Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

Super C versus 140

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Sandfield Farme

12-21-2006 14:07:44




Report to Moderator

What are the differences in the super c and the 140? Is the horsepower about the same? Are they about the same size? One better than the other? Thanks




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Carp

12-22-2006 06:30:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Super C versus 140 in reply to Sandfield Farmer, 12-21-2006 14:07:44  
In my mind it depends on just how much cultivating you are doing and if that is the only thing you are doing. If you are doing a reasonable amount 5 acres or less I would use the 140 if that is all you plan to do with it. If you are doing more I would go with a C. If you are going to do more than just cultivate I would us and H. The cultivating capabilities of the C and H are about the same, but the H is a lot more tractor than a C but just as manuverable. I think the 140 is better cultivating tractor in most applications, but take it from someone who has cultivated 5 acre fields with an A, it takes a long time. I have switched to cultivating with an H and it is much quicker.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

12-22-2006 14:08:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: Super C versus 140 in reply to Carp, 12-22-2006 06:30:20  
Carp: You bring out a good point here. In all the years my dad and I farmed we never gave serious consideration to C, SC, 200, 230, etc. Just too much tractor for that little engine. The H, SH, 300 and 350 were just as manuverable, thus one may as well have engine enough to handle 36" or 38" tires. I've seen my brothers 230 get enough traction on tilled soil to kill the engine in low gear. A 130 or 140 will spin out in low gear before running out of power.

If your going to have a small engine you may as well have a small tractor. Any of the offsets are at least 2' shorter, very convenient in close quarters. Back in the 50s we ran a 7' semi-mount mower, would bolt up to either 130 or 300. The 130 would mow hay faster than 300. They are also very nice on a rake. Even when I was round baling hay in the 70s, 130 and SA still did the raking, now it took two rakes and those two tractors to keep up with the pace set by the round baler. You know something, one hell of a bunch of 8, 10 and 12 year old kids raked that hay and learned to do something useful with a tractor. Dad was the hay rake teacher, they had to do it right, he took the time to make sure they did. I've seen him taking the time too show some very young, never saw any diapers but it was close. Most of dad's students are now in their mid 40s, and some of the best drivers around. Those little tractors always had a place on a multi-tractor farm.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Keith-OR

12-21-2006 15:45:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: Super C versus 140 in reply to Sandfield Farmer, 12-21-2006 14:07:44  
Sandfield Farmer, to bad you are so far away, as there is a SC with cultivators close to me, here in Eastern,OR. I think It could be bought for less than a grand.

Keith & Shawn



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Sandfield Farmer

12-21-2006 14:32:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Super C versus 140 in reply to Sandfield Farmer, 12-21-2006 14:07:44  
Thanks for the information Tractorsam, I want to set the tractor up to cultivate and fertilize. It sounds like the Super C might be the better tractor because of weight and pulling cap. I have just started looking to buy and would like to have tractor ready by mid Feburary. I would like to find one with cultivators and sidedresser. Again thank you for your time.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
City-Boy McCoy

12-21-2006 16:05:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: Super C versus 140 in reply to Sandfield Farmer, 12-21-2006 14:32:34  
If you are cultivating and fertilizing, I don't see where weight and pulling power have anything to do with your decision, as neither is needed for those jobs - unless you are cultivating 10" deep (Haw-Haw!). You can see what you are cultivating and fertilizing better with the 140. You can do two rows at once with the SC - which only matters if you are working a large tract and hate spending time on a tractor.

Both are very fine machines. You can't go wrong either way.... unless you buy a worn out junker headache.

mike

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
tractorsam

12-21-2006 14:16:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Super C versus 140 in reply to Sandfield Farmer, 12-21-2006 14:07:44  
They're very similar tractor but at the same time quite different. I have a Super A and have just purchased a Super C. At the end of the day they should have (the 140 and the Super C) about the same power. The CID is the same (123) but I'm not sure that the engine in the Super C doesn't turn a bit faster for a couple more hp. Physically the Super C is both larger and heavier (apples to apples), also the Super C rear tires are quite a bit bigger (more traction?). They're both better than the other just depends what you want to do with them. Does the Super C have a wide front end? Fast hitch on either of them? What implements come with them? Hope this helps, tractorsam

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy