Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

706 VS. 656

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
K.W.

11-16-2004 02:57:30




Report to Moderator

Hi, What is the main difference between the 706 and 656 Diesel's ? Thanks for your input.




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
ed1

11-17-2004 16:54:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to K.W., 11-16-2004 02:57:30  
The 706 was a lemon but the 656 was a good tractor - 706's are allways cheeper that the 656. Not sure why as the 706 shared a number of engines with the 656 and simular transmission as the 806. 656 and 806 were really good tractors but the 706 - well is usally ended up parked at the end of the field rusting from something in the trans or a blown engine. Could they have gone cheep and downgraded the internal components in the 806's trans because the engine was less powerful. Can turning up the 656's engine reduced its reliability.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

11-16-2004 13:34:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to K.W., 11-16-2004 02:57:30  
KW: While everyone is busy arguing with Allan, who by the way is wrong, I will attempt to the best of my knowledge tell you the differences. Basic configuration is much the same. Rear chassis of 656 is basically a decendant of M, SM, 400, 450 and 560, with items like TA, IPTO, Hydrostatic steering, Draft Controlled 3 point hitch added. This was an evolution as some of these items or versions of them were on the earlier tractors.

The rear chassis of 706 is much heavier with dualrange 8 speed plus TA, two shaft PTO 540 and 1000. Same chassis as 7 through 14 in 06, 56 and 66 series.

The 656 is 96" wheelbase and 706 is 104" They use the same 282 diesel. A few 706 near end of production had the German engine. 656 PTO 540 = 1800 engine 706 PTO 540 = 2300 engine. The wide front is basically the same. Both tractors have Cat II - 3 point hitch usually with 1 or 2 auxillery valves. Some of both models were equiped with fast hitch.

I'm guessing here but shipping weights 656 = 6300 and 706 = 7200. TA on 656 will free wheel in low while the 706 will not. 656 has mechanical dry disc brakes, 706 has wet power disc brakes.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MN Scott

11-17-2004 06:30:41




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to Hugh MacKay, 11-16-2004 13:34:30  
One clarification Hugh. The 706 has hydraulic acuated dry disc brakes not wet disc brakes like newer tractors have.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

11-17-2004 08:12:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to MN Scott, 11-17-2004 06:30:41  
Scott: Thanks for that clarification, I knew out of all that I likely would have something wrong. My first heavy chassis tractor was 1066 and must admit i never did have brakes apart on that one. When exactly did they go wet?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
K.W.

11-16-2004 13:44:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to Hugh MacKay, 11-16-2004 13:34:30  
Thanks, That is what is was wondering about. I am looking to replace my dead 656 gasser. I have been looking for a 656/666 diesel but I can't afford to pay new price. I have looked at a 706 diesel that seem's to be a good tractor for $4000. I need to be ready for hay this spring. Thanks



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

11-16-2004 15:22:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to K.W., 11-16-2004 13:44:08  
KW: While I must admit I never owned a 706 with the 282 diesel, I did have a 656 and a 560. I got excellent service from both those engines. I always felt that running the 282 under 2000 rpm reaped big rewards in life of the engine. I felt then and still do today the heavy chassis of the 706 just taxed that engine a bit too much. I did have a 766 with the 360 engine out for a demo. I felt then and still do, the 360 engine was the answer for that chassis.

IH had a history for using an engine in more than one size tractor. In most cases the engine gained a much better reputation in the smaller tractor. A prime example of this was the C-113 and 123 used in SA, 100 and 130 and with more hp in SC, 200 and 230. The engine saw many more hours of trouble free service in the smaller tractor.

You see guys on this site discussing how much horse power they can get from a particular engine. No question you can get 250 hp from a 1066, but for how many hours? Every engine has a trade off between maximum power and hours of service.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Aces

11-16-2004 10:27:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to K.W., 11-16-2004 02:57:30  
The 1566 1568 1586 only one with planetary drive. Don't know about the 30 series that came in the 80's.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Novel Idea Guy

11-16-2004 06:18:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to K.W., 11-16-2004 02:57:30  
The main difference is that they're completely different tractors. Other than some of the bolts, and maybe the seat, the two tractors share virtually no parts, and the design of the drivetrains are completely different.

The 706 had a bull-gear final drive, not a planetary.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

11-16-2004 06:52:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to Novel Idea Guy, 11-16-2004 06:18:21  
NIG,

Yes, but don't the axles actually drive thru a set of 3 pinions out at the final drive axle housing?

Never been in one, but this was my understanding, anyway.

I was noticing a 'ticking' noise in my 966 while easing down the road at low throttle in road gear. Called the IH mech out from town, cost me $100.

He listened to it and told me that the sound was just coming from those pinions out in the axle housing under light load just 'tapping' against their stops. Was he lying to me?

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John A

11-16-2004 10:39:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to Allan in NE, 11-16-2004 06:52:12  
Allan, Have you finelly "procured" yourself a 966 here lately? If so!, Tell us about her!pics? has she been dynoed?????
Did I miss the anouncement on be comming a new papa?
Later,
John A.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

11-16-2004 10:51:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to John A, 11-16-2004 10:39:11  
Hi John,

She is in the final stages of the birth canal as we speak..... ...waitin', waitin' waitin.....

I told 'em I was in no hurry. Dumb Allan, Dumb Allan!!! :>)

Later Dude,



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

11-16-2004 12:55:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to Allan in NE, 11-16-2004 10:51:45  
John,

It just dawned on me....when I was talking about the noise in the rear of my 966, I was talking about the one I used to have.

The one I'm waiting on is gonna be in SLIGHTLY rougher shape. As in locked engine, hasn't moved a wheel in 5 years, kids have busted all the windows out of the cab, etc., etc. (In other words, just a nice old tractor).

Good news is that I'm gettin' it for a song (salvage price).

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John A

11-16-2004 21:18:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to Allan in NE, 11-16-2004 12:55:13  
Allan, Sounds like you have got your work cut out for you! Nothing like a good challange. Keep us up to date. Are you going to do it or send it out for the work? Have fun!
Later,
John A.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

11-17-2004 04:08:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to John A, 11-16-2004 21:18:46  
Mornin John,

This deal is kind of a weird one and the very first thing I have to do is to assess what is really there and what isn't. I had found another one across town, but had to decline on it, as that one was pure, uncut junk.

The story goes something like this: The dealer here sold this feller a new loader a few years ago.

For some reason, the tractor ended up setting for a number years in a lean-to shed; I don't really know if the engine locked first or not, but the dealer says that no, he is sure that the engine has locked because of non use, because the owner didn't even know it was locked.

The owner thought the batteries had gone dead from setting for so long and had called the dealer to bring out some new ones to the farm. In the course of trying to start the tractor, the dealer is actually the one who discovered the locked engine.

Anyway, the owner, so the story goes, has fallen on hard times and needs to generate some cash so he's come back to the dealer to sell back that almost new loader, knowing full-well that the tractor is now all but worthless with it’s having that locked engine.

End game is that the dealer tells me that he has always done the service work on this tractor, knows it well and is confident that it is a good clean, straight unit except for the cab (which the kids have broken all the windows out of) and of course, that darned engine.

He has found a new owner for the loader and then it is up to me to decide if the tractor is salvageable or not. He had quoted me a price that is lower than what I paid for my old H, so who knows?

If, when it gets into town, I think I can save the tractor, I'll have the dealer drop in an engine and have him just pull that cab and put on a pair of fenders.

It all depends on the hours on the tractor and what everything else looks like, I guess. Should be interesting.

The downside is that the dealer knows fullwell that I am dumber than an old milk-pail full of fencing staples and that I will do just about anything to own another 966.

It’s the same old story; everybody comes out a winner except my bank account. :>)

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John A

11-17-2004 17:00:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to Allan in NE, 11-17-2004 04:08:44  
Allan, COOL! Sounds very intresting to me. Since the tractor has been sitting so long chances stand to reason that the rear end/ta should still be in good shape. To swing another engine in place could be an easy fix and be a fairly cheap tractor. Looseing the cab is the right thing to do. After you get her going and a problem develops there is "Mitchicippis" soluition of finding a tractor with a blone engine w/ a good rearend and marry them together. Wish I was closer to look at it and visit about it. Have fun!
Later,
John A.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MN Scott

11-16-2004 10:23:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to Allan in NE, 11-16-2004 06:52:12  
The 06 tru 86 series all use bull gears in the final drive exept the 1566, 1568, 1586, and maybe some of the 84 series, they use JD style planitaries. The bull gear attaches directly to the axle and is driven by the pinion that comes out of the differental. They are very similar to the letter series tractors final drives.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

11-16-2004 10:43:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to MN Scott, 11-16-2004 10:23:46  
Thanks Scott,

Guess I've been under a wrong impression all these years. :>)

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Aces

11-16-2004 05:05:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to K.W., 11-16-2004 02:57:30  
KW They are totaly difference and yes the 706 806 where the first tractors with the 16 speed trany ove the 10 speed of the 656 but the planitary drive never came out until the 1566 1568 and only in the 15.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

11-16-2004 03:53:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: 706 VS. 656 in reply to K.W., 11-16-2004 02:57:30  
KW,

They are two totally different tractors and this is the horsepower point where the chassis style changes.

I guess the main difference is the planetary style rear axle drives on the larger style tractors.

Along with this larger chassis also comes the different hydraulic system with the power clutch, power T/A and the power brakes.

The fastest way to tell the difference in the two chassis styles is to look at the rear axles. Six sided rear axle housings are on the big style and the square axle housings are used on the smaller style.

Another thing is to look at the batteries. The large body style carries the batteries with one along each side of the tractor.

The smaller style carries one battery in a compartment under the steering wheel area and the other back along the seat on the operator's platform.

Hope this helps,

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy