Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

656 ???

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Robert (ID)

08-24-2004 12:43:05




Report to Moderator

hey guy got a simple ? for you! got a friend thats got a 656 gas with a standard trans! he wants to get rid of it! he says it keeps eating valves! i know of 1 other in the area with the same complant! they keep burning valves and eating valve seats! My father has a 656 gas with a hydro but has never had such a problem! is there anything simple that can be done!! what is the tractor worth! its been sitting for a while! no cab and i think the fenders are missing!

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
karl fischer

08-25-2004 21:34:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to Robert (ID), 08-24-2004 12:43:05  
our 656 gas is the best tractor we have.
proper shut down is necessary for any engine that is used in a heavy duty setting. gotta let it idle and cool for a few minutes to prevent valvle warping. also on a light job they will run on fumes at most 4 gallons per hour which isnt so bad when you look at all the work you got done in that hour! -karl



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Aces

08-24-2004 17:06:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to Robert (ID), 08-24-2004 12:43:05  
Robert The answer to you question takes only one word, it may take more to put the engine back to good running condition. I don"t like to say it but we had problems with 656G 706G 806G 756G. That one word was oil, they need a low ash oil, if not to much carbon build up and bad plugs and burn valves. I have taken 656G that did not run and pull good after 100 hours new pull the head clean the carbon out up head back on and IH #1 engine oil and run fine. Oil! Oil!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

08-24-2004 13:38:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to Robert (ID), 08-24-2004 12:43:05  
Robert: To bad 656 hadn't been available in diesel only. Just last week in these discussions the consencus was 656D one of the finest tractors ever built and the 656G one of the poorest ever built.

Allan is bidding plenty for a parts tractor.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

08-24-2004 13:44:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to Hugh MacKay, 08-24-2004 13:38:15  
Hi Hugh,

I just cannot imagine anyone pouring fuel down the throat of one of these things. Those old M gassers were bad enough.

Ya didn't wanna forget to fuel at noon or you'd pack gas to the field before the day was over.

Whacha workin' on today?

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
TP from Central PA

08-24-2004 14:28:41




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to Allan in NE, 08-24-2004 13:44:44  
Yeah, you go try and start that D282 in below zero weather this winter..... ..... NOT years ago when they were new. We have a 706 with a D282 and while it is fuel efficient, that is probably the only good thing I can say about it. Gutless wonder, starts hard when it is 60 and nearly impossible in the cold even though it was just rebuilt before we bought it. For chore work where Hydro"s really excell I"d rather have a gasser. They are always ready when you need them.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
captaink

08-24-2004 15:18:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to TP from Central PA, 08-24-2004 14:28:41  
I’ve got a 560D with a 282 in it that I’ll put against any gasser in the winter. It will start @ -5 F on just glow plugs! Trick on the 282’s is to keep the pump, injectors, and glow plugs in good shape. Biggest internal problem was when most of them got rebuilt in the past, the valve seats were ground into the heads but the seats were never replaced. This eventually lowers the compression just enough so they won’t start in the winter. I know, as I had trouble with mine starting until I fixed the head back to factory specs.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
TP from Central PA

08-25-2004 04:56:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to captaink, 08-24-2004 15:18:39  
Do you plug it in? I have also heard the same things, but I never seen one of them around here start well. I was never a big fan of that power plant to begin with..... ..... .Not enough sh*t for a 706 anyhow. Why they didn"t put the D310 in them from the begining is beyond me.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hagan

08-25-2004 06:13:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to TP from Central PA, 08-25-2004 04:56:39  
I have a 715 combine with the 301 diesel (282 without sleeves) and it will always start good. In the summer maybe hold in on the glow plugs for 10 seconds and it is off and running. In the winter it starts real good when combining corn when it is 0 out. One year we were combining and it got to -18 one night and I hooked the pickup jumpper cables to the battery and it started right off after holding in on the glow plug for 2 minutes. I always felt that you ran the battery half down in cold weather heating up the golw plugs.
I have some friends who used their 560 D on a loader feeding and they made a bracket and hung a 12 volt battery on the loader frame and hooked to the starter too and it started lots better. These were plainly not a winter tractor with te 282D

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
captaink

08-25-2004 06:02:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to TP from Central PA, 08-25-2004 04:56:39  
Glad to hear from a bunch of you, I thought my comment might spark some responses.

Yes, when it gets below 0 I usually plug it in more to save the engine from the damage cold starting does than anything else. I use a time clock and have it set to heat about 4 hours before I plan to start it. I agree that the 282 wasn’t the greatest engine but my dad had a 560 Gas that he did custom corn shelling with until I bought the diesel. He used it once, and never used the gas again. See Allen’s response for most of the reasons.

One event comes to mind when I was using the 560 D on the feeder wagon and plugged it in outside on a timer on a grain bin. It was about -15 F (honest) that afternoon. I got the M on the loader started (not plugged in) and then went to start the plugged in 560. It was terribly grouchy about starting. It took me three tries before it started even though it was plugged in. I couldn’t figure out why until I unplugged the engine heater and checked the hose coming out of it. The hose was as cold as the temp outside. The heater had burned out! True story!!! From what I’m hearing and have heard I have a rare one and I’m gonna keep it, thank you!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

08-25-2004 07:17:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to captaink, 08-25-2004 06:02:10  
Hey Cap,

'Spose I oughta jump in here and spill my guts a little before everyone gets the idea that I'm a little careless with the truth.

Never was too wild about those two 6 volt batteries run in series. So, I did one of two things: either swapped 'em for two 12's in full parallel or ran a trickle charger on 'em all night to keep 'em warm.

That tied with a 2K watt recycle engine heater, and the goofy things will always start like it is 90 degrees out.

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

08-24-2004 16:22:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to captaink, 08-24-2004 15:18:39  
Cap,

There are some folks who just do not get along well with diesels. They just don't. They don’t quite understand ‘em and they just don’t want anything to do with the brawny beasts.

They don't like the noise, they don't like the smell, they don't like the initial cost of ownership & the resulting required maintenance and they just plain don't like anything ‘bout the old ‘rattlers’.

They wanna hit the key and go, just like with the family mini van; they want 'em quiet and they want 'em smooth.

And, just as you and I like our diesels, that is their prerogative to admire the gassers. More power to ‘em, I say; it's okay by me, it is totally their affair and it's their business.

I'm in your camp however & I'm older than dirt, but I’ve never ran across an IH D282 yet that wouldn't run cheaper, last four times as long, or out-lug it's gas counterpart and yes, even ALWAYS start at 30 below zero.

Ya just gotta love the old hammerin' things! Did I mention that I like IH diesels? :>)

Best to you and yours,

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
TP from Central PA

08-25-2004 04:59:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to Allan in NE, 08-24-2004 16:22:21  
Don"t know what D282 your running..... ..... They are a good engine wound up, but having ran acouple 560D"s and our 706 with the D282 and none of those lugged worth a crap. I will agree though they are better than the C263 gasser.

Alot of people hold that against the gas engines, I think people can accept the diesel since it runs so cheap.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

08-25-2004 06:43:41




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to TP from Central PA, 08-25-2004 04:59:50  
Mornin' TP,

I guess I'm havin' a problem imagining what you are comparing it to (or something?). :>(

Gotta remember that the little fellers are only what? 58 horse or thereabouts?

I think that for their size, they really shine when they are put in the harness; and yes, you're right; they have got to be wound up.

But, wait a minute. Maybe you and are are kinda disagreeing over an empty basket here. That 706 is a somewhat heavier built rig and maybe they were all just a little underpowered?.....Dunno, as I've never been on one.

Further, I gotta agree with you on the 560..they certainly were no "power house" by today's standards by any means and were really just one jump ahead of an MD.

But, all in all though, I maintain that when the 282D is strapped into a 656, they are one gutsy little rig for their size when they are tuned out right.

Who knows? Iron is just iron, as they say.

Top o the day to ya,

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

08-24-2004 15:14:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to TP from Central PA, 08-24-2004 14:28:41  
Don't quite know how to respond to that so guess I won't.

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

08-24-2004 13:12:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: 656 ??? in reply to Robert (ID), 08-24-2004 12:43:05  
I'll open the bidding at $1500 if it runs.

(And hope I can find someone with a spare engine to take it off my hands, as I don't own a fuel tanker nor do I want one.) :>)

Naw, second thought: $900 :>)

Allan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy