Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

SMTA Wide Front Question

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Brian Schmidt

01-17-2006 07:28:05




Report to Moderator

A guy was telling me that on the SMTA there was a serial number break in the wide front ends. Before a certian number they were the old style steering linkage in front. And after that, they went to the 450 style with the rods behind. My question is, is this true? And, if so, what was the number?

Thanks in advance!!




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
BIG JOHN

01-17-2006 17:36:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Brian Schmidt, 01-17-2006 07:28:05  
My 1954 SMTA SN# SM TA 81206S is equiped with the old style wide front end with tie rods in front of the axel.

For what it's worth.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

01-17-2006 12:45:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Brian Schmidt, 01-17-2006 07:28:05  
Brian: Dave and Bob are discussing just when the change over occured with that wide front. You've got to remember that every Farmall back in those days was shipped from the factory to dealers with narrow front end. I've seen rail car loads of Farmalls all on narrow front, with wide front axles bundled and strapped down to the deck of the rail car, and under the tractors. I know the dealers in my area ordered more wide fronts than they ever sold. Farmers in a given area would try a tractor on narrow, like it so well they declined the wide front.

My dad bought a new H in 1951, the dealer practically gave him a wide front. Dad used it a couple of summers pulling wagon and loose hayloader. Then he bought a baler and the wide front was never out of the shed. You couldn't keep those old wide fronts with tyrods out front lined up, thus they were very hard on tires.

I expect there are some of those old wide fronts at various locations that have never been on a tractor. I know one dealer that still had a supply of them when the 460-560 came out new, and he was still trying to flog them. Yes I have seen one on a 460.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Andy Martin

01-18-2006 05:54:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Hugh MacKay, 01-17-2006 12:45:19  
So now I don't feel so bad about my 400 with tie rods in front, except it has the old style clamp on wheels.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

01-18-2006 08:10:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Andy Martin, 01-18-2006 05:54:52  
Andy: No, you don't need to feel bad about that. I was at a show about 7 years ago, this was a new show at the time, and a lot of very amateur exhibitors showed up, along with one guy the had been professionally restoring tractors for 25 years. Most of his restoration work was farmed out. At that time the pro had 84 completely restored letter series Farmalls.

That day he brought a semi load of tractors, amoung them an H with wide front. The tyrods were behind the axle, the front wheels were disc and MF gray, spindles control arms and tyrods were MF 165. The rest was fabricated and I recognized the workmanship. I was the first to argue with him, he swore up and down that his front end was an IH option. It ended with him calling me nasty names. I walked away. During the day, several others chalanged him on his MF front end on an H. Near the end of the day an acquaintence of mine and his son stepped to the H and were quite vocal about this fabricated wide front. I happened to be 4 paces behind the owner and his brother. Finally the brother said to the owner, "I guess we should have brought the narrow front H, these hillbillies up here know their Farmalls."

You have a factory IH wide front and it does fit your 400.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tallperson

01-17-2006 10:06:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Brian Schmidt, 01-17-2006 07:28:05  
I have a '52 SM with a wide front and the tierods are infront of the axle...



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave Slater

01-17-2006 09:51:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Brian Schmidt, 01-17-2006 07:28:05  
Don't have a definite answer but do know the wide front for SM with tie rods in front was offered and installed on them.The TC 46 parts book
lists the tie rod in rear for tractors 60001 up
which would be the first SMTA. Both fronts are listed as attachments so dealers probably were selling new SM and SMTA tractors at same time.If a customer wanted a wide front installed the late one could end up on SM.This last is speculation on my part.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob M

01-17-2006 11:02:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Dave Slater, 01-17-2006 09:51:34  
Dave - FWIW my Super M TC-46 parts catalog lists only the "tie rods in back" adjustable WFE. The "tie rods in front" type does not appear.

However I suspect you are correct - that older "tie rods in front WFEs" were no doubt retrofitted to many SMs and SMTAs by dealers and owners.

Incidentally wife's dad's late '53 SM was received from new from the factory with the IHC tie rods in back WFE...

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave Slater

01-17-2006 14:10:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Bob M, 01-17-2006 11:02:55  
Bob,just curious what is date on your TC 46? Have 2 dated 4-20-54 and 10-59 and both show old
type wide front for row crop starting on page 416
and new type starting on page 422. Thanks



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob M

01-17-2006 17:59:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Dave Slater, 01-17-2006 14:10:11  
Dave - My rather beat-up TC-46 says "rev no. 3, 10-59" on the front. Somewhat curiously it"s missing pages 416 thru 420 (and probably others too...)



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob M

01-17-2006 07:59:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Brian Schmidt, 01-17-2006 07:28:05  
Well that"s only partially true...

The Super M factory WF has the tie rods behind the axle. So the break from the old style (tie rods in front) WF axle had to have been at the start of Super M production or before - ie. at least 2 years before the first SMTA was built.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Brian Schmidt

01-17-2006 08:34:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Bob M, 01-17-2006 07:59:52  
What is the difference in the IH SM WFE and the aftermarket Schwartz WFE?

Thanks!!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steven@AZ

01-17-2006 11:47:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Brian Schmidt, 01-17-2006 08:34:42  
The aftermarket Schwartz wide front is heavy duty compared to the factory IH.

There were 2 styles of hubs you could get with Schwartz - the 3 bolt wheels just like IH front end, or the 6 bolt hub similar to the 06 and up series.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John in Ne.

01-18-2006 13:15:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Steven@AZ, 01-17-2006 11:47:23  
My dad sold Schwartz wide fronts at his Imp. dealership in Phillips,Ne. Schartz did not make a three bolt cast wheel,you used the IHC one from your old frontend for it.If I remember right,Schartz built three different models.One to fit the 'H' ,One to fit the 'M',which was also called the HD one for the'H' and one for the 460/560 which was also called the HD model for the 'M',which was the only one that took a 5/6 bolt wheel. (IF my memory serves me correctly) John.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steven@AZ

01-18-2006 13:24:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to John in Ne., 01-18-2006 13:15:49  
The Schwartz wide front will fit from H through 450 for sure. I know this because I took my front end off a 450 and put it on my H. The only thing that is different is the steering arm, and the frame support brackets. The bolt pattern on the main bolster casting is the same.

third party image

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John in Ne.

01-18-2006 16:53:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Steven@AZ, 01-18-2006 13:24:29  
Like I said, My memory may be failing me a little on this.The front end on your 'H' probably would have never been ordered for an 'H'.Like you said,you took it from a 450.So it may be that an actual Schwartz WF for an 'H' may not be any heavier built than an IHC one.John.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steven@AZ

01-18-2006 17:34:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to John in Ne., 01-18-2006 16:53:02  
Very true. I dunno, I wasn't around then. All I know is this Schwartz was on a 450 and was put on it sometime in the 80's by the previous owner.

I tell ya one thing, it steers better than the original IH wide front with tie rods in front. And that was one that was in pristine condition!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Duanes

01-17-2006 14:12:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Steven@AZ, 01-17-2006 11:47:23  
Steve I beg to differ. The IH front was a lot better built than the Schwartz. Just compare them side by side like I have and run both.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steven@AZ

01-17-2006 14:57:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Duanes, 01-17-2006 14:12:14  
Exactly, compare them side by side and use both.

There is a reason that everyone with a front end loader in my area threw away the IH front end on their M thru 450 and put on a Schwartz wide front with the heavy duty hubs. Those 3 bolts and weak casting on the IH front did not hold up.

The main portion of the front end (cross tube, spindles, etc.) may have been equal, but the hubs would not hold up to any abuse.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

01-17-2006 18:01:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: SMTA Wide Front Question in reply to Steven@AZ, 01-17-2006 14:57:25  
Steven: I will tell you exactly same as a welder once told me about those IH 3 bolt cast wheels. I went to him with one of those cast wheels off my 300, broken. When I got there he was so drunk he couldn't get out of his chair. He said, "If you keep those IH wheels tight between rim and hub, there is no man alive tough enough to stay with the tractor long enough to break one". He further said, "Go away, come back tomorrow night and your wheel will be fixed". I did and he did. That was around 1961 and the wheel is still on the 300 and the 300 still has a loader on it. In fact now it has the 2000 loader that came off my 560.

By the way, when I returned for the wheel the next night, he was still so drunk he couldn't get out of the chair. He had a big lazy boy in his shop, for his lighter moments, I guess.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy