Got my buck twice and JFK assination

Actually should read got my doe and buck, twice. This is going to take a bit, so hang on!

I hunt in a oval shaped 16 acre, field surrounded by woods an 2 1/2 sides. A ridge line runs kinda across the middle of the field, gravel filled, not farmable, and twenty or so feet higher than the field surface. Edges of the field drop off another ten to fifteen feet abruptly into the woods.

This evening, I went out in the SUV, parked in a cut in the hill, and got out, loaded the rifle, put it adjacent to the vehicle. Got back in the car, to seek shelter from the cold temperatures and the cutting wind. Turned on the radio to listen to the news. Didn't expect to see anything due to the cold, unpleasant conditions. They weren't done with the news, when I saw a buck in the SW corner of the field, easily 200 yards out. Got out of the car, retrieved the rifle. Walked around the rear of the SUV, leaned my left shoulder against the rear window, acquired the deer in the scope and touched it off. Deer staggered forward about ten feet, wheeled, and disappeared into the woods. Was sure I hit. Walked down to where I shot him and found him crumpled about 50 feet down in the woods. On examining him, I had seen him before - twice, once before season, once last Friday. He had a very distinct set of antlers, A long white spike on the right - twice the height of his ear, a short dark two point on the left, hardly higher than his ear. But what next caught my attention was a part in the hair, almost right down his back. On closer examination, the part was a crease in the skin, rather fresh, which left the skin bare and an abrasion on the surface. Clearly has been shot before.....

Fast backwards to Friday evening. I was in the north east corner of the field, sitting under a bush on the ridge line. Hunting buddy sitting in my blind about 200 yards to the west, near where I had parked the car tonite. Was facing a chunk of woods that jutted out into the SE corner of the woods, about 100 yards away. Suddenly a buck and doe appeared coming out of the woods, coming right toward me. Grabbed the rifle and attempted to acquire a deer in the scope. But they had dropped behind a rise in the field. AND I had forgotten to turn the scope back to low power, making it extremely difficult to acquire them in the scope. Doe suddenly appeared at about 100 feet. Fired, racked another shell, acquired the buck and fired again. Doe went flying past me about twenty feet to the right, and collapsed in the brush behind me. Buck continued past on my right, and was last seen making fast progress across the ten acre field behind me. Elapsed time between shots was probably less than a second.
Partner to the right (previously mentioned), thought it was a shot and it's echo, and one heckova echo! Son was on the other end of the farm, 1/2 mile away, heard it as two shots, but thought it was my partner shooting his semi-auto.
So in that time I got one deer, and a piece of the second. I'm shooting a bolt-action Weatherby, NOT a semi-auto! The scar on my buck's back is exactly consistant with what would have happened Friday nite.

Now, what does this have to do with JFK??????

There is a computer animation of the asassination scene, showing how it could have happened based on study of the scene and the 8mm video shot at the time. In this animation, one shot caught the president, and then continued forward throught the seat, striking the governor in the back. A total of over 8 seconds elapsed for the three shots. I believe this is consistant with an experienced shooter, with a bolt action rifle. Since only one round accounted for the two wounds, it is completely plausable. If I can shoot two running deer, in a second or so... The other "shots" recorded over the police radio? Echos off surrounding buildings - that's my take. Now there is probably far more background intrigue in the story, but I think one lone gunman could have done this.

Sorry, I have pictures of the buck but no way to post them here!

There is so much more evidence than the guess at whether Oswald could have made the shots. Someone better he may have made all 3 bullets count in less time, while someone else may have missed all together.
One thing to remember is that the original medical discoverys were changed, eliminating a shot from another direction. How convenient.

What did you do with the deer?

Doe went to partner's freezer; I get the buck. Will be at the butcher in the morning.

With the damage they did to my crops this year, they owe me some!

Hi 730d se: Google "lee_harvey_oswald" Read Wikipedia.. about half page down is the following: Like all Marines, Oswald was trained and tested in riflery, scoring 212 in December 1956[11] (slightly above the minimum for qualification as a sharpshooter) but in May 1959 scoring only 191[11] (barely earning the lower designation of marksman).[22]

Oswald was court-martialed after accidentally shooting himself in the elbow with an unauthorized handgun, then court-martialed again for fighting with a sergeant he thought responsible for his punishment in the shooting matter. He was demoted from private first class to private and briefly imprisoned. He was later punished for a third incident: while on nighttime sentry duty in the Philippines, he inexplicably fired his rifle into the jungle.
end of Wikipedia Quote... Oswald was NOT a great shot at all.. His history indicates he was not a good shot at all. The other comments about Deer hunters don't relate as being Equal since the size of a deer is bigger then seeing and hitting just a human head sitting up in the back of a car that's moving away. Deer is bigger target and most hunters think they are better then they really are. In closing, it is just History for quite some time now and humans are not always accurate when recording history. Even the Bible(KJV) has some contradictions in it. ag..

A lot of the problem is the gun.Yeah you might be able to do it,but a lot of people have tried and a lot of better shots than Oswald was,and very few hit the target more than once.

All you get out of what the government did,or the Warren Report was a lie.I remember lots of people saying that back when it first came out.

Most people nowdays dont believe the Warren Report.Not even the government.Congress looked at this stuff in the 1970s and found a lot of things like people dieing mysteriously.Yeah say out of 50 some close witnesses,some who were in the mafia,all ended up dead?Yeah right!Plus the guys that most people who investigated said probably did it were even killed.

I think there is a way better chance that the CIA did it and at least one shooter was behind that picket fence on the grassy knoll.

Some report they did, said there were 5 shots.They found evidence of where bullets hit concrete and tracks in the grass for some shots.So even the police at the time knew better than 3 shots.That was a lie.

I dont even think there was a shot that hit Kennedy from behind.They manufactured evidence to make it look that way.Johnson was probably involved and he had the interior of the car removed and shredded.I wonder why?Johnson did a lot of suspicious things about that including the Warren Commission report which was crap.

So say there was a bullet that hit Kennedy from behind and went through him and hit Connely,anybody who looks at the film can see that Kennedy was hit from the front.Half of his head ended up on the lid of the trunk of the car.Mrs Kennedy crawled out on the trunk lid and got it.So now how did he get shot from behind and it blew half of the top and side of his head backwards onto the trunk with the car nearly stopped?Kennedy was hit 2 times at least.The first one hit him in the neck somehow,and it could have been from behind,but its doubtful that it was anything like the Warren Commission said it was.Plus that bullet there might have hit Connely but it wasnt the bullet they"found" which they claim did it.That bullet has to be the best looking bullet in history that went through Kennedy and Connelly and came out looking perfect.

Ive seen the animation and even where they shoot at some watermelons and stuff and they seem to be able to prove the crap the Warren Commission reports,but thats what they were paid to do.The crooks want everybody to think Oswald did it by himself.Well thats crap because there are lots of things still happening now that proves the CIA or somebody was involved.Maybe even GHW Bush was there that day.

May as well face facts,there is a bunch of crooks in the government,behind the scenes,who pull things and so far have got away with this and other stuff like RFK assasination.

JFK getting assassinated is one thing,but RFK as he was running for President,and all the lies being told about JFKs assassination,its not hard for most people to say that there was a conspiracy going on.Actually its almost certain that there was.

Besides what I wrote here,lots and lots of people have studied this stuff.There are people in other countries who have said the Warren Commission was crap.There are people who gave testimony about this stuff and Ruby and a bunch of creepy people who worked for the government.They even made a movie about some of it.

There are sound tapes from a police motorcycle or something and it sounds like 5 shots from 3 different guns were fired.Its not echoes.You can plainly hear the different shots and when they break them down with their equipment you can see the difference.There were at least 3 guns used.

Ok so we know now that 3 guns were used.Kennedy was hit from the front,blew part of the side and top of his skull onto the trunk lid.It lines up to the general direction of the grassy knoll in the trees and picket fence,which was not far from the road at all.Also some say there was another shooter on top of a Railroad overpass.There was a eyewitness that saw him,and he had some kind of take apart gun which he shot,took apart and put in a box on the side of the railroad tracks and walked off.A deaf guy saw him.

So there is potentially at least 2 shooters.Oswald may have been in the book depository,and maybe he did shoot out of the window,and maybe he did hit Kennedy and Conneley.Maybe it wasnt Oswald.They had very little to go on and everything was too easy for the cops that day.Besides that,what killed Kennedy was the shot that took the top of his head off.He was alive before that,maybe had a bullet hole in him,but not dead.That head shot killed him.

The government story is a lie.Also a lot of witnesses were killed,which also says somebody is covering it up.Johnson doing stupid things,RFK being assassinated.So there you are.I wouldnt believe anything the government said unless they somehow proved it.

At the time,Johnson said that everything would be sealed for 70 years,or until most people alive at the time were dead,before any more came out.Well that tells you right there that the government is covering it up.They are even lying about covering it up.

Lots of smart people have studied this stuff and for the most part all of the investigating leads to the same thing happening.The CIA did it.Oswald was a patsy.Plus people are still scared to talk about it.

So far they got away with it,but most people dont believe their lies about it.

Are your numbers today better than the last ones you published? I hope so. FYI the US 2010 GDP is running 14.83 TRILLION DOLLARS, as oppossed to the 2009 GDP which was 14.1+ TRILLION DOLLARS. No, that's not the national debt which, according to the clock, hasn't hit 14 trill yet. Better yet, the 2011 GDP is forecast to easily exceed 15 Trill. By far the largest single country GDP although the EU did come in at 16+ trill. Only trying to help. (;>)