Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

Horsepower Question

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Ben Shipley

03-07-2007 06:46:21




Report to Moderator

I am looking at a new tractor right now, and in my search, I have come across a question that i wanted to try and find the best answer to.

When we farm boys talk tractors, and talk about horsepower, we talk in PTO H.P., correct? In other words, when I say my litte Ford Jubilee has 31 HP, I am talking rated PTO H.P. I have been told that 75-85% of the PTO HP is a close estimation of drawbar H.P. Is this accurate? I have been told this by a few dealers, some use 75 some 85 %. Either way, without a dyno, it is still a guess.

Do you concur that we usually speak in PTO HP most of the time? Is my 75-85% number an accurate figure?

Thanks

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
elb

03-07-2007 19:35:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Ben Shipley, 03-07-2007 06:46:21  
this brings to mind a post on the ford board several months ago, where a poster was getting grief from his neighbor over the fact that his new box store 25 hp lawn tractor super mower had more power than the mans 23 hp n series real tractor, apparently it escalated until out came the tow strap and the 2 tractors were hooked draw bar to drawbar, the neighbor got introduced to tourque and weight and traction,

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

03-08-2007 01:22:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to elb, 03-07-2007 19:35:20  
elb: That usually cures them.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Andrew Z

03-07-2007 16:14:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Ben Shipley, 03-07-2007 06:46:21  
This is also something to keep in mind to that HP is not the only thing to look at put the torque the enginge puts out. I know around the early to mid 50's they started to measure this. For example at like 990 RPMs a Super M puts out 360 foot pounds of torque, and the Super H put out 270 foot pounds at 1,090 RPMS. just one more thing to think about??

Andrew



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
sammy the RED

03-07-2007 09:49:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Ben Shipley, 03-07-2007 06:46:21  
Ben Shipley said:

"When we farm boys talk tractors, and talk about horsepower, we talk in PTO H.P., correct?"

NO, not all the time. We know tha a "M" is belt and drawbar rated, not pto.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

03-07-2007 07:58:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Ben Shipley, 03-07-2007 06:46:21  
Ben: I don't think there is such a thing as a set percentage. If you go through the Nebraska tests, you'll find a wide variation. Years ago when I bought new tractors, I always wanted to know 3 items on horse power 1: flywheel hp, 2: pto hp and 3: drawbar hp, and most of that had to come from Nebraska tests. The most efficient power train was the one the would give the highest percentage of flywheel hp from either drawbar or pto.

On the specific question you are asking, ratio of drawbar to pto hp, if you go through the Nebraska test book there are a couple of tractors that made 98% and there have been a few a lot lower than the figures you quoted. Where the average is, I wouldn't venture a guess.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob M

03-07-2007 07:50:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Ben Shipley, 03-07-2007 06:46:21  
Ben – PTO horsepower is essentially the engine’s net flywheel horsepower less the (relatively small) transmission losses thru the PTO driveline.

Drawbar HP on the other hand is the horsepower available to do “pulling” work. It is the engine net flywheel horsepower LESS losses in the transmission, tire friction/slippage loss, and the HP required to physically move the tractor over the ground. The last two items can vary considerably depending on the gross weight of the tractor, the nature of the ground being covered (soft and loose vs hard and firm), tire design/tread pattern, etc. Your suspicion these losses can consume 15% to 25% of a tractors gross flywheel HP not far off (look at a few Nebraska Tractor Test summaries sometime!)

Bottom line: If you want to compare a tractor’s ability to do pulling work in the field, drawbar HP is the number you want to be looking at. Drawbar HP is what truly “hauls the mail”.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

03-07-2007 14:51:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Bob M, 03-07-2007 07:50:46  
Bob: On the subject of PTO hp being basically flywheel hp, I will agree with you to a point, that point being when we started getting IPTO, live hydraulics, power shifts, power steering, etc. Most experts will tell you the modern day Deere or CaseIH loose close to 10% of flywheel hp when delivered to PTO shaft, and even more at drawbar.

For example the lowly Farmall A and SA, IH never had the SA tested at Nebraska. Most folks will tell you that due to live hydraulics the SA really never delivered as much hp to PTO or wheels as the A did, and that is precisely why it was never tested. IH decided to let rest on the A record. A lot of farmers that owned both will tell you the A actually had an edge.

I don't know as I ever knew the exact particulars, however a 300 with TA, IPTO and live hydraulics was another prime example. I expect most of the loss came from IPTO. I do know that back in the 50s if one was plowing or disking and disconnected the seasonal disconnect on the belly of the tractor for IPTO, it was noticable on drawbar pull.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob M

03-07-2007 19:05:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Hugh MacKay, 03-07-2007 14:51:05  
You're right on Hugh!

On early PTO's (eg. the Farmall H and M) PTO power passed thru only a single pair of gears and a dog clutch. Losses between the flywheel and the PTO stub shaft were probably only 2 or 3%.

More modern tractors use all manner of multiple planetary gear sets, hydraulic clutches, band brakes, etc. While they provide soft-starting and smooth live PTO, they do so at the expense of wasting 10% or more of the flywheel HP.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

03-08-2007 00:29:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Bob M, 03-07-2007 19:05:24  
Bob: Here is a horse power robber for you, and I never dreamed modern day automatic transmissions took so much hp. I had a Chevy 6.2 diesel, 4 speed automatic, near my home was a hill that would take that truck down to 30 mph. I removed the automatic, installed a 4 speed standard and went over that same hill at 60 mph. I knew there was hp loss, but never thought it that bad.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RustyFarmall

03-07-2007 07:26:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Ben Shipley, 03-07-2007 06:46:21  
There is now a post above this one, talking about a McCormick 22-36. In this case, the 36 represented the horsepower measured at the belt, and the 22 represented horsepower measured at the drawbar. Belt horsepower and PTO horsepower are usually the same. Drawbar horsepower will always be less due to the loss realized in the transmission and differential. A sustantial amount of drawbar horsepower can also be lost due to tire slippage.

For what it's worth, the first car I owned was a 1960 Chev. The 283 cubic inch engine was rated at 185 horsepower, but when I put that car to the test on the floor dynamometer at the auto mechanics school, we could measure only 60 horsepower at the rear wheels, and my instructor said that was normal.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hayfarmer

03-07-2007 07:08:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Ben Shipley, 03-07-2007 06:46:21  
Since we "farm Boys" tend to want to make everything seem bigger we usually talk about PTO hp. In the old days it was belt HP. Today most tractors are not going to transmit the full power to the wheels, just not enough weight. HP alone is rather misleading in that many lawn mowers have more hp than the old 8n but couldn't do the work.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T

03-07-2007 07:15:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Hayfarmer, 03-07-2007 07:08:01  
I like your point, my 1938 JD B was rated somewhere around 12 HP or so on the drawbar and Id like to see see a 2 cylinder so called 20 HP Murray Lawn tractor (but thats right out of the engine at maybe 3000 RPM) weighted down and geared however one pleases n hook it to a plow the JD could pull ????? ?????

HP is a function of Torque x RPM and right out of the engine is wayyyyy y more then AFTER gears n trannys n differential n alllll l that friction n heat losses.

John T

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob M

03-07-2007 08:00:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to John T, 03-07-2007 07:15:55  
John T - Another consideration:

A JD B will pump out 12 HP or whatever continuously for maybe 20 or 30 years without busting a sweat.

However that motor in that Murray mower will will likely be pretty well used up by the time it's reached 30 MINUTES of operation at it's "rated" 20 HP!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John T

03-07-2007 07:01:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Horsepower Question in reply to Ben Shipley, 03-07-2007 06:46:21  
Ben, I bet whichever rating of all yields the "higher" number is the one used to sell n advertise lol.

One heard of BOTH Drwabar HP and Belt Pulley HP etc on the older tractors and it obviously requires HP to drive the tranny n differential gears n friction yielding less HP on the drawbar versus any belt pulley and the PTO also requires gears n friction yeilding less HP on it versus HP right out of the engine.

Im unsure of your 75% estimate, but experience tells me that may not be too far off due to the friction and gears n tranny n differential losses of engine HP to the time it gets to the ground????? ????? ?????

John T

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy