Author	[Modern View]
Damian Mizera 08-14-2012 22:07:07 70.198.5.216 Report to Moderator	trying to decide whether to put money into some repairs (convert to 12V and some broken windows on the cab) on my 1964 4020 or trade for a 1971 Oliver 1755 that's in a lot better shape. The Oliver doesn't have a front loader that the 4020 does. I use the tractor for plowing/grading a long driveway, loading round bails, and helping with clearing brush. Any advice? [Reply]   [No Email]
1755 dsl 08-16-2012 15:44:13 69.69.247.14 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-14-2012 22:07:07   i got a 1755 with a hole in the block [Reply]  [No Email]
bock 08-15-2012 20:15:43 174.252.4.31 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-14-2012 22:07:07   keep 4020 you will atleast be able to get your money out of it later on could you say that about a 1755 [Reply]  [No Email]
rrlund 08-16-2012 12:35:59 207.241.137.116 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to bock, 08-15-2012 20:15:43   I'm trying to be educational here,not condicending. You're absolutely right about the resale value of a Deere,but that only matters if you know when to take advantage of it. I bought a 4040 brand new. Loved it,wore it right out. Because it was a Deere and had so much resale value,I was able to trade it,even money for a Series 3 White 2-135 with a third fewer hours and half again as much horsepower. I only paid for the Deere but traded it for one that wasn't worn out,so I got two for the price of one. When I bought the Deere,it was about the same price as a White 2-85 or 2-105. That's when the resale value of a Deere mattered,when I bought it new. I did the same thing with a 3010. That tractor was to the point of being totally worn out and worthless. Again,Deere resale value,I traded it even money to a jockey for an Oliver 1600 with fewer that 4000 hours. Sounds like the original poster has the oportunity to do the same thing now. Trade a worn out Deere for an Oliver in good shape. So whatever he paid for the Deere in the first place got him two for the price of one if he takes advantage of the situation and trades. [Reply]  [No Email]
WBH2 08-15-2012 17:03:11 98.30.12.83 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-14-2012 22:07:07   Without being partial to either brand, why make work for yourself? The 4020 is a proven leader in its class and the loader is beneficial to your cause. And when it is time to sell, you will likely have a larger pool of buyers in the JD camp. [Reply]  [No Email]
StephC 08-15-2012 15:01:50 74.15.247.242 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-14-2012 22:07:07   Put the loader on the 1755 so you can put the 4020 in the scrap pile!!!! [Reply]  [No Email]
Larry NEIL 08-15-2012 07:45:26 76.203.23.48 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-14-2012 22:07:07   Besides, that Oliver is over 35 yrs old. If it ain't had a rebuild or flown apart yet.......I'd do exactly as RRLund said. get or make mounts to put your loader on the 1755. Larry NEIL [Reply]  [No Email]
rrlund 08-15-2012 06:29:29 207.241.137.116 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-14-2012 22:07:07   Get the brackets to change the loader over to the Oliver. I'll be honest,if it was me,for what you're going to use it for,I'd be looking for a 1655 instead. But if the 1755 is what's available,sure,change the loader over and go for it. [Reply]  [No Email]
johns 08-15-2012 06:10:01 69.163.7.60 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-14-2012 22:07:07   What kind of shape is the bucket/loader on the 4020? If its decent then keep the 4020, unless you plan on buying a loader for the 55. When converting from 24v to 12v, the kit from JD is overpriced ($1,000)in my opinion. When I was a partsman at our local JD dealer we got our kits from Select Parts out of Sioux City IA. The hydraul-shift on the 1755 has more/better gear selection than the JD sychro or powershift. The engine issues weren't as common on the lower hp non-turbo Olivers, but I personally would rather have the updates. Is the 1755 diesel? I wouldn't buy a gas, too hard on fuel. [Reply]  [No Email]
Damian Mizera 08-15-2012 22:34:43 67.142.182.21 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to johns, 08-15-2012 06:10:01   Thanks for the reply. The bucket/loader's in pretty good shape. also has a grapple on it. It's been welded on one side where it must of cracked. The Oliver is a diesel. JD dealer's quoted me $1700 for the 12V conversion. [Reply]  [No Email]
cooop 08-15-2012 05:39:34 74.206.44.182 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-14-2012 22:07:07   Let me first start out and say that I am an Oliver guy. But, given the circumstances, I would keep the 4020. Mainly just because it has a loader and it sounds like you use the loader. The Oliver is a great tractor IF it has had the engine updates to prevent it from throwing a rod out the side of the block. The previous sentence is mainly for the diesels. If the Oliver is a gas then the engine problems could potentially still be there but on the gassers the problems are less severe. The 1755 is a much more modernized tractor than a 4020 Deere. Personally, I would take the cab off the 4020. Then you wont have to replace a window. But you may want the cab. [Reply]  [No Email]
Vernon in Ks 08-15-2012 06:25:30 66.210.29.131 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to cooop, 08-15-2012 05:39:34   Your confusing the 1755 with the 1855 on the motor updates. The 1755 was not turboed and didn"t have those problems. [Reply]  [No Email]
Oliver Pro 08-15-2012 08:19:42 69.161.42.199 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Vernon in Ks, 08-15-2012 06:25:30   The 1755s had those problems too. Just not as severe as the turboed 18 and 19. I have seen 1755s throw rods because of the wrist pin bushings. It is even more of a problem when the owner "turns up the fuel" to get more power due to the extra heat being produced. The 1755s are not in the clear just because they dont have turbos. [Reply]  [No Email]
Damian Mizera 08-15-2012 22:47:42 67.142.182.21 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Oliver Pro, 08-15-2012 08:19:42   Thanks for the reply. The Oliver appeals to me because it looks to be in great shape including the cab, but haven't had a chance to hear it run. The add for it says it runs great. My 4020 is in pretty used shape. How serious is this engine issue though? [Reply]  [No Email]
Rich10e 08-17-2012 04:30:27 184.94.132.94 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-15-2012 22:47:42   The engine wont be an issue just doing what your doing,that was back when they were being pulled hard [Reply]  [No Email]
Damian Mizera 08-17-2012 21:51:04 67.142.182.27 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Rich10e, 08-17-2012 04:30:27   Ok. Thanks. Appreciate the advice. [Reply]  [No Email]
Been around 08-16-2012 19:45:44 166.147.72.19 Report to Moderator	Re: JD 4020 vs Oliver 1755 in reply to Damian Mizera, 08-15-2012 22:47:42   Price your rebuild kits for either tractor remember your jd has inboard brakes at that age if they go to pieces that will get expensive real quick been on both the later Jd are super sweet but expensive to work on and the tranny on the Oliver is almost bulletproof the Oliver is easier to work if you have to also we have done all our on work on ours never scared if we have any problems but as was said some folks are colored blind good luck [Reply]  [No Email]