an open 2wd the other cab,loader,4wd mostly the last several years.

We bought a Kubota L5030 wiht cab loader and hydrostatic. It is big for a compact at 50 hp and 6500 lbs with the loaded tires. For logging, it is so nibble and compact for zipping around the woods it is great.

The 4wd really helps getting us around the yard, frequently the 2wd utility can"t go anywhere due to having some rain or whatnot.

The loader valve is so much improved over the IH2250 it isn"t funny.

Lastly, the biggest make fun of point, the hydrostatic tranny, has been incredible. Yeah, it is 2500$ for a new drop in unit if it dies but the machine becomes an extension of you! We moved 80 yards of crushed rock the other weekend with it in a few hours, placing it all in trenches lined with filter fabric. Despite the sloped site you could put the rock with 1" of where you wanted with no roll back of the machine, and no knocking the sides in on the trenches. I couldn"t have done this with the utility tractor without a lot of trouble.

I hope to put it to use this summer on the square baler and haybine. I know of a gentleman in Michigan putting up 4 cuts a year off 80 acres on the same machine after using bigger utilitys. He pulls a 13 ft haybine, a 5x4 round baler and a square baler with kicker wagons.

My only complaint so far? The really short wheel base makes for a rough ride. Steers on a dime but rough ride.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Robert in W. Mi.

05-16-2005 14:40:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to Ken Macfarlane, 05-15-2005 18:17:14  
I'm glad you like your Kubota tractor, i like mine too.

The L series is not an farm tractor, and if used for one like baleing small squares and it breaks, Kubota will NOT cover it under warr..

I've seen (2) "L" series get the PTO knocked out when baleing, and Kubota would NOT cover either one. Kubota says that's why they make the "M" series, for farm work.

Robert



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve_in_WV

05-24-2005 07:59:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: compacts in reply to Robert in W. Mi., 05-16-2005 14:40:46  
Robert,
When I read your comments about the L-series tractor from Kubota I got upset as I purchased an L-3130 a while back in preparation of buying a small farm down the road. The dealer told me the series was for small farms and the Kubota website also states this (the farm I purchased has a hay bottom of about 30 acres that I will be using to produce hay for the stock we will be carrying over the winter with some left over to sell). I went back to the dealer to question his tractor recommendation to me and relate your experience to him. He said that without details he could not comment on why the warranty did not cover the PTO failure. He went on to say that if a baler that had a large PTO horsepower requirement was mismatched to the tractor, then it might not be covered due to equipment "abuse" (that is what I took his explanation to mean). Could you give me more details on the PTO failures that you mentioned please? The dealer said that if I needed to upgrade he would take care of me (I hope that means that I will be given good value for my tractor as I only have about 15 hrs on it.) Any information would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Steve

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy