Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

re; Wide front ends

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
sjringo

07-12-2007 16:27:42




Report to Moderator

Hello, I am new to this. I just bought a farmall H. Does anyone know if they made wide front ends for them and if so are they hard to find. I would like to put one on my H. Thanks




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Steven@ND

07-12-2007 20:16:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to sjringo, 07-12-2007 16:27:42  
Original IH type wide front:
third party image
third party image

Schwartz heavy-duty wide front (much better than IH in my opinion):
third party image
third party image

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Andy Motteberg

07-12-2007 20:06:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to sjringo, 07-12-2007 16:27:42  
Yes, IH made wide fronts. The IH wide front is rare and can cost a lot of money. The aftermarket ones are pretty common and are cheaper than the IH ones.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
David Goode

07-12-2007 19:32:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to sjringo, 07-12-2007 16:27:42  
As Others said IH did make them, but aftermarket conversions are much more common. I have a Super M with a wide front and Loader on it. The wide front is MUCH SAFER, have heard many stories about M's and H's tipping over and hurting or killing some one. I'd look around in local junk and salvage yards. Most wide fronts seem to go for $500. Good luck! -David Goode Coggon, IA

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nat 2

07-13-2007 05:10:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to David Goode, 07-12-2007 19:32:36  
If the wide front axle was solidly mounted, I'd agree with you. However, the front end is allowed to pivot on a pin in the center, so it is actually LESS stable than a narrow front.

By the time the front bolster of the tractor comes in contact with the axle tube, the tractor is already "over center" and it's too late. Both tires on the high side are already off the ground, and you either better be seat-belted in under a ROPS, or high-tailing it off the seat toward the nearest exit.

The real advantages to wide fronts are the ILLUSION that they're safer, but really, they ride much better because having the tires far apart reduces the likelihood that they both hit the same bump at the same time. Wide fronts are also easier to drive because you can see the tires and which way they are pointing without having to practically get off the tractor and look.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave 2N

07-13-2007 03:39:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to David Goode, 07-12-2007 19:32:36  
David-

I hogged my steepest field yesterday with my 48'JDA NF. This is the same tractor that has been used on this same land for lo these many years with nary a problem.. I grew up on a Farmall M NF on the hill farms of our region. Most of the farmers around here had NF's and I honestly can't remember hearing of a tipover with a NF. (Seems to be more problems with tractors trying to bring too much wagon weight down hills.) A NF is no more prone to tipping over than a WF EXCEPT if used unwisely with a loader. This NF tipover myth is simply a matter of using common sense.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

07-12-2007 20:49:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to David Goode, 07-12-2007 19:32:36  
Thats an old wives tale. They are no more apt to roll over than a wide front. The front will not sit on a hill as well, they tend to slide, but that is what brakes are for. I can mow anything with an M and tricycle front that anyone can mow with a wide front tractor. Have been doing it all my live. My neighbors who are afraid of the tricycles just watch me and shake their heads.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
David Goode

07-13-2007 09:49:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to georgeky, 07-12-2007 20:49:22  
Well I have had no experience on hills myself, but have had many friends who have had this problem and they say the wide front end helps. In my case it works better (more stable) for my loader than a narrow front end. So I,like your neighbors, shy away from tricycle fronts. Sorry for any false information. -David Goode Coggon, IA



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

07-13-2007 11:23:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to David Goode, 07-13-2007 09:49:29  
It is not a matter of false info, folks just tend to think of them this way. See Nat2's reply. The pivot points are the same for the same tractor regardless of which front end it has on it. I have an Allied 595 loader on My tricycle 666 and have no problems with it. That being said, my son did turn it over a couple years ago, but had it been a wide front it would have went too. The loader will cause any of them to flip if not used with care.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan In NE

07-13-2007 02:29:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to georgeky, 07-12-2007 20:49:22  
Comon now George,

You are being like me.....bull-headed. :>)

Click the link.

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

07-13-2007 07:41:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to Allan In NE, 07-13-2007 02:29:02  
Allan, nothing bullheaded about it. I have used these all my life and am more comfortable on them than a wide front. I have lots of seat time on both and have no problems on steep ground with either. The old tricycle is going to turn over myth started by folks who have never ran them. I do some custom mowing and when folks can't get anybody else to mow their hills I get the call and do it with an M or the 666 and a 15 foot BMB heavy duty mower. I never get any good flat jobs only hills. Most folks are afraid of them, but I am telling you there is very little difference in the tipping point. There is no substitute for safety and common sense on either.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jimmy King

07-12-2007 22:08:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to georgeky, 07-12-2007 20:49:22  
And if the tractor doesn"t have power steering the tricycles are a lot easier to drive!!!!! !!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

07-12-2007 22:12:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to Jimmy King, 07-12-2007 22:08:46  
Some folks seem not to consider that. It is true, they are a lot easier to steer. With some experience and good brakes they will turn quite easy.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
farmerweber in PA

07-12-2007 19:14:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to sjringo, 07-12-2007 16:27:42  
Grew up on 2 H's with narrow fronts and had an H a while back with a wide front.Now have a 350D with a narrow front.For planting corn,drilling oats,cultivating corn and raking hay the narrow front can't be beat.Wide front is definitly better disking the first couple trips around and plowing(not so much difference with a drag plow though).Grandad had a couple of hairy situations with a narrow front and a high lift.It would be really nice to have one of each!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

07-12-2007 16:49:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to sjringo, 07-12-2007 16:27:42  
Yes, IH and some aftermarket companies made them. Swartz may still make them. Search the Bates Corp. they use to sell them. They are not near as maneuravable as the tricycle front end. The tricycle is not near as easy to roll over as most folks think. I mow steep hills with them. They are on ebay quite often for 500 dollars and up.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
sjringo

07-12-2007 16:59:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to georgeky, 07-12-2007 16:49:25  
Thanks for the info. I have always used a wide front end tractor, so I guess that is what I am use to. I will give the narrow front a try.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

07-12-2007 17:14:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to sjringo, 07-12-2007 16:59:28  
For collector purposes the wide is a little more desirable, because of the rarity of them. For general use the tricycle beats it hands down. I have used both and there is no comparison to them. Espeacially in tight places. If you are not comfortable, widen your rear wheels out and give it a whirl.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan In NE

07-12-2007 17:29:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to georgeky, 07-12-2007 17:14:15  
Now George,

Ever try to thread one of those trikes down a 22" row crop, stradle an irrigation ditch or windrowed hay/grain for that matter?

I could never understand how they could even sell those trikes, but guess different parts of the country have different needs. :>)

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

07-12-2007 18:38:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to Allan In NE, 07-12-2007 17:29:34  
Allan: Given the numbers of narrow fronts sold up until 1960 at least, could it be all the folks that bought them, be wrong. I can understand the 22" row and irrigation ditch, but east of Chiago we didn't know what the hell those were. Infact in the 45" annual rainfall area where I came from that would have been drainage or water run off ditch. We planted potatoes in 42" rows just to get enough loose soil to keep the 50,000 lb/acre crop covered.

I even had a neighbor, while he was at the local sawmill getting some lumber, overheard the mill owner and others braging about their great crop of potatoes. Next day he phoned the mill, asked the mill owner if he had any construction grade 4"x12"x12' lumber as he had broke the 2x12 he bought the day before. "What were you using it for", the mill owner asked. "Oh" said my neighbor, "I was just rolling one of my potatoes onto the cart."

Now, the old gentleman was known to tell a few tall tales. I knew him personally, yet he claimed he fought in the war of 1812. Got hit in the stomach by a cannon ball that drove him 14 miles, knocked the wind out of him, or so he claimed. He once encountered a wind that blew the horse mower across the field. It had been left in gear with cutter bar down, and it mowed a swath as it went. He was a well travelled man and claimed in Nebraska he cooked in a work camp, took a barrel of flour to thicken the gravey. I expect that was in the days when you pulled those sugar beets by hand.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

07-12-2007 18:35:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to Allan In NE, 07-12-2007 17:29:34  
Allan, we don't use 22 inch rows here, but with the single front wheel it would be no problem. I have raked thousands of acres of hay with them. They were sold originally for cultivating row crops. I had a wide front on a Super C and it was a task to turn on the ends of fields with cultivator. I put the trike back on. I can mow circles around one with a wide front with cycle mower, as I can make the turns without backing up or doing a 360. We have limited space here and plant as close to the fence as we can get. We also don't have any irrigation ditches. I even pull the hay roller with one. My 666 is tricycle and will do anything it would with a wide on it. Can even work my mounted picker on it. I have nothing against the wide front on newer tractors with power steering, I even have 2 or 3, but like everything else there are advantages and disadvantages to both. I suppose it helps to be raised on them too.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan In NE

07-12-2007 17:10:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to sjringo, 07-12-2007 16:59:28  
Call Mike at www.steelwheelranch.com

He shiped my new Swartz in here for $813 including freight. They turn way shorter than the original wide fronts.

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John-Paul T

07-13-2007 14:02:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: re; Wide front ends in reply to Allan In NE, 07-12-2007 17:10:48  
Id make my own its a uber simple front axle with single pivot point.

I agree narrow or wide isnt going to make a huge diff with the way the pivot point is.

Tractors that come with wide factory dont allow so much movement in the front till it bottoms out. Liek our 2500 which came with a stock front end loader and back hoe. Its got two stabaliser bars too (like off road trucks).

You COULD make a better wide. One with power steering is a little more work but not much really. Ive welded my own small compatc tractor from scratch so I do know what it takes to make a front tube axle (not much at all LOL).

First you need to make stoppers, Id use solid steel plates, and set them to hit well before tip over angle. You can usually judge it well by eye. Thing to remember is your better off with one front wheel off ground then it pivoting front axle too far and tipping tractor. Which is what that wide front appears to do!

Or just buy one cheap used on ebay and add stopper plates to hit frame. 30 minute job tops-spark up the arc welder and cutter/grinder.

The other cheap way is one trip to a junk yard, and find a good 1/2 or 3/4 ton truck doner. Take one with solid front axle (tube style) and your half way there already. Anyone interested in this let me know. I even have DIY tractor plans bookmarked built entirely of truck parts. Working on a second now as I get time, using a 1966 FORD 4 ton dump truck. She shoudl pull good!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy