Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

? for randy hall + others about compresion+fuel

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
eric

09-10-2003 11:41:03




Report to Moderator

hey randy this is eric i am vics friend. he bought the m from you a few years back. you did the tires for him the summer. what compression does that m have? with a factory compresson engine do you guys who pull run low octane unleaded fuel with a lead additive? to me this seems like the best way to get gas the way the engine was designed for. i have seen guys put cam 2 in engines i know are just factory rebuilds. is this a waste? i have talked with a professional engine builder (automotive) and he said he runs cheapo unleaded with a lead booster in his restored parade tractor. just want to hear some thoughts. sorry if this topic is rerun alot.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
randy hall

09-10-2003 21:33:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: ? for randy hall + others about compresion+fue in reply to eric, 09-10-2003 11:41:03  
hi eric, vic has told me not to say much about the engine. he doesn't want anyone to know how many squirrels are peddling around in there. the standard compression ratio for a 'm' with flat top pistons and a gasoline head is 5.6 to 1. i have taken apart a lot of these old farmalls and i have never yet ran into a head that hasn't had seats installed for the exhaust valves. just use regular pump gas for best results and don't turn the nitrus valve too far open.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

09-10-2003 18:50:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: ? for randy hall + others about compresion+fue in reply to eric, 09-10-2003 11:41:03  
85 octane is fine, you don't need a lead substitute unless you are plowing 10 hours a day. Chances are the tractor has hardened seats. If not next time it needs a valve job they can be installed. If you do plow 10 hours a day you are going to need a valve job before long anyway. I think M's will run on dehydrated panther pee.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve - IN

09-10-2003 14:01:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: ? for randy hall + others about compresion+fue in reply to eric, 09-10-2003 11:41:03  
eric,
To get max performance, you should match the octane to the compression ratio. Higher compression ratio needs higher octane; lower compression ratio needs lower octane for best performance.

From recollection, a M has a C/R in the range of 6:1 to 7:1. The 85 octane at the pump is optimum for the 8:1 cars running around today. Actually, an M will want something around 70 octane, which you could get by mixing white gas or Coleman fuel in the tank.

The downside of it is that max performance makes more heat in the combustion chamber than pump gas. The M is around 50+ years old, and probably has straight cast heads, no hardened exh. valve seats. So more heat causes more valve reversion.

All in all, I'd use normal pump gas for convenience and add some two stroke oil, run it a bit rich, or some guys add ATF fluid; instead of adding expensive octane booster (when you really don't need more octane -- you're just trying to keep the exhaust valves cool).

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Guy Fay

09-10-2003 15:22:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: ? for randy hall + others about compresion in reply to Steve - IN, 09-10-2003 14:01:57  
Remember that to a large degree those engines were built to burn at higher tempetures to help with kerosene/distillate- they preheated the intake mixture.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve - IN

09-10-2003 18:21:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: ? for randy hall + others about compre in reply to Guy Fay, 09-10-2003 15:22:42  
Guy,
If it's a distillate engine, it has an even lower compression ratio than the gas version, so it should create less of an explosion -- less heat -- than a comparable gas engine assuming both use the same pump gas.

Also, if I remember correctly from chemistry classes and flight school -- the heat ducting shields help prevent the heavier kerosene molecule (with 10 to 12 carbon atoms) from falling out of suspension; as it's heavier than the octane gas molecule with 8 carbon atoms. It was all academic in chemistry, but in flight school the benefits carb heat and the inverse of augering in, or "bought the farm" were heavily emphasized. You know.. the old pilots and the bold pilots, but rarely do you find an old, bold pilot.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Guy Fay

09-10-2003 19:20:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: ? for randy hall + others about co in reply to Steve - IN, 09-10-2003 18:21:06  
The engine itself was run at higher tempeture. In addition to the heat shields, which raised the tempeture probably well above what you'd see in a normally aspirated aircraft engine, radiator shutters and thermostats were used.

In aircraft, the purpose of carb heating is to prevent ice from forming within the carburetor- carb heat is used mainly in conditions within a certain range of humidity and tempetures to prevent ice, and lower efficiency results, which is why you don't really use it at altitude, just when you're coming up and down in most (not all) circumstances. Damn, that aviation ground school I took all those years ago finally got put to use. Ice can litteraly choke off the carburetor (it can also happen in cars and tractors, but is rarer).

The use of carb heating in a kerosene/distillate engine is only part of the story. Radiator shutters are used as well to bring the engine tempeture up quickly to promote clean, efficient burning, and to prevent crankcase oil dilution. The whole purpose is to raise the tempeture of the fuel/air misture to vaporize/evaporate the fuel, which takes place at a much higher tempeture than gasolene- believe the measurement is vapor pressure, rather than octane.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve - IN

09-10-2003 20:42:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ? for randy hall + others abou in reply to Guy Fay, 09-10-2003 19:20:44  
Guy,
I think the distillate tractor engine was run with shutters -- higher temp -- because the heavier fuel is harder to fire --kerosene has more carbons than gas -- much like a Diesel wants to run hotter than a gas engine -- Diesel fuel almost has more carbons than gas and kero put together. Point is, the distillate doesn't fire as hot as pump gas when all other things are equal. Reason is because it has more carbons per hydrogens per molecule than gas. Carbons don't burn fast, hydrogens do.

Carb heat is used at altitude. Promise you! You can fall out of the sky at 10,000 ft as easily as 500 ft on final. Been there, done that (65F ambient, but with high humidity - got carb ice - nearly bought the farm). The trick with icing is the 20# between temp and dew point. If fuel or liquids like water falls out of suspension with air in a carb or manifold, it creates ice when temp and dew point are <=20 of one another. If it falls out of suspension at higher temps or lower dew points, you still have a fuel separated from the air and it simply makes lousy combustion at high temp/ low humidity instead of ice at low temp / high humidity. Same coin, just two different sides of it -- liquid or solid. What you want from a carb is a mist - air and fuel mixed -- not air and a buncha dribbles.

They call it the Joule-Thomson effect - which basically means that temp drops when fuel meets air through a venturi. Sure, cold air is more dense, but in relation to what? Heavier fuel (kerosene) still drops out of suspension in cold or hot air faster than lighter fuel -- gasoline --if all other things are equal. Therefore, the need to reverse that cooling effect is greater with kerosene than it is with gas. Carb heat - manifold heat - is simply a way to counter the Joule-Thomson effect.

Common sensical proof of all the above is that I bet you can find a lotta guys here who have seen frost form on their tractor carbs (gas or kero) on a dew laden summer morn. It's not rare.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Doug in OR

09-10-2003 18:45:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: ? for randy hall + others about co in reply to Steve - IN, 09-10-2003 18:21:06  
I'm sure that you noticed the slight loss of engine power every time you flipped your carb heat lever up. This tends to confirm what Guy said - the hotter air entering the combustion chamber has less density and produces less power. Yes, the manifold heat on a distillate tractor will cost you some performance - as well as allow you to use a lower octane fuel.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve - IN

09-10-2003 20:50:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ? for randy hall + others abou in reply to Doug in OR, 09-10-2003 18:45:45  
Doug,
Most of my time was in an 0-2. No lever, a pull cable to a flipper door in some sheet metal ducting. Got the loss of power with carb heat because the fuel was falling out of suspension and wasn't exploding.

They say the Continental engine does worse than a Lycoming in that regard. Don't know; but as to all the other who-ha, see the above diatribe.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Peabody

09-11-2003 05:35:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ? for randy hall + others in reply to Steve - IN, 09-10-2003 20:50:26  
Y'all are really making me miss my old flying days.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy