Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush hogg

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Joe Bard

09-20-2004 20:02:26




Report to Moderator

I am looking to buy an older tractor to run a brush hog and pull a landscape rake. Need something with a loader. Gas or diesel does not really matter. Would like it to have a two stage clutch for the pto - I will be doing alot of backing up. A posi lock would also be nice (not sure what the correct name is) and power steering would be a bonus too. I am not going to work it too hard - just have 59 acres that need to be kept up. Just looking for realiable and something I can get parts for. Any tips or thought would be great!!!

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Mitchissippi

09-21-2004 09:24:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
I help a cousin and an uncle take care of a combined 300 or so acres. We have an 830 (3 cylinder) diesel and a 1066. We use the 830 on the cat 1 equipment and have cat 2 and 3 equipment for the 1066. We are generally John Deere people. We bought the 1066 for the same price as the 830 and it has served us very well. The bigger equipment costs more, but you can do so much more in so much less time, that I don't won't to be without the bigger tractor. If I could only keep one - I'd keep the bigger one. I can work up the gardens with the big tractor if I have to. I bought a 5 yard dirt pan to make improvements on the place and it has paid for itself many times doing custom work for neighbors and in what I would've paid some one else to do the job for me.

I'm not knocking the smaller tractors, just don't think that just because you aren't farming for a living, the smaller is the only way to go. If I were farming for a living, I might figure to the penny what it costs to operate both of ours and make some changes. I do believe that in my situation, the bigger tractor has been more capable of doing about any chore we have. I do like to use the small (lighter) tractor for any work in the yard.

Indydirtfarmer has a good point about the 60 - 80 hp range. That range, I think would serve me well - but the 125 horse 1066 was cheaper at the time we purchased it.

Lot to think about - listen to all opinions - then BUY A TRACTOR - and be careful! Taking care of a place can be very enjoyable - if you have the tools to suite the job.

Mitch

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe Bard

09-21-2004 06:17:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
Need to clarify.. it 59 acres, some of it wooded. It has alot of trails around the property that are growing in. Just mostly trying to keep the brush down by mowing one-two times a year.

There are alot of ford 3000, 3400, 4000, 5000 among others around. Also MF and JD, although not quite as common.

What is the difference between live pto and independent?

Thanks for all the input so far!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMS/MN

09-21-2004 11:32:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-21-2004 06:17:03  
A generic term for posi-lock is 'differential lock'. Not all live pto systems use a two-stage clutch. AC used a hand clutch to provide live pto and hydraulic power on certain models since 1948! An independent pto is one that operates totally independent of another clutch- in other words, if the tractor engine is running- you can engage or disengage the pto no matter what else is going on.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 07:32:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-21-2004 06:17:03  
Those Fords you mention are (Can be) good tractors. I've owned a 3000 gas (1974) and a 5000 diesel (1973) Both wer great tractors. They can be worn out at that age though. Look at them closely. If you're like me, you don't want a resoration project for a working tractor. Massey Ferguson has made some of the best "small" utility tractors over the years. Just don't go TOO SMALL. Most of the smaller utility tractors have marginal hydraulics for heavy loader work. You also mentioned a Ford 3400 That was (is) an industrial tractor. Since you won't be doing "row crop farming" that would serve your purpose quite well. Most industrial tractors have good, heavy hydraulics, since they are designed for loader work. Best bet..... look for a tractor you like, then post on here with specific model, and we'll all be glad to tell you the good vs. bad points of each. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe Bard

09-22-2004 17:00:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 07:32:19  
Ok - thanks for all the replies. It is a great help! I have been looking for slightly higher hp machines as suggested, but most are newer (1980's). I did find a '80 340b (kinda ugly) and a ford 545. Any comments on these?

Thanks again!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 07:15:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-21-2004 06:17:03  
Old tractors had Power take-offs that fed through the transmission. The same clutch that fed the transmission would disengage engine power from the PTO (and the hydraulics in most cases) Anything connected to the PTO that had a "flywheel effect" such as a bush hog, would continue to turn the transmission, even with the clutch disengaged, pushing the tractor along. The over-riding "clutch" was the only cure for that. Live power was developed to remedy the situation. The clutch is a two-stage affair. Push it halfway down, and you disengage the transmission. Push it the rest of the way, and you disengage the PTO. Live Hydraulics USUALLY ran continuously, with no effects from the clutch. Independent PTO's have no "connection" from the drive clutch. They USUALLY have their own (USUALLY HYDRAULICLY CONTROLLED) "clutch" to engage or dis-engage it. I hope that explains it enough. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
TheRealRon

09-21-2004 07:08:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-21-2004 06:17:03  
A live PTO is driven off the flywheel (not the transmission). An independent PTO has it's own clutch, independent of the engine clutch (usually a hand lever). You need a live, independent PTO for a rotary cutter. Makes for a safe and enjoyable experience.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John (MO)

09-21-2004 06:16:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
You need an AC 170. Unless you"ve just got more money than you know what to do with, don"t invest it in a JD. You"ll find you can buy an AC 170 and the equipment you need for less than just the tractor if you go with JD. Don"t get me wrong most JD"s are good tractors, they are just way over priced compaired to the quality and features on other brand tractors.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 07:21:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to John (MO), 09-21-2004 06:16:18  
And we're ALL wrong, and you're right? John Deere has more than 50% of market share in ag tractors. That's against ALL other brands. There is a GREAT reason why MOST full-time farmers choose GREEN and YELLOW, and a similar reason why MOST other brands have sold off or gone out of business.
The quality is there, the "sound investment" is there. They aren't one bit OVER-RATED.....John



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jeff Oliver

09-21-2004 20:28:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 07:21:29  
I do own and farm with Deeres and I have to say that they are great machines. However if I remember my reading right Massey Ferguson is the largest selling tractor Worldwide. Deeres pretty much take it here in the US but since you stated in the world I think the MF beats it.

As for parts, JD are more than a little % higher than others, I have to buy them too. So far on my 1964 Oliver 1800 LPG I have not found any parts I can't get from the dealer and I am sure that if there are any an aftermarket manufacturer does make them.

Now all of that said, thie person might not have the money to invest in a deere either as they generally are higher than some of the other brands. He stated that he is looking at something to use maybe 3 times a year or so then most any brand would work as he is no making a living with it.

I like my Olivers and my Deeres however if one of the things your looking at is alot of backing up then I would say go with a Deere or an IH with the shift on the side. They're alot easier to mess with the gears alot thant the Oliver, A-C's etc.

If you want to go back to something like a Super 88 Oliver or 880 or something in that line then it is alot easier as they had the gearshift in a better place. The older D series A'C's are good tractors and like a Deere you can still get prety much anything you want for them. Fords are good ones also and there is practiacally nothing you can't get for one of them. I would suggest going to one that is solid blue or newer I think like a 4000 or so.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
TheRealRon

09-21-2004 10:14:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 07:21:29  
John,

I think he wants to buy an OLD tractor, not a new one. Up here, you can't give an old JD away, they usually have to take them out of state to sell them. Replacement/repair parts are hideously overpriced.

Here our old tractors on working farms are mostly Olivers, especially the 1550 through 1850 models. A few "hobby farmers" use old Fords, 8N and 9N.

Ron



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 11:11:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to TheRealRon, 09-21-2004 10:14:48  
By the way, where do you live? There must be a real problem in your area, as far as Deere parts go. They're only a few % higher than anyone elses parts, and with the added assurance of them being available when you need them, it's worth a few cents more. How would you know first-hand about Deere parts, since there aren't any in your world? I guess now I know where all the Olivers went... Sure aren't ANY farming full-time here in the mid-west. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
TheRealRon

09-21-2004 11:45:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 11:11:26  
John,

You are way off base. I'm NOT going to get into a Oliver vs. JD thing with you or anyone else. That would be worse than religion and politics!

But I'll say these two things...

1) Even the most ardent JD fans I know will tell you that Oliver was by far the better tractor. Oliver the company made a lot of bad decisions otherwise we might be having an entirely different discussion.

2) A neighbor went to buy a replacement alternator from the JD dealer for his 5-6 year old JD tractor. He was told the price was $450! No one in their right mind would pay $450 for an alternator so he sold the tractor and bought an Oliver. That's how I learned ther story. In any event, Oliver was smart enough to use all electrical components made by Ford (Holley) and/or GM (Delco) on all their models. So an alternator for any Oliver tractor is $60 at NAPA. Same deal with starters, distributors, etc. All the parts you would expect to replace on an old tractor are cheap where Olivers are concerned. Better yet, they were basically bulletproof. This is why most of the farms here are still using 40 year old Olivers daily. There are almost no 40 year old JDs working on farms here. Even better, should you need any Oliver part, any AGCO dealer sells them. Mine is just minutes from house but there are AGCO dealers that sell the complete line over the 'Net.

If you're happy with your JD, that's great! It would be sad if we owned tractors we didn't enjoy!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 17:23:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to TheRealRon, 09-21-2004 11:45:13  
Obviously you have a severe drinking and/ or drug problem...Where in the world did you ever come up with the STUPID idea that Oliver was a better tractor than DEERE"s They made a few "good" tractors, but no where near in the same class as the 4020, or the 4440, or the ect, ect, ect. I use my tractors to farm with... Not just to push snow off of the driveway like you do. I need a REAL tractor for REAL work. Not some outdated, underpowered, antique. I"d suggest you try to get a clue before you go raving about something that"s disappearing into history like Your OILallover. AGCO is trying hard to compete on a world market. They still handle parts for the short term, for all their "collectors items" that their ancestors sold. Someday, you"ll get enough of a clue about tractor to go buy a real one. Untill then, good luck with your relic. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

09-21-2004 11:25:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 11:11:26  
John,

Those Olivereries are kinda hard to see. Ya has to look way down underneath those old loaders. :>)

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 18:18:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Allan in NE, 09-21-2004 11:25:05  
The comment about no 40 year old Deeres still working is absolutely absurd. Maybe in Rons imaginary world there might not be any, but there's still LOTS of 40, 50, 60, 70, ect, year old Deeres still working everywhere. I know of a few Olivers still pulling manure spreaders, or hay wagons, but you won't see too many actually doing heavy field work, because....They quit building them LONG before they ever got big enough to do todays kind of farming. Small "hobby farms" can still use them, as well as a few small struggling production farms, but for the most part, they just went away with the modern era of farming. When Agco started claiming names for their "generic tractors with names from the past" they had the sence to skip right over the Oliver name. I'm real sorry to see Ron making up stories as he goes along, but that's what's happening. You won't find any Deere owners anywhere that will tell you that Oliver made a better tractor than Deere....Completely rediculous...
I'm glad he found a tractor he likes. His Oliver is probably enough to move snow off of a driveway. Like I said, I need more than a lawn tractor for what I do. The fantasy story about the alternator on a Deere being 10 times the price of a COMPARABLE Oliver is NUTS. I'm sure the alternator in question is 10 times less output than the one he's talking about. I wasn't born yesterday. I've been working with ALL BRANDS of tractors for my entire life. He's not fooling me one bit. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 10:34:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to TheRealRon, 09-21-2004 10:14:48  
And by the way, If you can't give away any John Deeres around there, truck 'em down to the other 49-1/2 states. They're worth their weight in gold everywhere else. John



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 10:32:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to TheRealRon, 09-21-2004 10:14:48  
He mentioned 3-4-5000 series Fords. Those ore "older" but not "old" in my book. I'm not just recommending Deere's to the original question, but I'm downright convinced that when you're going to use one HARD every day, a Deere is as good, if not better of a choice than ANY tractor going. For what the begining post is about, most any brand, depending on condition, is workable. When you're dealing with used, it's the individual tractors condition, not the corperate history that makes the difference. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John (MO)

09-21-2004 08:03:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 07:21:29  
Over-rated? Maybe not. Over-priced? In my book, without a question! Some may choose to pay the price for the John Deere name, that's fine, it's their money they are spending. I however can get the same features and quality in several other makes of used tractors and keep a lot of extra money in my pocket. When I sell I'm going to get the same % of return on investment as the guy who bought JD (depending on condition of course). This is true for working tractors and equipment, those that are strictly in the collectors market follow their own rule, or lack there of as the case may be. It has long been know in the market place that not necessarly the best built product is the one that prospers or survives, there are many many other factors that come into play. Thus many pay hundreds of dollars for gym shoes that have a couple of dollars worth of canvas and rubber in them and are made for a few pennys of labor in some far off country. Or stock in some coumpany that doesn't produce anything can be worth a few cents one week, hundreds a few weeks later, and less than nothing a few months after that. Everone is free to spend their money as they see fit, that's the American way. I think a lot of people spend theirs poorly. I'll invest in land rather than overpriced tractor. 1150% increase in 5 years locally is better than you'll get out of the best 4020.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 08:37:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to John (MO), 09-21-2004 08:03:08  
I'm not buying a tractor as an invesment property. I'm buying a working piece of equipment, that is a major purchase, of which needs to be a sound investment of my hard earned dollar. Therefore, I want the best piece of equipment I can get my hands on. When you compare features, you need to compare apples to apples. Sure a 1970 AC tractor is just about as good as a 1960 Deere. But in 1960, those AC's weren't in the same league. Same today....
Then you compare dealer support. You can go to ANY Deere dealership, and get parts for just about anything they've built in the last 50 years. I can't even tell you where the nearest AGCO (NOT AC) dealer is near me. They don't have the parts network to maintain their product.
A great deal of the "modern features" on ALL brands of farm equipment originated with Deere. They have been the prooven leader in product developement, since the days of the first steel plow.
You compare your investment in land vs. a 4020....Try comparing the value of a 4020 against a D-19....Try FINDING a decent D-19.....
And I am, in this case referring to tractors that are still working for a living. Not "collectors tractors" which is about the only place I ever see orange tractors anymore. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John (MO)

09-21-2004 10:27:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 08:37:55  
Funny you should mention the under rated and under valued D-19. I bought my most recient one last spring at auction for $1,875. I put new govenor parts in it, a carb kit and a three point conversion. I've now got $2,395. invested in it. Now I see them advertized all the time for $4,500. but I bought the 3rd on I saw sell at auction last year and not one of them brought $2,000., so I have no expectation of getting $4,500. out of mine should I deside to sell it. I do however have a 70 hp tractor for less than $35. per horse power. Can you buy a John Deere for $35. per horse power? Heck my local JD dealer wants $2,000. for a 10 year old 16 hp riding mower. And I'm not saying his 10 year old 16 hp mower isn't a good mower. A John Deere just isn't someplace I want to tie up extra money. Of course I really hate to be too vocal about the tremendous value that a D-19 can be or a lot of other people will catch on and they won't be that value anymore. That is what has happened to John Deere, they have caught on in the mind of every person who ever wanted to set in a tractor seat and the price currently supported at an artificially high level. As long as that trend continues, JD investors don't have anything to worry about. It's the same thing with the little 8N Fords. They are overvalued and overpriced because they look so cute to people who don't really understand what it is they are buying. People who are looking for the best tool for the job and the best value for that tool can usually do better than John Deere. Now if my farming opperation was such that I was best served by buying new equipment and trading it in every 2 or 3 years, I suspect I would have an entirely different idea. In a case like that I think I would be very well served by John Deere equipment. That is just not the field I farm in, and I don't think it's the field a whole lot of people farm in.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 10:48:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to John (MO), 09-21-2004 10:27:16  
I farm with a 34 year old, a 31 year old, a28 year old, and a 21 year old Deere. Nothing NEW here. The "value" of an AC D-19 around here, (other than the occational collector) is about $1200 in fair to average condition. (as compared to 8N's selling at near $4000) When MOSt of us buy a tractor to farm with, you look at more than just the tractor itself. NONE of 'em will go through life without a part or two. That is part of the total package. AC parts are "collectors items" too. With the pathetic dealer support they offer, you are left scrounging for parts off of junk-yard parts tractors to keep one running. John Deere took over the lead in market share 43 years ago. It had nothing to do with "cute". It was, and still is about having the best tractor on the market. AC dropped off the map, except for the name that AGCO tries to hang on to, in the late 70's. I haven't seen a NEW AC in anyones fields around here since the 70's. Once again we're back to the fact that John Deere has outsold EVERYONE for 43 years. MOST of those tractors, and the ones built before then are still in high demand. You are one of a very small minority that choose to continue farming with a relic from a bygone era. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John (MO)

09-21-2004 11:36:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 10:48:20  
You suggested that I compare the value of a 4020 to a D-19 instead of to land. This is what I did. And you proved my point even further by saying average D-19's sell in your area for $1,200.! So I can buy at least 6 of them if not 8 or 9 for what a 4020 sells for, is that right? Talk about value, there you have it. If I ever wear out the D-19 I've got I'll head over your way for another one and save even more. Obviously you've had different experiences with parts than I have, support is still pretty good around here for the orange tractors. Even a 40 year old tractor where only about 6000 were made before the 190's came out. I think if parts become all that difficult to get those $1,200. dollar D-19's will go way up just as parts tractors. I'll plow, plant, mow or bale beside any 4020. If I should fall just a little short, I won't feel too bad, because of about $8,000. in my pocket. $8,000. would buy a lot of grass seed or lime or posts or wire or custom work on that guys 59 acres who was wondering what kind of tractor to get.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 12:26:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to John (MO), 09-21-2004 11:36:02  
The long and short of it is, when you're done adding all your aftermarket parts, and scavenged repair parts to that D-19. you still have a slow awkward old tractor that isn't very reliable, doesn't have ANY modern operator conveniences, and is a gas hog. The 4020 was (and still is for that matter) a very efficient, easy to operate, very reliable, modern tractor...40 years after it's introduction. No one else had ANYTHING as good as Deere's soundguard cab that came with the next generation of Deere tractors. The D-19 was intended for the average sized farm of the late 50's/ early 60's. (A couple hundred acres...tops) The 4020 was the steppingstone to BIG farms. I know a farmer that worked over 600 acres with ONE 4020, back in 1965. You can "get by" with some tractors, but I want better than "get by". Deere produced THOUSANDS of 4020's every year, for 8 years (Not to mention the 4010) They were the industry standard then. AC, Oliver, Case, IH, Ford, ect. all compared their tractors to the 4020. That tells me the whole story.... They were all trying to play catch up...They didn't make it. About the time Deere was being "Caught", the Next Generation tractors came along. With-in a few years, everyone else was looking for a buyer....for their failing companies. I'm sure you won't relent, but the proof is plain as day. Deere flat ran EVERYONE else out of the country. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John (MO)

09-21-2004 13:55:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 12:26:13  
You can believe that Deere RAN everyone else out of the country if you want, I have never seen where Deere made that claim.

The facts are that AC introduced the D-19 in 1961, the same year JD introduced the 4010. The 4010 diesel produced 72 drawbar hp from 388 cubic inches. The D-19 diesel produced 62 drawbar hp from 262 cubic inches. It was the first American made tractor to have a turbo charger as factory equipment. John Deere I believe caught up in 1964 with the introduction of the 4020 as far as turbocharging was concerned. In 1964 AC was producing the 190. During the production run of the D-19 and 4010, JD used 32% more cubic inches to produce 14% more horsepower. I'm not sure if they caught up in 1964 with the 4020 against the 190, I know the 4020 jumped to over 400 cubic inches and the 190 grew to 301 cubic inches. If someone is in the market to trade dollars for horsepower in the used tractor ring, you won't find more hp for less dollars than with a D-19. Any tractor over 40 years old may be well worn out, or well cared for and in great shape. So you've got to be careful there no matter what the color. Gosh I wish I could justify owning one of JD's first 4 cylinder tractors, just so I could try and see for myself what some people are so passionate about. But unless I win a few million dollars, spending all the extra that a JD costs just isn't practical to me. Still if that's where someone else wants to put their money, well it is their money and they earned the right to do with it as they like. Now if you want to talk GM vs. Ford, I can speak with more experience there. I did buy a Ford once.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 14:38:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to John (MO), 09-21-2004 13:55:04  
Well, let's see... What all did you get wrong THIS time?
First off, AC NEVER managed to surpass Deeres "in the field" performance with the D-19 or the 190. Horsepower claims didn't make reality any different. No one but second place is concerned with "horsepower per dollar on the used market" numbers. Deere never put turbo's on the 4020.... They didn't need to over-tax the 404 cu. in. motor. It made PLENTY of power, without overworking itself. It wasn't untill 1969, when the 4520 was introduced that Deere needed turbos to produce more power, and that was in answer to the IH 1206, NOT any pathetic attemts of AC. Myself, nor anyone else I know is "in the used tractor ring to buy more horsepower for the dollar". We buy and sell to make money. We buy and USE to make money. Those "excuse" numbers are meaningless. The Deere 388/404 engines weren't 4 bangers... They were six cylinders. I'm in farming to make money....plain and simple. Maybe those John Deeres just make us so much more than your AC's we just don't care how much they cost.....Or maybe they make us so much more we DO care how much they cost...That's why we buy'em... That's why I wouldn't take a field full of D-19's or 190XT's for ONE 4020. John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John (MO)

09-22-2004 08:32:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 14:38:20  
To quote you:

"I'm in farming to make money....plain and simple. Maybe those John Deeres just make us so much more than your AC's we just don't care how much they cost.....Or maybe they make us so much more we DO care how much they cost...That's why we buy'em..."

Maybe if more people used better judgement and did care about the value they got for there dollar, there would still be a lot more full time farmers around. Every year I see people spending money they can ill afford to spend and the next thing you know they've had to take a job off the farm to get by. That is a real shame because on the other hand I see a few farmers with good management skills growing and growing and growing. I've got a neighbor who bought 80 acres about 10 years ago. He worked hard and made wise purchases and investments and this spring he planted about 800 acres, I think he owns between 200 and 300 of that, the rest belongs to guys who tried but couldn't make a go of it themselves. He's farming with Case and Ford equipment from the 70's.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
postoakpankey

09-22-2004 05:45:31




Report to Moderator
 mower in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 14:38:20  
Need help in to idetify mowergear box. Can"t find any name on mower deck. Gear box has name warner Auburn In. 7 one half deck painted yellow . 3 point lift with single tail wheel. need clutch. thanks

bill



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

09-21-2004 10:33:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to John (MO), 09-21-2004 10:27:16  
:>)

If this darned land grab that I'm workin' on doesn't go thru pretty darned soon, I still won't be farmin' in any field. :>(

Hurmpgh! :>)

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
txblu

09-21-2004 05:42:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
Had a 42 hp International 464 built in '74 that had a shuttle shift, power steering, and independent (hand lever operated) PTO.

The shuttle shift is on the left side just as you drop your hand down between the seat and fender. There is a range lever and a fwd-rev. The fwd-rev lever is direct push pull so you can shuttle back and forth front and rear tractor movement. Since you want to back up a lot, I think you need to consider this.

The independent PTO lever is on the right side, same position and makes PTO in-out a snap, any time you want it, regardless of what else the tractor is doing..... .except running of course.

Mark

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JoeGA

07-14-2005 13:21:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to txblu, 09-21-2004 05:42:26  
I have a family owned Int. 574. The engage rod sounds like the shuttle shift you reference. It sets down along the left hand side. The handle has broken off and is simply a piece of steel rod that we would engage with our left foot. The problem I write about is that it keeps kicking out. I can't run it even with my foot against the rod for more than a minute before it kicks out/disengages the PTO.
Any ideas/suggestions? Also I just spent a few hundred bucks on a rebuilt clutch. It was a dual drive clutch - supposedly worked the PTO as well.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 05:32:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
I guess that I'll weigh in on this topic too. With the requirements you have, you're looking at a sizable investment. You're going to want something that will last. You need a tractor that will handle your needs for years to come. That USUALLY means sizing larger than first thought. I'd suggest, like everyone else so far, a minimum of 60 HP. That doesn't mean you have to LIMIT yourself to 60. In this case, bigger MIGHT mean better. BUT...Bigger will require bigger impliments. Then the cost starts to snowball.
That's why I recommend a 60 HP tractor. You can still use SOME catagory 1 impliments. That will keep the cost in line on things like scraper blades, box scrapers, ect. You would be able to accomodate a cat1 OR cat2 bush hog. (I ALWAYS suggest 3 point mounted mowers) Independent PTO is, in my opinion, better than Live PTO. I'd tend to favor that option. Diesel is WAY more economical to operate when you're talking 50+ HP. You will need good, modern hydraulics. I personally like R.O.P.S. with canopy, OR a cab. I wouldn't even consider owning a tractor without power steering. M.F.W.D. is a great option, especially on a loader tractor, but a costly one. If you have te choice, a "quick-attach loader" will make your tractor much handier. They do get in the way sometimes. I'm a John Deere fanatic! The are as good as it gets. They also make a great investment. Every Deere I own is worth more now, than the original purchase price.Parts are easy to get. They aren't cheap, but no brand is anymore.
As much as it pains me to say, an antique tractor isn't the way to go for your "primary tractor". Newer=dependable, for the most part. Parts will continue to be increasingly harder to find on the old stuff. Another factor would be the dealer support in your area. Look around to see what established dealerships you have nearby. I don't like "orphan tractors" for heavy use. You just never know when the parts are going to run out. Stay with a "current brand"
Lastly, you never know what's out there. A good deal just happens. If you go out shopping with one brand, or one model in mind, you will usually pay too much. Find one that you feel comfortable in/on. Not all tractors are designed for big guys. I climbed in a new Kubota last week. A neighbor bought it, and I just had to try it out. It was apparently made for operators around 5'-8", and 175lbs. My 6'-4", 285 frame just didn't work. My head was touching the cab roof, and I just barely fit through the door. Controls seemed like they were "under" me, instead of at my fingertips.
Good luck with your acreage. Happy tractoring! John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

09-21-2004 05:47:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Indydirtfarmer, 09-21-2004 05:32:43  
John,

I was just thinking. He might even need bigger than we are suggesting.

I'd hate to have to take care of 59 acres of mowing with a little 8 ft rotary cutter.....he might even need a bat-wing? That would demand what? 80+ horse?

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Indydirtfarmer

09-21-2004 05:59:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Allan in NE, 09-21-2004 05:47:15  
A lot depends on what he wants to do with the acreage. I take care of the mowing on over 1200 acres with a 7' mower....Because I crop all but a few acres. Then too, some people only mow weeds once or twice a year. My father took care of 788 acres with the biggest tractor being around 50 HP for years. I run a 15' batwing with 75 hp for cutting pastures. I've been in heavy weeds that suck the life out of a 130 HP tractor and the 15' mower. All depends on the application....John

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Princeton Bill

09-21-2004 04:48:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
Joe:

I am an Oliver guy through and through. But if I were you I would consider a John Deere 3020/4020. Get one with a wide front end and a loader made to fit them and you will enjoy taking care of your 59 acres. You also will have many good sources for parts if and when you need them. I am assuming you have not had a lot of experience "farming", but 59 acres can become a lot to take care of if you are doing it part time. A utility tractor such as Ford Jubliee, Oliver 55, etc. will probably do what you want , but a little bigger farm tractor will make your job a lot easier. No matter what you decide do get live PTO and live hyd.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

09-21-2004 04:16:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
Mornin' Joe,

At 59 acres, you are gonna need a medium sized unit (60 or 70 horse) and like the others have said, live PTO, live hydraulics, wide front with a fairly heavy loader and power steering.

I'm afraid that anything less is going to get very old very fast.

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
TheRealRon

09-21-2004 03:45:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
In addition to what "old" said, be sure to size the tractor to the rotary cutter. For example, if you have/buy a cutter that takes a minimum 60 hp tractor, then buy a tractor with at least that amount. If not, you risk frying the PTO clutch.

I'd also vote for the Oliver (I have one) and if you find one with "Hydraul-Shift" you will have 18F and 6R speeds. This is very handy for mowing.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
old

09-20-2004 21:01:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: Tips needed on buying older tractor for brush in reply to Joe Bard, 09-20-2004 20:02:26  
I'd go with the indepentant type of PTO like Olivers have and farmalls. The clutch for them is bilt in the the PTO lever and is very nice. Also if you want a loader power steering in a most. And a wide front end is also a plus. I have one for sale that would fit you bill other then no loader, take that back I have two.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy