Look,plain and simple,Nixon had 6 years to screw up the economy,then there was Gerald Ford for 2 years.Then Jimmy Carter(southern governor actually more nnalert than nnalert,right wing and abundant)for 4.None of the 3 was worth much.The big problem was the war in Vietnam.The one Nixon claimed he would stop in 1968.Jimmy Carter inherited the inflation from the loosing of the Vietnam War.If you are 40 some years old,you should know this stuff.You conveniently forget about the nnalert contribution to the problem,but are all for putting blame on a nnalert.Typical modern nnalert,just like the old ones.Why not tell us now how your 4 dollar gas and 5 dollar diesel President is so great?If he doesnt quit running his mouth about Iran he is going to start WW3,and we are going to be at a gun fight with a knife,and nuclear weapons.Do you want Pandoras Box opened?Are you ready for a nuclear war?If you are so good of a nnalert you need to get the nnalert in Washington DC to represent this country,not rich people in Saudi Arabia,just like old Jimmy Carter thought he was only supposed to help peanut farmers.Neither way is right,and if these people dont stop this nonsense there is not going to be much America left standing,as if there is now.Even if you are from Canada,its not going to help you if the USA falls.You will be in he!! to
h yeah,please tell about how good it is to speculate commodities like oil,and ruin the economy,in the world,so rich people can get richer,and lots of folks can starve.Also just to top it off,just what turned around under Ronald Reagan?He was as disgusting as any other nnalert.We still are suffering from his"conservativism"which has run lots of jobs to other countries,trade agreements like NAFTA,ended millions of union jobs,and caused things like drugs to devastate parts of America,and peoples lives,with millions in prison.The only good thing about Ronald Reagan is that he is not still our president.Its going to be up to history as to how good or bad he really was,want to bet on how it will come out?If the truth is told,he was only a little better than this Bush,but worse than Daddy Bush.Yeah,Reagan was not the worst nnalert,but he was a big crook,and if you are smart,you will leave this alone,it can always get worse.You can blow all you want,but the best"nnalert"president we have had since Eisenhower was Bill Clinton.Even if he called himself a nnalert,he had a nnalert congress,and being from the south was more nnalert than nnalert.If you want an example of somebody that took the country in the right direction for the most part,its Bill Clinton.Run your mouth about that,and you are just ignorant.I didnt care for what Clinton did to the military,but he had to get money somewhere,and the nnalert controlled congress of the day was just as responsible for the destruction of the military as he was.Its not hard to see that Clinton knew what he was doing in a lot of areas that the rest just dont get,and sad at the same time,because there was lots more that should have,and could have been done.It was an uphill fight for anybody that tries to set the country right in my whole life watching this from Eisenhower until now.I will give any nnalert the benefit of the doubt even if I am a nnalert.The best one I saw was Eisenhower,and that may be because I was too young to remember him much.In my opinion,bad as he was,Nixon was better than Reagan.All the good about Reagan was hype.He was bought and paid for by big money,just like Nixon.Good or bad the best thing Nixon did was talk to China which nobody did for a long time,but I think it helped China more than the rest of the world.Nixon actually will look a lot better in history than Reagan if the truth is told.All Nixon did was make a couple of big mistakes,and kind of set us up for destruction,but I think he really was trying to run the country right,he just didnt know how.Reagan on the other hand had an agenda from the first day,give it all away to big business.Even a broken clock is right 2 times a day,and Reagan was lucky enough that some of his ideas actually worked,plus he had to think he was helping America.I am not going to let you get away with saying Ronald Reagan was good for our country.He may very well thought he was right,but its questionable as to giving all that he did to big business helped anything.I feel that it speeded up the demise of our great country.Just like LBJs big idea was a failure in a way,Ronald Reagan gave a lot of welfare to business that it wasnt even asking for.Maybe it helped to go that direction at the time,but it was kind of hard on working people,and working folks are still suffering from Reagans agendas that have been amplified to where it takes Mom and Dad both working away from home to raise kids,and lots of family farms are gone because of stupidly low grain prices and other stuff.I liked his lower interest rates,but they were still too high at 10-12%,and that Russia lost the cold war,but that was not because of Reagan exclusively,another thing he was lucky for happening,and somebody attributed it to him,not legitimately,although he probably had as much to do with it as any of the rest did before him.Reagan was not a very good president,but lots better than the one we now have.Maybe Im wrong,Reagan was probably just as bad as this one,just that all the destruction was not in place at the time.I think its fair to say that all of them have made some fairly big mistakes,and the ones calling themselves nnalert arent smart enough to be able to tell that by giving everything to the rich they are tearing up the country.No conscious.They dont care about anything but themselves and their big shot buddies.